Re: Regarding EDNS Responses.

2009-10-27 Thread Mark Andrews
In message <001501ca5785$257c7220$21011...@china.huawei.com>, Ashwin writes: > > Hi All, > > RFC 2671 mentions in Section 5.3 > > Responders who do not understand these protocol extensions are > expected to send a response with RCODE NOTIMPL, FORMERR, or > SERVFAIL. > > However the above ment

2 simultaneous hung Bind boxes

2009-10-27 Thread Justin Shore
I got a call from a remote tech earlier this evening. He was at home on our service and couldn't get on the Internet. His IP connectivity was fine and could hit my NOC website via IP only. DNS however was hosed. About the time I got in a position to check the bind logs and sniff his traffic

Regarding EDNS Responses.

2009-10-27 Thread Ashwin
Hi All, RFC 2671 mentions in Section 5.3 Responders who do not understand these protocol extensions are expected to send a response with RCODE NOTIMPL, FORMERR, or SERVFAIL. However the above mentioned error codes are shared [SERVFAIL, NOTIMPL] are shared, so how do we ascertain t

Re: call for testers (Re: ISC BIND 9.7.0b1 is now available)

2009-10-27 Thread JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
At Mon, 26 Oct 2009 11:42:53 -0400, "Gerry Scott" wrote: > OpenSolaris build 125 includes execinfo.h within the /usr/include directory. > Also, backtrace() functionality has been included within the OS since build > 63. > > http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6536146 Okay