In article ,
Eric Ritchie wrote:
> When doing a nslookup of a non-existent host on the same network as
> the bind servers, there is a delay. If I do the same nslookup from a
> host on a different network, the response is immediate.
My guess is that the server allows recursion for clients on
In article ,
João Alberto Kuchnier wrote:
> Ari,
>
> I fixed it to use only one reverse file. Like this below:
>
> zone "0-15.101.198.200.in-addr.arpa" {
> type master;
> file "/etc/bind/rev";
> allow-transfer { slave; };
> };
>
> The rev file is like this:
>
> ; 101
When doing a nslookup of a non-existent host on the same network as
the bind servers, there is a delay. If I do the same nslookup from a
host on a different network, the response is immediate.
host a is on the same network as bind servers, host b is on different
network:
hostb$ nslookup dev
On 2010-10-15 20:23, Jukka Pakkanen wrote:
> 15.10.2010 20:54, Niobos kirjoitti:
>> What's the advantage of using a date anyway? I too can see when a zone
>> was last edited, even down to the second, by watching the RRSIG(SOA)
>> timing.
>
> Time usually goes to one direction only, forward... so
15.10.2010 20:54, Niobos kirjoitti:
What's the advantage of using a date anyway? I too can see when a zone
was last edited, even down to the second, by watching the RRSIG(SOA) timing.
Time usually goes to one direction only, forward... so using date/time
makes sure you are always incrementing
On 16/10/10 4:54 AM, Niobos wrote:
>
> What's the advantage of using a date anyway? I too can see when a zone
> was last edited, even down to the second, by watching the RRSIG(SOA) timing.
Python 2.6.5 (r265:79359, Mar 24 2010, 01:32:55)
[GCC 4.0.1 (Apple Inc. build 5493)] on darwin
Type "help",
On 2010-10-15 17:14, João Alberto Kuchnier wrote:
> Dispite of that, I'm having some problems with reverse DNS. MxToolBox,
> for example, is saying that my reverse DNS is not configured.
That's because it isn't:
if I query for 3.101.198.200.in-addr.arpa (i.e. the reverse lookup for
IP 200.198.101.
On 2010-10-15 19:38, Jay Ford wrote:
> I found myself in need of more flexibility in the way dnssec-signzone
> handled SOA serial numbers, so I hacked in a way to have the new serial
> number generated by calling strftime(3) with a user-specified time
> format.
I was on the verge of doing something
I found myself in need of more flexibility in the way dnssec-signzone handled
SOA serial numbers, so I hacked in a way to have the new serial number
generated by calling strftime(3) with a user-specified time format. For
example
dnssec-signzone -N '%Y%m%d1' ...
will generate a serial number
Ari,
I fixed it to use only one reverse file. Like this below:
zone "0-15.101.198.200.in-addr.arpa" {
type master;
file "/etc/bind/rev";
allow-transfer { slave; };
};
The rev file is like this:
; 101.198.200.in-addr.arpa
$ORIGIN 0-15.101.198.200.IN-ADDR.ARPA.
$TTL864
2010/10/15 João Alberto Kuchnier :
> Hello Everyone!
>
> I have 6 domains configured in only one server. Is this a problem? Is
> bether to create one file for each domain or can I create one file for
> all of them?
>
> Dispite of that, I'm having some problems with reverse DNS. MxToolBox,
> for exa
Hello Everyone!
I have 6 domains configured in only one server. Is this a problem? Is
bether to create one file for each domain or can I create one file for
all of them?
Dispite of that, I'm having some problems with reverse DNS. MxToolBox,
for example, is saying that my reverse DNS is not config
In message <912627.28306...@web15706.mail.cnb.yahoo.com>, "Tech W." writes:
> =0A=0A--- On Fri, 15/10/10, Mark Andrews wrote:=0A=0A> From=
> : Mark Andrews =0A> Subject: Re: No cache for NS RR in publi=
> c DNS=0A> To: "Tech W." =0A> Cc: bind-us...@isc.org=
> =0A> Received: Friday, 15 October, 20
--- On Fri, 15/10/10, Mark Andrews wrote:
> From: Mark Andrews
> Subject: Re: No cache for NS RR in public DNS
> To: "Tech W."
> Cc: bind-us...@isc.org
> Received: Friday, 15 October, 2010, 9:21 PM
>
> In message <811222.51900...@web15706.mail.cnb.yahoo.com>,
> "Tech W." writes:
> > Hello,
>
You're saying its getting the records because they are cached at org?
-Original Message-
From: bind-users-bounces+jlightner=water@lists.isc.org
[mailto:bind-users-bounces+jlightner=water@lists.isc.org] On Behalf
Of Mark Andrews
Sent: Friday, October 15, 2010 9:21 AM
To: Tech W.
Cc
Stephane,
I have three bind servers. One internal and two (master and slave) for
external queries. On master named.conf.options, slave is in forwarders
list with OpenDNS e my ISP DNS servers. This option is causing this
issues?
João K.
Em Qui, 2010-10-14 às 21:21 -0600, Stephane Bortzmeyer escre
In message <811222.51900...@web15706.mail.cnb.yahoo.com>, "Tech W." writes:
> Hello,
>
> like this domain:
>
> blogchina.org
>
> I can't get its NS RR in public DNS:
>
> dig blogchina.org ns @8.8.8.8
>
> get nothing.
>
> But it does work correctly.
> for example, query the record:
>
> dig u
On 2010-10-15 10:52, Tech W. wrote:
> Hello,
>
> like this domain:
>
> blogchina.org
>
> I can't get its NS RR in public DNS:
>
> dig blogchina.org ns @8.8.8.8
>
> get nothing.
>From my perspective, blogchina.org has 12 authoritative name servers (as
reported by a0.org.afilias-nst.info).
ns1.d
On 13/10/10 15:50, Phil Mayers wrote:
On 13/10/10 15:16, Eivind Olsen wrote:
Has anyone here made use of the XML statistics interface in BIND9, to get
some numbers into Cacti (or another similar tool)? If so, how, and which
numbers did you feel were worth turning into graphs?
Yes.
We have a s
Hello,
like this domain:
blogchina.org
I can't get its NS RR in public DNS:
dig blogchina.org ns @8.8.8.8
get nothing.
But it does work correctly.
for example, query the record:
dig udb.yy.blogchina.org
works!
How to setup Bind for this?
Thanks!
__
20 matches
Mail list logo
