Hello everyone,
I'm currently using an ACL for allow-query statement, which I thought it's fine.
Recently I did a spoofability test on:
https://www.grc.com/dns/dns.htm
and the results came up with a statement that "External Queries are REJECTED"
and "It would be better for it to ignore extern
On Mar 19, 2010, at 3:35 PM, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> PIX, you say? They used to have a problem with DNS UDP packets over 512
> bytes. (Well, it didn't have a "problem", it just blocked them. I'm not
> sure what, if any code version fixes this. (I don't have any these days.)
6.3 fixed it. The comm
> From: Glenn English
> Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 15:15:38 -0600
> Sender: bind-users-bounces+oberman=es@lists.isc.org
>
>
> On Mar 19, 2010, at 2:30 PM, Lightner, Jeff wrote:
>
> > Maybe it's a difference between udp and tcp in your firewall?
> >
> > For most queries udp 53 is used but for
On Mar 19, 2010, at 2:30 PM, Lightner, Jeff wrote:
> Maybe it's a difference between udp and tcp in your firewall?
>
> For most queries udp 53 is used but for long packets it might switch to
> tcp 53 - since you're doing an any you're going to get a lot more data.
Don't think so. The router's
Maybe it's a difference between udp and tcp in your firewall?
For most queries udp 53 is used but for long packets it might switch to
tcp 53 - since you're doing an any you're going to get a lot more data.
-Original Message-
From: bind-users-bounces+jlightner=water@lists.isc.org
[m
I posted this to the postfix users list:
One of my users had problems receiving from Yahoo a couple days ago. The sender
(in FLA) got this:
>> From: "mailer-dae...@yahoo.com"
>> To: xx...@yahoo.com
>> Sent: Sun, March 7, 2010 5:51:09 PM
>> Subject: failure notice
>>
>> Hi. This is the qmail-se
On Mar 19 2010, David Ford wrote:
BIND has long had issues with threading since it started supporting
threaded operation. I recommend you simply recompile without thread
support.
I retry compiling with thread support about twice a year and as of late
last year, BIND still hung soon after resta
BIND has long had issues with threading since it started supporting
threaded operation. I recommend you simply recompile without thread
support.
I retry compiling with thread support about twice a year and as of late
last year, BIND still hung soon after restart with threading enabled.
-david
O
Hi,
We have several recursive cache bind servers and experiencing weird things
when named is compiled with-threads:
In 4 steps:
1) everything goes ok
2) for ~1h named began to answer slower (0,5ms to >100ms) and with symptoms:
- load increase on the server (from 0,3 to >4)
- number of recur
9 matches
Mail list logo
