Re: BIND 9.6 - IXFR to slaves not working after manual zone edit.

First of all, decide where you want the delta to be computed. On the master or on the slaves? Currently you are asking all servers to compute the delta. Secondly if you are not using dynamic update to modify the master zone you don't need to freeze the master zone as named is NOT writing to it.

Re: Strange CNAME issue

In message , seren writes: > > Thanks for your response. I didn't know about the +trace option in dig. = > After some more searching, I believe you are correct about the long = > responses being related. The responses that fail all seem to exceed = > 512-bytes. Why this would happen in multiple l

BIND 9.6 - IXFR to slaves not working after manual zone edit.

Hi folks, According to DNS and BIND (the book) and other sources, BIND from 9.3 on is able to calculate differences for a zone file that is manually edited by using the following methodology: rndc freeze perform-updates-on-the-zone-file rndc thaw http://books.google.com/books?id=HggtWI1Shv

Re: Fatal Error in resolver.c

Thank you very much for your bug report. For your information, you can also submit bugs to our bind9-bugs AT isc.org email address. Your issue is now being tracked as ticket # 20923. ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.

Re: named 9.6.1 Filling wtmp

In message <6b845b73-065f-4e8b-afa5-408ecdbe7...@govnet.state.vt.us>, David Kre indler writes: > We have BIND 9.6.1-P3 running on several AIX 5.3 servers. On one of them, nam > ed is filling /var/adm/wtmp with numerous entries like the following. This is not named (the program). It may be "su" o

Re: Added new master zone, copy .hosts does not replicate properly

On 1/21/10 3:40 PM, Ryan S wrote: So my setup has been working great modifying existing zones adding and removing records. But when I add a new zone, it apparently does not work. So I think I am missing an important file that lists all the zones BIND uses? What BIND file am I needing to copy

Added new master zone, copy .hosts does not replicate properly

We run 2 BIND in master/master configuration in two geographically separate datacenters. This is done because a master/slave configuration has certain limitations if the master goes down (slave can not be easily modified). The setup we have works great -- we make changes to "A" or "MX" reco

Re: Strange CNAME issue

Thanks for your response. I didn't know about the +trace option in dig. After some more searching, I believe you are correct about the long responses being related. The responses that fail all seem to exceed 512-bytes. Why this would happen in multiple locations is a mystery but perhaps our fire

named 9.6.1 Filling wtmp

We have BIND 9.6.1-P3 running on several AIX 5.3 servers. On one of them, named is filling /var/adm/wtmp with numerous entries like the following. user pts/1 pts/1 7 1327240 1264089183 host-NN.domain Thu Jan 21 10:53:03 EST 2010 named 8 2572472 1264089217

Re: Notify "storms"

I agree - we are removing 1/2 the masters in a couple weeks to help things. Slaves only talk to masters, there are no "slaves of slaves" as we refer to them. Our architecture goal has been uniformity among the configurations, and this is part of the price we pay for that. At a functional level,