In message <20100131220833.a16...@gwyn.tux.org>, Joseph S D Yao writes:
> The ARM, in Chapter 6, under Boolean Options [for some value of the word
> "Boolean", I guess ;-)], says:
Well it started out as a Boolean Option. :-)
Boolean/Enumerated Options would be a more accurate description these da
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 10:11:43PM -0500, Frank Cusack wrote:
...
> hosts. zytrax does say that also-notify only applies to type master
> servers however I can't find confirmation of that anywhere else.
...
I don't believe that this is the case - I'm using them on servers
serving copies of the z
On 29.01.10 22:11, Frank Cusack wrote:
> I have also-notify configured for a slave zone. The real master is a
> so-called stealth master and all other slaves must consult this slave
> nameserver that has also-notify configured.
>
> The slave doesn't appear to be sending NOTIFY messages to the also
In message , Frank Cusack
writes:
> On February 1, 2010 11:35:15 AM +1100 Mark Andrews wrote:
> > You need to be looking a debug 3.
> >
> > notify_log(notify->zone, ISC_LOG_DEBUG(3), "sending notify to %s",
> >addrbuf);
>
> ouch, debug 3 is probably way TMI. I guess
On February 1, 2010 11:35:15 AM +1100 Mark Andrews wrote:
You need to be looking a debug 3.
notify_log(notify->zone, ISC_LOG_DEBUG(3), "sending notify to %s",
addrbuf);
ouch, debug 3 is probably way TMI. I guess I'll just patch the above
to log at info. Why isn't
In message , Frank Cusack
writes:
> How can I get logs of all NOTIFY messages sent?
>
> logging {
> // use local0 instead of daemon
> channel local0_syslog {
> syslog local0;
> severity info;
> };
> category notify{ local0_syslog; default_debug; };
> };
>
> The above only ge
Firstly, I feel this really belongs on mailops not bind list :)
secondly...
On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 00:00 +0300, Wael Shaheen wrote:
> Blocking port 25 is much worse IMHO because it forces users out of the
> service, by restricting their ability to use their own mail servers that can
> be hosted e
In message , Wael Shaheen writes:
> Dear DNS Experts,
>
> This post is intended for discussion.
>
> The ISP I work for has HUGE dynamic IP pools that are full of spammers (of
> course). This huge volume of spam is actually influencing the decision for
> some of the international provider=B9s whe
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 8:25 AM, Wael Shaheen wrote:
> As a solution the routing team was thinking to block port 25 for outgoing as
> some ISPs do. However, I do not see this to be a valid solution for many
> reasons such as clients that have email servers outside, or if decided to be
> redirecte
At 05:25 31-01-10, Wael Shaheen wrote:
As a solution the routing team was thinking to block port 25 for outgoing as
some ISPs do. However, I do not see this to be a valid solution for many
reasons such as clients that have email servers outside, or if decided to be
redirected to spam filters then
Hi,
On 1/31/10 5:28 PM, "Sten Carlsen" wrote:
> To me this seems to be a firewall/routing issue. If you know for sure
> that some IP is sending spam, if you can not stop them, then at least
> you can block their outgoing access to port 25.
Most of the RBLs list dynamic IP addresses for they sh
Hi,
On 1/31/10 5:17 PM, "Sven Eschenberg" wrote:
> Dear Wael,
>
> In what way is blocking Port 25 any worse than blocking MX/root queries
> for clients? Both solutions neglect the fact, that spam is not a technical
> problem.
This spam issue is major for DSPs and large ISPs. Their reputation
To me this seems to be a firewall/routing issue. If you know for sure
that some IP is sending spam, if you can not stop them, then at least
you can block their outgoing access to port 25.
Alternatively and maybe better arrange for a proxy server to do
filtering and discard spam. The proxy solution
Dear Wael,
In what way is blocking Port 25 any worse than blocking MX/root queries
for clients? Both solutions neglect the fact, that spam is not a technical
problem.
Some ISPs think it is a good idea to forward you to a search web page,
when you mispell some URL, this is done via DNS. Obviously,
Dear DNS Experts,
This post is intended for discussion.
The ISP I work for has HUGE dynamic IP pools that are full of spammers (of
course). This huge volume of spam is actually influencing the decision for
some of the international provider¹s whether to give us links or not let
alone the bad repu
15 matches
Mail list logo
