Re: add a record into signed zone

2010-05-12 Thread Mark Andrews
In message , rams writes: > > Hi, > How to add a record into signed zone using nsupdate. Is there any additional > arguments need to be passed for getting RRSIG of addition record or > automatically bind will take care? > > Thanks & Regards, > Ramesh Named will take care of it. Mark -- Mark

add a record into signed zone

2010-05-12 Thread rams
Hi, How to add a record into signed zone using nsupdate. Is there any additional arguments need to be passed for getting RRSIG of addition record or automatically bind will take care? Thanks & Regards, Ramesh ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.

Re: rndc flush(more-than-one)name

2010-05-12 Thread Mark Andrews
In message , Chris Thom pson writes: > Arising out of today's little accident with the "de" TLD ... > > Am I right in thinking that "rndc flushname de" flushes only entries for > that specific name, and not for names in the tree *under* "de"? It would > be rather useful to have the latter facilit

Re: Master server offline

2010-05-12 Thread Peter Laws
On 05/08/10 17:36, Chris Thompson as IP Register wrote: On May 7 2010, Peter Laws wrote: If he has a small number of slaves, the OP may not need a Tardis. It's If you do this, you need to restart BIND on the slave to have it notice the change. Similarly you can "touch" the zone file to mak

rndc flush(more-than-one)name

2010-05-12 Thread Chris Thompson
Arising out of today's little accident with the "de" TLD ... Am I right in thinking that "rndc flushname de" flushes only entries for that specific name, and not for names in the tree *under* "de"? It would be rather useful to have the latter facility (short of flushing the whole cache). Of cour

Re: Allowing recursion for just specific zones

2010-05-12 Thread Chris Buxton
Close. I mean a properly-configured instance of squid, or a SOCKS proxy, or whatever other non-DNS, application level proxy you want to provide. Just configure your kiosks to use them. Then the kiosks themselves don't need DNS resolution at all. Chris Buxton BlueCat Networks On 5/12/10, Brian Can

Re: Issues following 9.3.5-p1 upgrade to 9.7.0-p1 Windows VMware environment

2010-05-12 Thread Danny Mayer
rsm...@osc.gov.on.ca wrote: > We have been running Bind 9.3.5-P1 on Windows 2003 guest in VMware ESX > 3.5 environment for many years with no issues. Following an upgrade to > Bind 9.7.0-p1 we are experiencing a couple of issues. No Bind > configuration changes were made to config files other than

Re: Allowing recursion for just specific zones

2010-05-12 Thread Brian Candler
> Or else set up secure proxies and disallow all DNS resolution (an > empty root zone). I'm not sure what you mean by "secure proxies". Do you mean some non-BIND software capable of forwarding and filtering DNS queries/responses? If so, do you have anything particular in mind? Thanks, Brian. __