Re: BIND 9.7.1 with dlz(mysql)

2010-06-29 Thread Mark Andrews
In message <201006301020006377...@114.com.cn>, "ShanyiWan" writes: > Cent OS 5.4(32bit) +mysql 5.1.48 > > # /usr/local/bind/sbin/named -c /usr/local/bind/etc/named.conf -u named -g -d > 1 > 30-Jun-2010 10:16:39.071 starting BIND 9.7.1 -c /usr/local/bind/etc/named.con > f -u named -g -d 1 > 30-J

BIND 9.7.1 with dlz(mysql)

2010-06-29 Thread ShanyiWan
Cent OS 5.4(32bit) +mysql 5.1.48 # /usr/local/bind/sbin/named -c /usr/local/bind/etc/named.conf -u named -g -d 1 30-Jun-2010 10:16:39.071 starting BIND 9.7.1 -c /usr/local/bind/etc/named.conf -u named -g -d 1 30-Jun-2010 10:16:39.071 built with '--prefix=/usr/local/bind' '--with-dlz-mysql=/usr/

Re: slave server

2010-06-29 Thread Kevin Darcy
On 6/29/2010 5:36 PM, Fred Zinsli wrote: Hi everyone Very new to bind (or dns for that matter). I am wanting to know if there is a way to setup a slave only server for my network. I would like it to simply act as a secondary server should the main server fail. Would these "main" and "sec

RE: Unable to resolve several hosts

2010-06-29 Thread Baird, Josh
Ok, so I answered my own question. It was indeed our ASA's at the border. Thanks, Josh -Original Message- From: bind-users-bounces+jbaird=follett@lists.isc.org [mailto:bind-users-bounces+jbaird=follett@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Baird, Josh Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 4:55 PM

Unable to resolve several hosts

2010-06-29 Thread Baird, Josh
Hi, We have clients that have started to report that they are not able to resolve certain hosts from our recursing/caching resolvers (BIND 9.3.6-4/EL5). I am wondering if this has something to do with EDNS or the DNSSEC rollout to root servers on May 5th.. or perhaps with our Cisco ASA's at the e

slave server

2010-06-29 Thread Fred Zinsli
Hi everyone Very new to bind (or dns for that matter). I am wanting to know if there is a way to setup a slave only server for my network. I would like it to simply act as a secondary server should the main server fail. I would also like the slave server to automatically add any (all) new domai

Re: BIND 9.7.1-P1 planned to address issues in BIND 9.7.0 and 9.7.1

2010-06-29 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 28.06.10 13:31, Larissa Shapiro wrote: > We have received reports that BIND 9.7.0 and 9.7.1 are failing to > resolve certain zones. These zones are resolved correctly by earlier > versions of BIND. > > BIND 9.7.0 and 9.7.1 follows the DNS protocol more strictly than > earlier versions. We felt

Re: Bind DLZ/DNAME problem

2010-06-29 Thread Klaus Malorny
On 29/06/10 02:53, Mark Andrews wrote: [...] I would remove the following from lib/dns/sdlz.c:find(). /* * Unless this is an explicit lookup at the origin, don't * look at the origin. */ if (i == olabels&&