Re: Forward sub-domains to another domain

yes, for sure, if author wants to forward all subdomains of a particular domain. 2010/1/27 moto kawasaki > > > CNAME is what you need > > or DNAME, isn't it? > > ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinf

Re: Forward sub-domains to another domain

> CNAME is what you need or DNAME, isn't it? -- moto kawasaki ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Re: Forward sub-domains to another domain

CNAME is what you need 2010/1/27 Xico leite > Hi all, > > someone knows how to forward a sub-domain to another domain thru bind?... > i mean i have cache.leite.us and i want to point to leite4.uni.cc, how can > i do that?... > > Thank you! > > ___ > bi

Forward sub-domains to another domain

Hi all, someone knows how to forward a sub-domain to another domain thru bind?... i mean i have cache.leite.us and i want to point to leite4.uni.cc, how can i do that?... Thank you! ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.

RE: is it possible to dynamically update an RRSIG record?

>Jack Tavares wrote: >> Looking at the code for libbind, specifically >> res_nmkupdate, >> there is no case statement for RRSIG records. >> >> In this case, I was trying to update the TTL. >> Is that not allowed intentionally? > >I think so. The TTL of a RRSIG RR *MUST* match the TTL value of th

Name resolution follows forwarders instead of delegations on master server

I've noticed that if I have default forwarders setup in the options section of my named.conf, then BIND (9.4.1-P1) will forward to these servers rather than following the delegations for zones where it's authoritative (verified via sniffer trace). Is this true of all BIND versions? In my case, th

Re: update failed: SERVFAIL

In message <2ac8e9ad1001250710s2489d1edpf5a247341bc2a...@mail.gmail.com>, xu do ng writes: > Hi, >I have a problem about the DDNS ,When I nsupdated the master dns server > under with dnssec,but it failed as following: > > *r...@root:/var/named/chroot/etc# nsupdate -d > > server 192.168.225.13

Re: Delegation question!

Also you did not *buy* the addresses from RIPE as RIPE does not *sell* addresses. You leased the addressed from RIPE. Mark -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org __

AW: Disabling recursion causes browser hangs on clients with auto proxy config

Thanks very much to everyone who replied and explained this set of problems in such detail to me. It's now clear as day and of course you are correct. You have made my day. :-) As for "allow-query" instead of "allow-recursion" - I see what you mean, the stub resolvers seem to react differently to