On Feb 15, 2011, at 2:01 PM, Munroe Sollog wrote:
I am investigating using the dlz-ldap driver to store my zone file in
ldap. Before doing so, it seems that the official driver page had
less
than stellar things to say about the ldap driver.
Is anyone using LDAP as a backend? Are you happy
On Feb 14, 2011, at 8:31 PM, Terry. wrote:
> check your configure especially for:
>
> * notify/ also-notify/ allow-notify
Thanks you all who replied, I needed the allow notify.
-j
> * allow-transfer
> * does slave named have the permittion to write to data dir?
>
> Regards.
>
> 2011/2/15 do
Firstly please get your mail client fixed. Turning comma's to "=2C"
isn't needed and defeats the purpose of printed quotable which is
to do the minimum changes to make the message transmitable via 7bit
smtp so that the message is readable by old clients. Anything above
that minimum is a bug.
In
I am investigating using the dlz-ldap driver to store my zone file in
ldap. Before doing so, it seems that the official driver page had less
than stellar things to say about the ldap driver.
Is anyone using LDAP as a backend? Are you happy with the performance?
Is there a future for LDAP and B
bsfinkel> In the posting and on the ISC release notes page on the web,
bsfinkel> under "Feature Changes" - the first heading "9.7.2" should
bsfinkel> read "9.7.3".
No, it's correct. Those were new features in 9.7.2. 9.7.3 has a number
of bug fixes but no "new" features over 9.7.2.
But it's good
On 15/02/11 01:15, Mark Andrews wrote:
* There is a new update-policy match type "external". This allows
named to decide whether to allow a dynamic update by checking with
an external daemon. Contributed by Andrew Tridgell of the Samba
Project. [RT #22758]
This is
> > BTW, does bind-9.7's threads work well on Linux X86 platform?
Yes they do, but note that threads are not enabled by default on Linux; you
have to configure BIND9 with the --enable-threads option.
(This requirement has probably outlived its usefulness and we should enable
them by default now.
Dear all,
I am testing an upgrade from bind8 to bind9.
For this, I have installed bind9 in a server with the same configuration files
as present in the server running bind8.
When I start bind9, I have the following errors and the server do not start.
Can you anyone answer the questions presne
In the posting and on the ISC release notes page on the web,
under "Feature Changes" - the first heading "9.7.2" should read "9.7.3".
--
--
Barry S. Finkel
Computing and Information Systems Division
Argonne National Laboratory
* Dennis Clarke:
> I would think a posix speec compliant implementation would work anywhere.
BIND uses its own locking mechanisms, using machine code insertions.
For fringe some platforms, they do not seem to be correct. i386 or
amd64 should be fine, though.
(Switching to GCC's synchronization
On 2/14/2011 10:30 PM, Terry. wrote:
>> slave options;
>> allow-transfer { 10.1.1.2; };
>
> In practical the slave doesn't have the allow-transfer option.
Sure it does. Any authoritative server (master or slave) can act as the
source for a zone transfer.
AlanC
signature.asc
Description: O
11 matches
Mail list logo