Niobos wrote:
> As soon as I activate DLV (besides the manual SEP I entered), the "removed"
> behaviour changes:
> * First lookup still returns SERVFAIL
> * Subsequent lookups now return NXDOMAIN with the AD flag *set*! (log
> confirms that my domain is not in the DLV and hence is insecure)
Tha
Hi all,
Can anyone please tell me is there any other command by which i can
stop the name-server without loosing the recent updates. I know that I can
do this by issuing 'rndc stop' but for some reason I am not able to . What
are the different ways by which I can have the same benefits as t
Jukka Pakkanen wrote:
>Thanks. Those 6 zones are subdomains to company.local so I guess they
>are covered. What about the _msdcs.company.local, is that needed in
>slaves?
If the zone
company.local
is mastered on a MX Windows DNS Server, then that zone will contain
the records that would
Chris Thompson wrote:
On Dec 7 2009, Kevin Darcy wrote:
[...snip...]
Or, you can run a script on the slaves which consults some
centralized "zone slaving database" to determine what zones to slave,
or to stop slaving. This "zone slaving database" can take many forms.
One idea is to represent
Chris Buxton kirjoitti:
On Dec 7, 2009, at 2:47 PM, Jukka Pakkanen wrote:
I have out Bind servers running as slaves to Windows 2008 DNS server, and it's
working fine as far as I can see (except that the slaves after a period of
times lose the data and never update it unless restart the Bind
On 08 Dec 2009, at 15:18, Hauke Lampe wrote:
> Niobos wrote:
>
>> When requesting a lookup of "removed", I get a SERVFAIL as well. However,
>> every subsequent request for "removed" gets an NXDOMAIN. (dig outputs below)
>> Flushing the caches on the RR with "rndc flush" causes the first request t
On Fri, 4 Dec 2009, Chris Thompson wrote:
>
> [It's never been entirely clear to me why these functions have to be
> combined, especially given that "server [ipaddr/len] {bogus yes;};"
> can be used to block outgoing queries.]
The CIDR syntax for server clauses is relatively new. Before it was add
Niobos wrote:
> When requesting a lookup of "removed", I get a SERVFAIL as well. However,
> every subsequent request for "removed" gets an NXDOMAIN. (dig outputs below)
> Flushing the caches on the RR with "rndc flush" causes the first request to
> be a SERVFAIL again.
I cannot reproduce this b
Hello Howard, hello Solaris Users,
It's there : http://sunfreeware.com
Many thank's to Steven M. Christensen
Greetings
Martin
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
In message <2ac8e9ad0912072303u6327b50eoc06cbfe232632...@mail.gmail.com>, xu
dong writes:
>
> Hi folks, i have a question about signing zone files with the ksk and the
> zsk, as i know,when signing the zone files i have to use the ksk and zsk
> both,just as following:
>
> *dnssec-signzone -o do
On Dec 8, 2009, at 2:03 AM, xu dong wrote:
> Hi folks, i have a question about signing zone files with the ksk and the
> zsk, as i know,when signing the zone files i have to use the ksk and zsk
> both,just as following:
>
> dnssec-signzone -o domain-name -t -k KSK zone-name ZSK
> but i want to
On Dec 7, 2009, at 2:47 PM, Jukka Pakkanen wrote:
> I have out Bind servers running as slaves to Windows 2008 DNS server, and
> it's working fine as far as I can see (except that the slaves after a period
> of times lose the data and never update it unless restart the Bind process,
> but that's
On Dec 7 2009, Kevin Darcy wrote:
[...snip...]
Or, you can run a script on the slaves which consults some centralized
"zone slaving database" to determine what zones to slave, or to stop
slaving. This "zone slaving database" can take many forms. One idea is
to represent this list as a special
Does anybody have a magic configure description of what is needed to build
Bind-9.6.1-P2 on Solaris 10 using native compilers and supporting the dlz-ldap
features.
When I run under our environment I get the following errors from the build.
"../../contrib/dlz/drivers/dlz_ldap_driver.c", line 1
14 matches
Mail list logo
