Hi,
During AXFR of a zone, the zone.dbfile is not created till the AXFR
completes. Till AXFR completes, the file name will be some value as
456eefwfc. Is it correct behavior?
Thanks & Regards,
Ramesh
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
h
On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 03:40:31PM +, Paul Vixie wrote:
> Chris Thompson writes:
>
> > Nothing that I can see. Maybe dnsviz can't cope with multiple PTR
> > records in an RRset, as your first case has? (On the other hand it
> > handles multiple A records in forward zones OK.)
>
> to be fair,
On 06/02/10 01:31, Techi wrote:
but, my question is still not answered.
Why on earth such huge defference in the number of connections on the firewall
with the max-cache-size on and off? I still don't get it.
Imagine the cache as a bucket. With a large bucket the chances of the
answer that any
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/06/2010 18:49:44, Casey Deccio wrote:
> This has been fixed. The problem had to do with establishing a canonical
> ordering of RRs within an RRset for the purposes of verifying an RRSIG.
> dnspython's default comparison operators don't follow ca
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 7:44 AM, Chris Thompson wrote:
> On Jun 2 2010, Matthew Seaman wrote:
>
> I'm DNSSEC enabling the .ip6.arpa zone for my IPv6 allocation and
>> registering it with dlv.isc.org. Using bind-9.7.0-p2 dnssec tools.
>>
>> Everything seems to be working well, but when I test usi
What exactly are you expecting to see there? NS records for the root
zone? Is this *non-recursive* nameserver obligated to give out NS and/or
SOA records for the root zone in the Authority Section? I think not.
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 8:40 AM, Paul Vixie wrote:
> Chris Thompson writes:
>
> > Nothing that I can see. Maybe dnsviz can't cope with multiple PTR
> > records in an RRset, as your first case has? (On the other hand it
> > handles multiple A records in forward zones OK.)
>
> to be fair, multiple
Chris Thompson writes:
> Nothing that I can see. Maybe dnsviz can't cope with multiple PTR
> records in an RRset, as your first case has? (On the other hand it
> handles multiple A records in forward zones OK.)
to be fair, multiple PTR RRs is something we added in BIND gethostbyaddr()
in more or
hi all,
I am trying to build a pure IPv6 network for my university. Now I wanna to
build a Bind-based DNS server. Because I am using NAT-PT for IPv4 accessing,
I must get the A record from my ISP's DNS server and add a special prefix to
it. Could you tell me how to config my bind to do this? thx!
_
On Jun 2 2010, Matthew Seaman wrote:
I'm DNSSEC enabling the .ip6.arpa zone for my IPv6 allocation and
registering it with dlv.isc.org. Using bind-9.7.0-p2 dnssec tools.
Everything seems to be working well, but when I test using the Sandia
Labs dnsviz.net tool I get inconsistent results.
My m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm DNSSEC enabling the .ip6.arpa zone for my IPv6 allocation and
registering it with dlv.isc.org. Using bind-9.7.0-p2 dnssec tools.
Everything seems to be working well, but when I test using the Sandia
Labs dnsviz.net tool I get inconsistent result
On 02.06.10 16:20, Elias wrote:
> Does anyone know how BIND chooses which authoritative server to refer to?
> When a referal returns ns1.abc.com, ns2.abc.com and ns3.abc.com, will the
> recursive server randomly send out a request to either ns1, ns2 or ns3 or
> is there a selection algorithm?
t
On Wed 02 of Jun 2010 00:45:42 you wrote:
> One obvious solution to keeping the firewall guys happy would just be
> to make them not burn state entries for the nameserver at all
> Firewalls in front of nameservers cause an ungodly amount of issues
> for no real benefit...
I will transfer that
Hi guys,
Does anyone know how BIND chooses which authoritative server to refer to?
When a referal returns ns1.abc.com, ns2.abc.com and ns3.abc.com, will the
recursive server randomly send out a request to either ns1, ns2 or ns3 or is
there a selection algorithm?
I've got a problem resolving
14 matches
Mail list logo
