On 2010-12-07 23:31, David A. Evans wrote:
>
> I'm in the mood to prove a point. I have a very poorly written
> application that is generating a few hundred queries per second of
> completely bogus records before attempting a lookup of the correct
> A records. This is because the a
Hi Mark,
Thanks for your quick response !
> Standards Track.
> RFC 2671 Extension Mechanisms for DNS (EDNS0)
> RFC 3226 DNSSEC and IPv6 A6 aware server/resolver message size requirements
Unfortunately RFC is not considered as good enough ... unless if we
can find an actual proof that can be repl
In message , Rian
to Wahyudi writes:
> Our network team are quite reluctant to make any changes on the FWSM
> in regards to DNS inspection.
> So it seems that we are stuck with maximum UDP packet of 512 byte.
>
> Unfortunately, I do not have much evidence (ie user complains) to
> escalate this iss
Our network team are quite reluctant to make any changes on the FWSM
in regards to DNS inspection.
So it seems that we are stuck with maximum UDP packet of 512 byte.
Unfortunately, I do not have much evidence (ie user complains) to
escalate this issue much further except from few number of users w
I can guarantee that ns1.nameserver.net was not provided to this user by anyone
in a position to do so authoritatively.
On Dec 7, 2010, at 10:23 AM, Greg Whynott wrote:
> i'm wondering if domain.net and ns1.nameserver.net are defaults which haven't
> been configured yet. but he is a senior
On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 16:31 -0600, David A. Evans wrote:
> I would like to silently drop the record lookups instead
> of responding back with NXDOMAIN. Thusly generating a performance hit
> as the application waits 2 seconds for the reply.
Responding with NXDOMAIN will have a defini
I'm in the mood to prove a point. I have a very poorly written
application that is generating a few hundred queries per second of
completely bogus records before attempting a lookup of the correct A
records. This is because the application was compiled with a IPv6
interface enab
On Mon, 6 Dec 2010, Barry Margolin wrote:
In article ,
Jay Ford wrote:
On Mon, 6 Dec 2010, Martin McCormick wrote:
the config for this private zone is:
zone "r.ds" {
type master;
file "/etc/namedb/master/r.ds.zone";
allow-update {
key updsrv;
};
allow-query
i'm wondering if domain.net and ns1.nameserver.net are defaults which haven't
been configured yet. but he is a senior sysadmin, i'm sure he considered that
already…
-g
On Dec 7, 2010, at 7:37 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> On 07.12.10 11:06, Ejaz wrote:
>> We have problem in sending mai
On 07.12.10 11:06, Ejaz wrote:
> We have problem in sending mail emails when using black berry device,
> problem is like user cannot send emails either inside or outside the domain
> when some one connected to our ISP and use our DNS server,
>
> Does it require any special configuration of bind i
On 12/07/2010 07:53 AM, Jürgen Dietl wrote:
Hello Sergiu,
I tried to put in 2 credential Entries in the named.conf:
tkey-gssapi-credential "DNS/test.loc"; (that was in before)
tkey-gssapi-credential "USER/test.loc", (new entry)
tkey-domain "TEST.LOC";
This is all wrong.
There are two principa
Hello all
We have problem in sending mail emails when using black berry device,
problem is like user cannot send emails either inside or outside the domain
when some one connected to our ISP and use our DNS server,
Does it require any special configuration of bind in named.conf file for
12 matches
Mail list logo
