In message <20100622155814.gd4...@puga.deis.gldn.net>, Anatoly Pugachev writes:
> Mark,
>
> please see below...
>
> On 04.05.2010 / 14:31:25 +1000, Mark Andrews wrote:
> >
> > In message
> , Je
> > ff Pang writes:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Following the discussions in the list, I made a test o
Thanks Bill.
I'm well aware of dns-oarc tests...
but they are no more than firewall / dns packet size tests.
My idea/concern is what could be wrong/broken (except of DNSSEC), if we
disable eDNS on our servers - I need to carry this idea to my collegue.
My quick test show that disabling edns per
another example:
dig +short rs.dns-oarc.net txt
rst.x3827.rs.dns-oarc.net.
rst.x3837.x3827.rs.dns-oarc.net.
rst.x3843.x3837.x3827.rs.dns-oarc.net.
"Tested at 2010-06-22 17:11:44 UTC"
"169.199.1.1 sent EDNS buffer size 4096"
"169.199.1.1 DNS reply size limit is at least 3843"
--- On Tue, 6/22/10,
Mark,
please see below...
On 04.05.2010 / 14:31:25 +1000, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> In message ,
> Je
> ff Pang writes:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Following the discussions in the list, I made a test on one of our
> > servers, which is in an ISP's datacenter.
> >
> > The result is below:
> >
> > $ di
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 05:31:59PM +0200, Rok Poto??nik wrote:
> Anyway.. I found out what the problem is... they don't reply to dnssec
> enabled requests...
>
> $ dig +short @ns33.domaincontrol.com. replacementservices.com.
> 72.32.12.235
>
> $ dig +short +dnssec @ns33.domaincontrol.com. replac
Hi all,
Did anyone configured/hacked bind to reflect the ip address of the
querying resolver as whoami.ultradns.net is doing?
Cheers,
--Ricardo
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
On 22.6.2010 2:16, Mark Andrews wrote:
I suspect that your firewall is dropping replies to EDNS queries
that *don't* include the OPT record (i.e. they are plain DNS not
EDNS responses). Note that there was no OPT record in the reply.
I hardly think that my firewall configuration is faulty bec
7 matches
Mail list logo
