Re: dnssec-lookaside auto and managed-keys-zone problem with certain views

2010-07-18 Thread Evan Hunt
> Well, it's a better work around than what I have been doing, but not > having the RFC 5011 behaviour is quite a disappointment. Now I have > presentiments of disaster should the DLV key have to be rolled for > whatever reason. Sorry, I misunderstood your question--I thought you wanted to know h

Re: root-anchor.xml & anchors.xml in Bind

2010-07-18 Thread Tony Finch
On Sat, 17 Jul 2010, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > > OK, let's rephrase it: as far as I know, the root managers did not > announce that they will follow RFC 5011. But may be they did and I > just missed the announcement or may be they will do it in the > future. But check yourself before using manag

Re: dnssec-lookaside auto and managed-keys-zone problem with certain views

2010-07-18 Thread Doug Barton
On 07/18/10 12:28, Matthew Seaman wrote: > Think I'll just drop the external-chaos view. Some script kiddie > working out I'm running the latest version of bind is likely to be lower > risk and a lot less harmful than dealing with broken dnssec chains of trust. I agree, and to take it one step fu

Re: dnssec-lookaside auto and managed-keys-zone problem with certain views

2010-07-18 Thread Rick Dicaire
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 3:28 PM, Matthew Seaman wrote: > Think I'll just drop the external-chaos view.  Some script kiddie > working out I'm running the latest version of bind is likely to be lower > risk and a lot less harmful than dealing with broken dnssec chains of trust. version none

Re: dnssec-lookaside auto and managed-keys-zone problem with certain views

2010-07-18 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 18/07/2010 17:58:15, Evan Hunt wrote: >> Is there a way of using dnssec-lookaside and forcing bind not to >> maintain a managed-keys-zone for certain views? > > Sure, just do it the old way, without "dnssec-lookaside auto". > Put these in the view statement: > > dnssec-lookaside . trus

Re: dnssec-lookaside auto and managed-keys-zone problem with certain views

2010-07-18 Thread Evan Hunt
> Is there a way of using dnssec-lookaside and forcing bind not to > maintain a managed-keys-zone for certain views? Sure, just do it the old way, without "dnssec-lookaside auto". Put these in the view statement: dnssec-lookaside . trust-anchor dlv.isc.org; trusted-keys {

Re: Slowness and timeouts resolving qa.pay.gov

2010-07-18 Thread Mark Andrews
In message <2aa71bedebcf80449e35b7b640700be43347b1b...@email4.uspto.gov>, "Lear , Karen (Evolver)" writes: > My recursive DNS servers are intermittently timing out and giving slow respon > ses to qa.pay.gov. I haven't noticed problems with any other sites. How can > I nail down where the proble

Re: reason for "expected covering NSEC3, got an exact match" ?

2010-07-18 Thread Mark Andrews
It's cosmetic. The final NSEC3 record proves the non-existance of the data or wildcard. With a nodata response we should be expecting the record. The following has been compiled but otherwise has not been tested. Mark Index: bin/named/query.c ==

dnssec-lookaside auto and managed-keys-zone problem with certain views

2010-07-18 Thread Matthew Seaman
Dear list, Is there a way of using dnssec-lookaside and forcing bind not to maintain a managed-keys-zone for certain views? Or allowing it to start up if the files are missing for some views? I have within my named.conf this view, designed to hide bind.version and so forth from the world at lar