Re: BIND doesn't run on XP

Pedro Rafael Sánchez Aranda wrote: > **Hello, > > I'm new on BIND, and I tried to install and configure both 9.7.0-P1 and > 9.6.2-P1 versions on a Windows XP SP3. In both cases they were correct > installations but they produce the same error: > starting BIND 9.x.x-P1 -g > built with default > fou

Re: BIND doesn't run on XP

In message <765500.82688...@web32004.mail.mud.yahoo.com>, =?utf-8?B?UGVkcm8gUmF mYWVsIFPDoW5jaGV6IEFyYW5kYQ==?= writes: > > Hello, I'm new on BIND, and I tried to install and configure both 9= > .7.0-P1 and 9.6.2-P1 versions on a Windows XP SP3. You get this sort of error on Windows 2000. Win

BIND doesn't run on XP

Hello, I'm new on BIND, and I tried to install and configure both 9.7.0-P1 and 9.6.2-P1 versions on a Windows XP SP3. In both cases they were correct installations but they produce the same error: starting BIND 9.x.x-P1 -g built with default found 1 CPU, using 1 worker thread .\socket.c:639: IN

Re: Error fetching SOA

Part of this fixed itself when I power cycled the darn gateway router. I have no idea what happened there. I feel like a dog chasing my tail today. Thank you Warren and Alan for helping me out. On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Warren Kumari wrote: > wkum...@lisa:~$ ping 71.12.99.115 > PING 71.12

Re: Error fetching SOA

wkum...@lisa:~$ ping 71.12.99.115 PING 71.12.99.115 (71.12.99.115) 56(84) bytes of data. --- 71.12.99.115 ping statistics --- 5 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 4016ms wkum...@lisa:~$ dig SOA castor.lazarusalliance.com @71.12.99.115 ; <<>> DiG 9.7.0-P1 <<>> SOA castor.laz

Re: Error fetching SOA from

michael peters wrote: > [71.12.99.115], request timed out. > Probably DNS server is offline. > [71.12.99.116], request timed out. > Probably DNS server is offline. Neither of these servers respond to queries. acl...@yellow:

Re: Error fetching SOA

Here is more information. I'm testing my external BIND 9.6.1 systems with http://www.checkdns.net/powercheck.aspx. Outbound resolution is fine. Internal resolution is fine. External resolution seems to be the problem. My firewall allows port 53 UDP and TCP. The messages I get are: Found NS recor

Re: Error fetching SOA

Here are the configuration files. # more named.conf include "/etc/bind/named.conf.options"; // prime the server with knowledge of the root servers zone "." { type hint; file "/etc/bind/db.root"; }; // be authoritative for the localhost forward and reverse zones, and for // broad

Error fetching SOA from

I'm testing my external BIND 9.6.1 systems with http://www.checkdns.net/powercheck.aspx. Outbound resolution is fine. Internal resolution is fine. External resolution seems to be the problem. My firewall allows port 53 UDP and TCP. The messages I get are: Found NS record: castor.lazarusalliance.c

Re: Error fetching SOA

michael peters wrote: > Is it a problem to get a message from a DNS checking tool that indicates > "Error fetching SOA from ns1.example.com ?" Both > of my external BIND 9.6.1 servers respond the same way and I'm assuming > that I need to add something to my configuration.

Re: Error fetching SOA

On Mar 21, 2010, at 11:21 AM, michael peters wrote: Is it a problem to get a message from a DNS checking tool that indicates "Error fetching SOA from ns1.example.com?" Both of my external BIND 9.6.1 servers respond the same way and I'm assuming that I need to add something to my configurati

Error fetching SOA

Is it a problem to get a message from a DNS checking tool that indicates "Error fetching SOA from ns1.example.com?" Both of my external BIND 9.6.1 servers respond the same way and I'm assuming that I need to add something to my configuration. Please advise.

Re: dnssec signing tools

> I should have been more specific.. What dnssec tools do the folks at ISC > recommend.. I am scheduled for a 5 day class in Arlington, VA in May 2010 The ones we provide are dnssec-keygen and dnssec-signzone, which are included with BIND. Also, named itself--as of BIND 9.7.0, it can sign your

Re: BIND9 Internal Reverse Look-ups Fail

On 03/21/10 08:29, michael peters wrote: > That did the trick! Thank you so much for your assistance. Glad it worked out for you. Doug -- ... and that's just a little bit of history repeating. -- Propellerheads Improve the effectiveness of your Internet

Re: PTR format question

On Mar 21, 2010, at 2:22 AM, Barry Margolin wrote: In article , groups wrote: I did not know there were MACROs available.. as I just inheirited this legacy system less than one month ago.. There aren't macros, just one special tool for creating a block of DNS entries that contain sequent

Re: BIND9 Internal Reverse Look-ups Fail

That did the trick! Thank you so much for your assistance. On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 8:28 PM, Doug Barton wrote: > On 03/20/10 17:11, michael peters wrote: > > > zone "0.253.150.10.in-addr.arpa" in { > > type master; > > file "/etc/bind/10.150.253.0.rev"; > > }; > > zone "0

Re: PTR format question

Barry Margolin wrote, On 03/21/2010 04:22 AM: In article , groups wrote: I did not know there were MACROs available.. as I just inheirited this legacy system less than one month ago.. There aren't macros, just one special tool for creating a block of DNS entries that contain sequen

Re: PTR format question

In article , groups wrote: > I did not know there were MACROs available.. as I just inheirited this > legacy system less than one month ago.. There aren't macros, just one special tool for creating a block of DNS entries that contain sequential numbers in them. What does it being a legacy sy