Re: out of place mx records.

2010-10-28 Thread Mark Andrews
In message <458977.96237...@web53606.mail.re2.yahoo.com>, Fr34k writes: > > In message , Barr > y > >Mar > > golin writes: > > > In article , > > > Tony Finch wrote: > > > > > > > On Thu, 28 Oct 2010, Gregory Machin wrote: > > > > > > > > > > My question is why would "INMX10 mc

Re: out of place mx records.

2010-10-28 Thread Fr34k
- Original Message > From: Mark Andrews > To: Barry Margolin > Cc: comp-protocols-dns-b...@isc.org > Sent: Thu, October 28, 2010 9:49:46 PM > Subject: Re: out of place mx records. > > > In message , Barry >Mar > golin writes: > > In article , > > Tony Finch wrote: > > > > > O

Re: out of place mx records.

2010-10-28 Thread Mark Andrews
In message , Barry Mar golin writes: > In article , > Tony Finch wrote: > > > On Thu, 28 Oct 2010, Gregory Machin wrote: > > > > > > My question is why would "INMX10mcvpemr01" and "INMX > > > 10mcvpemr02" be repeated trough the zone file surely this is > > > redundant ? > >

Re: out of place mx records.

2010-10-28 Thread Barry Margolin
In article , Tony Finch wrote: > On Thu, 28 Oct 2010, Gregory Machin wrote: > > > > My question is why would "INMX10mcvpemr01" and "INMX > > 10mcvpemr02" be repeated trough the zone file surely this is > > redundant ? > > Some hostmasters like to ensure that mail is not dir

Re: basic MX question

2010-10-28 Thread Tony Finch
On Thu, 28 Oct 2010, fddi wrote: > > I am going to start in production environment a bunch of 3 mail servers for my > domain, let'say mydomain.com > > I need to install a X509 certificate on each server in a way that upon > x509 authentication thunderbird or whatever MUA won't complain about > host

Re: out of place mx records.

2010-10-28 Thread Phil Mayers
On 28/10/10 11:56, Tony Finch wrote: On Thu, 28 Oct 2010, Gregory Machin wrote: My question is why would "INMX10mcvpemr01" and "INMX 10mcvpemr02" be repeated trough the zone file surely this is redundant ? Some hostmasters like to ensure that mail is not directed to host

Re: out of place mx records.

2010-10-28 Thread Tony Finch
On Thu, 28 Oct 2010, Gregory Machin wrote: > > My question is why would "INMX10mcvpemr01" and "INMX > 10mcvpemr02" be repeated trough the zone file surely this is > redundant ? Some hostmasters like to ensure that mail is not directed to hosts that do not listen on SMTP. They

basic MX question

2010-10-28 Thread fddi
Hello I have a question. I am going to start in production environment a bunch of 3 mail servers for my domain, let'say mydomain.com I need to install a X509 certificate on each server in a way that upon x509 authentication thunderbird or whatever MUA won't complain about hostname different f

Re: non-improving referral

2010-10-28 Thread Leo Baltus
Hi Mark, Op 28/10/2010 om 13:38:13 +1100, schreef Mark Andrews: > In message <20101026161348.gj2...@omroep.nl>, Leo Baltus writes: > > We are in the process of migrating from bind-9.4-ESV-R2 to bind-9.7.2-P2. > > > > We have our authoritative servers migrated to bind-9.7.2-P2 and it all > > seems