> Here my doubt is A record already returned in answer section why the same A
> record is returning in additional section. I know if MX pointed record have
> any A/ records will return in additional section. but in above case
> already the same A record returned in answer section. Is bind resul
Hi ,
I have data as follows
a.rameshops5446.com. 86400 IN A 1.2.3.1
a.rameshops5446.com. 86400 IN MX 10 a.rameshops5446.com.
I queried domain "a.rameshops5446.com" with type ANY against bind9.6 .
Actual Result:
Bind is returning above two records in answer section and also returning A
record in
On Aug 2, 2010, at 10:23 PM, Noel Butler wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-08-02 at 22:13 -0400, donovan jeffrey j wrote:
>>
>> Greetings
>>
>> i have an internal dns server it resolvs all my queries from the inside.
>> I have a mail system requesting an spf record. Should i add the same record
>> on the
On Mon, 2010-08-02 at 22:13 -0400, donovan jeffrey j wrote:
> Greetings
>
> i have an internal dns server it resolvs all my queries from the inside.
> I have a mail system requesting an spf record. Should i add the same record
> on the inside as i do for the outside ? i don't want internal addr
Greetings
i have an internal dns server it resolvs all my queries from the inside.
I have a mail system requesting an spf record. Should i add the same record on
the inside as i do for the outside ? i don't want internal address space to
mess with external.
i would say just place it on my exte
On 08/02/10 14:43, Denis BUCHER wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I have a simple question, when reloading Bind, I get these messages, and
> later on in the logs, the transfer seems to work with IPv4.
>
> Aug 2 23:24:13 cirrus named[1581]: network unreachable resolving
> '(host)/A/IN': 2001:620::4#53
> Aug
1. Zone has expired (to confirm: check logs)
2. Corrupted/truncated journal file (to confirm: check logs, or, shut
down gracefully, delete journal and start up again)
3. www.blah.com is a delegation in your slave copy of the zone, and the
delegated nameservers are all returning SERVFAIL, are lam
Dear all,
I have a simple question, when reloading Bind, I get these messages, and
later on in the logs, the transfer seems to work with IPv4.
Aug 2 23:24:13 cirrus named[1581]: network unreachable resolving
'(host)/A/IN': 2001:620::4#53
Aug 2 23:24:13 cirrus named[1581]: network unreachabl
Alan,
Nice to see some class lurking on this list! ;)
I don't see much of anything on this side other than the query portion:
...
02-Aug-2010 16:19:36.610 queries: info: client 172.xxx.xxx.xxx#1845:
query: www.blah.com IN A +
...
We're extremely limited on disk space on these servers, so we only
On 8/2/2010 10:17 AM, Atkins, Brian (GD/VA-NSOC) wrote:
> Any ideas to point me in the right direction?
What do the log files show surrounding the query?
AlanC
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-use
I'm troubleshooting an issue with internal resolution of a domain. I
have 2 identical slave servers that resolve for domains that have been
delegated to our group. However, while one of the servers can
successfully provide the responses, the other cannot. I've checked with
the network gurus to veri
11 matches
Mail list logo
