In article ,
Jiann-Ming Su wrote:
> I'm running BIND 9.6.1_P1. The server has multiple virtual interfaces that
> BIND
> listens on:
>
> listen-on { 127.0.0.1; 172.30.0.213; 192.168.43.98; };
>
> Sometimes I can get quite a huge difference in response time depending on
> which
> virtual in
In message <4cadef52.2020...@arcor.de>, Christoph Weber-Fahr writes:
> Hello,
>
> On 07.10.2010 02:40, Mark Andrews wrote:
> > In message <4cad0856.9010...@arcor.de>, Christoph Weber-Fahr writes:
> >> Well, I was talking about minimum values, and, especially,
> >> a min-ncache-ttl, i.e. a minimum
--On 7. oktober 2010 16.55.54 -0500 groups wrote:
One party thinks that disabling query logging will give enormous
performance gains, while 30% is a lot.. IMHO it is very negligible in CPU
cycles when the named process only is taking up > 10% CPU..
and less than 10% in RAM...
Just looking for an
Eivind Olsen wrote, On 10/07/2010 04:36 PM:
--On 7. oktober 2010 14.15.37 -0500 CT wrote:
1) How do I deternine the number of threads Bind is currently using ?
per the man page
You could check the syslog, or use rndc:
vimes# /usr/local/sbin/rndc status
version: 9.7.1-P2
CPUs found: 1
worker
--On 7. oktober 2010 14.15.37 -0500 CT wrote:
1) How do I deternine the number of threads Bind is currently using ?
per the man page
You could check the syslog, or use rndc:
vimes# /usr/local/sbin/rndc status
version: 9.7.1-P2
CPUs found: 1
worker threads: 1
...
2) What is the preferred wa
On Oct 3 2010, I wrote:
With a managed-keys statement including keys for "." and for
"dlv.isc.org", the managed-keys.bind file is normally updated
every hour for "dlv.isc.org" and every day for "." (the
respective TTLs of their DNSKEY RRsets, presumably). But
sometimes this updating simply stops
On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 11:30:03AM +0200, Kalman Feher wrote:
> >>
> >> probably it was not thought because it's wrong.
> >
> > This point is getting religious now, IMHO.
> Bear in mind that your rationale is based on getting an inaccessible DNS
> server to return information that a client has co
Hardware: Dell PowerEdge 2850
OS: RHEL 5.5 32 bit (no X)
Bind: BIND 9.3.6-P1-RedHat-9.3.6-4.P1.el5_4.2
RAM:2 Gig
Processes: Bind, ntp, ssh
My question(s):
1) How do I deternine the number of threads Bind is currently using ?
per the man page
-
Hello,
On 07.10.2010 02:40, Mark Andrews wrote:
> In message <4cad0856.9010...@arcor.de>, Christoph Weber-Fahr writes:
>> Well, I was talking about minimum values, and, especially,
>> a min-ncache-ttl, i.e. a minimum for negative caching.
>>
>> My point of view is that of a the operator of a very
Warren Kumari
--
Please excuse typing, etc -- This was sent from a device with a tiny keyboard.
On Oct 7, 2010, at 1:55 AM, Beat Jucker wrote:
> Hello BIND users
>
> I have a very strange problem with AXFR. We are using a master and a
> secondary DNS Server with an internal and an extern
On 10/7/2010 4:55 AM, Beat Jucker wrote:
Hello BIND users
I have a very strange problem with AXFR. We are using a master and a
secondary DNS Server with an internal and an external view. Depending
on the source address the secondary server will get the internal or
external view for zone transfer
As long as all of the in-addr.arpa data is administered on the same
master(s), then just use an "8-bit zone" i.e. 10.in-addr.arpa.
Everything within the 10 dot range all fits into a single zone.
The $INCLUDE directive gives you some independent flexibility,
and each record can (should) have its ow
>
>You can have a different TTL for each and every record, if you like, in
>the same zone file with no includes (the $TTL directive can appear
>multiple times).
>
>e.g. :
>
>$TTL 300; 5 mins
>*PTRhost-no-spec.example.com.
>$TTL 3600; 1 hour
>17 PTR mail.example.com.
>$TTL 1800
Hello BIND users
I have a very strange problem with AXFR. We are using a master and a
secondary DNS Server with an internal and an external view. Depending
on the source address the secondary server will get the internal or
external view for zone transfer.
Everything is working correct so far
14 matches
Mail list logo
