RE: A question about PTR records

2010-01-24 Thread Alans
Thanks Mark. -Original Message- From: bind-users-bounces+batpower83=yahoo.co...@lists.isc.org [mailto:bind-users-bounces+batpower83=yahoo.co...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Mark Andrews Sent: Monday, January 25, 2010 2:11 AM To: sasa sasa Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org Subject: Re: A questio

Re: rndc stalls on any command -- maybe because 127.0.0.1 is not in routing table?

2010-01-24 Thread Nicholas Tung
Thanks very much! $(ifconfig lo up) fixed the first problem. I'm curious why the init script relies on this socket connection, and that it got a timeout instead of immediate failure because the interface wasn't up. [For anyone who has the same problem], it's necessary to run $(killall rpcbind name

Re: BIND 9.6.1-P3 using more resources?

2010-01-24 Thread Mark Andrews
In message , Chris Thomp son writes: > On Friday, I wrote: > > >We upgraded our main recursive nameservers (validating, via dlv.isc.org) > >from 9.6.1-P2 to 9.6.1-P3 a couple of days ago. CPU (and possibly memory) > >consumption have been quite a bit larger since then, and more worryingly, > >see

Re: A question about PTR records

2010-01-24 Thread Mark Andrews
In message <139200.61342...@web110505.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>, sasa sasa writes: > > Hi, > What is the best practice when using PTR in an ISP? is it dividing IP block= > s (like; x.x.x.in-addr.arpa.) and therefore having more than one PTR zo= > ne file? or just use x.in-addr.arpa.and include everythi

A question about PTR records

2010-01-24 Thread sasa sasa
Hi, What is the best practice when using PTR in an ISP? is it dividing IP blocks (like; x.x.x.in-addr.arpa.) and therefore having more than one PTR zone file? or just use x.in-addr.arpa.and include everything inside that file? regards, ___ bind-

Re: rndc stalls on any command -- maybe because 127.0.0.1 is not in routing table?

2010-01-24 Thread Rick Dicaire
Is lo up? Is named actually listening on 127.0.0.1:953? Is there a firewall? On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 1:29 PM, Nicholas Tung wrote: > Hi all, > >    The rndc tool, which is used for all BIND configuration (yast, > /etc/init.d/named stop), appears to stall on any command. See [Listing > 1] for outp

rndc stalls on any command -- maybe because 127.0.0.1 is not in routing table?

2010-01-24 Thread Nicholas Tung
Hi all, The rndc tool, which is used for all BIND configuration (yast, /etc/init.d/named stop), appears to stall on any command. See [Listing 1] for output before it stalls ("freezes" not in the DNS zone sense) and [Listing 2] for afterwards. I used lsof to show the open files [Listing 3]

Re: BIND 9.6.1-P3 using more resources?

2010-01-24 Thread Chris Thompson
On Friday, I wrote: We upgraded our main recursive nameservers (validating, via dlv.isc.org) from 9.6.1-P2 to 9.6.1-P3 a couple of days ago. CPU (and possibly memory) consumption have been quite a bit larger since then, and more worryingly, seems to be gradually increasing. I have looked for a