Re: Bind hang out when named reach to 5-600 Mb

2010-07-27 Thread khanh rua
Hi I attached the ouput from your command in 10s. Last time i tested, bind did reach to 1Gb but it still hang ( don't respond any query ). Could you help me take a look at this log? Duc Tien. From: Stacey Jonathan Marshall - Solaris Software To: khanh

Re: USADOTGOV.NET Root Problems?

2010-07-27 Thread Danny Mayer
On 7/26/2010 9:50 AM, Merton Campbell Crockett wrote: > > On Jul 25, 2010, at 3:34 PM, Kevin Oberman wrote: >> >> And, as tests start to include DNSSEC (and EDNS0) tests, the vendors will >> likely adjust defaults. Tests for DNSSEC are already appearing on >> federal systems (not a trivial part of

Re: Multiple masters expected behavior?

2010-07-27 Thread Peter Laws
\On 07/26/10 23:02, Barry Margolin wrote: In article, "Laws, Peter C." wrote: Understood, but what I'm asking about is that the slave does not appear to be losing contact with the first-listed master. In fact, from the logs, it appears to be flipping back and forth (though not round-robinni

Re: BIND integration with windows DNS

2010-07-27 Thread Barry Finkel
Arnoud Tijssen wrote: >I`m facing kind of a challenge. At the moment we have BIND and windows >DNS within our corporate network. > >I would like to get rid of windows DNS and switch completely over to >BIND, but since DNS is so intertwined with AD this is not an option >since it probably introduc

Re: BIND integration with windows DNS

2010-07-27 Thread Phil Mayers
On 07/27/2010 08:31 AM, Arnoud Tijssen wrote: From previous mail; Since I don`t want all dynamic updates from windows clients polluting my main zone file, but still want one primary DNS serving the main domain instead of two, BIND and windows, what it is the best option if there is one. Sor

RE: BIND integration with windows DNS

2010-07-27 Thread Arnoud Tijssen
>From previous mail; > > Since I don`t want all dynamic updates from windows clients polluting > my main zone file, but still want one primary DNS serving the main > domain instead of two, BIND and windows, what it is the best option > if there is one. Sorry - I don't follow. You say you don't w

Re: BIND integration with windows DNS

2010-07-27 Thread Phil Mayers
On 07/27/2010 08:17 AM, Kalman Feher wrote: Since I don`t want all dynamic updates from windows clients polluting my main zone file, but still want one primary DNS serving the main domain instead of two, BIND and windows, what it is the best option if there is one. Create a subdomain for your

Re: BIND integration with windows DNS

2010-07-27 Thread Kalman Feher
On 27/07/10 8:10 AM, "Arnoud Tijssen" wrote: > I`m facing kind of a challenge. At the moment we have BIND and windows DNS > within our corporate network. > > I would like to get rid of windows DNS and switch completely over to BIND, but > since DNS is so intertwined with AD this is not an opt

Re: BIND integration with windows DNS

2010-07-27 Thread Phil Mayers
On 07/27/2010 07:10 AM, Arnoud Tijssen wrote: I`m facing kind of a challenge. At the moment we have BIND and windows DNS within our corporate network. I would like to get rid of windows DNS and switch completely over to BIND, but since DNS is so intertwined with AD this is not an option since it

Bind dlz(mysql) with SRV Record

2010-07-27 Thread ShanyiWan
How to store SRV records in the database(mysql)? PRI、weight、port、target can be stored in data field? mysql> select zone,host,type,data from dns_records where zone='zzz.cn' and type='srv'; +++--+-+ | zone | host | type | data