In message , "Bill Larson" writes:
> John Horne said:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I noticed one of the root servers stats
> > ( http://stats.l.root-servers.org/cgi-bin/dsc-grapher.pl?
> window=604800&plot=qtype_vs_invalid_tld&server=L-root ) of queried invalid
> TLDs, as at the moment we have no 'loc
About a year ago, in message , Matus Uhlar
noted that it was probably a bind BUG when Aliet Santiesteban Sifontes
had a lot of bogus EDNS0 failures when his named repeatedly timed out
and closed pending requests after only 600ms, even though the hardcoded
timeout in the source code (bin/named/clien
On Aug 28, 2009, at 8:59 AM, Dave Sparro wrote:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Niall
O'Reilly wrote:
Lisa Casey wrote:
Aug 26 12:48:56 netlink named[295]: client 207.191.185.6#60614: no
more
recursiv
e clients: quota reached
Any ideas on how I should go about solving/fixing this?
John Horne said:
> Hello,
>
> I noticed one of the root servers stats
> ( http://stats.l.root-servers.org/cgi-bin/dsc-grapher.pl?
window=604800&plot=qtype_vs_invalid_tld&server=L-root ) of queried invalid
TLDs, as at the moment we have no 'local.' or 'lan.' zones configured.
Hence, any such qu
Lisa Casey wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm not really sure what to do about this. I'm running Bind 9 on
> FreeBSD.
What version of BIND, what version of FreeBSD?
> Suddenly this morning I began noticing the following in
> /var/log/messages:
> Aug 26 12:48:56 netlink named[295]: client 207.191.185.6#60614:
One thing the root should know - as a rule is the location of localhost.
There is after all just one address associated with it 127.0.0.1. There
should be no localhost queries to the root as a rule - but misconfigured
servers result in this traffic to the root which is listed as invalid. If
the ro
Hello,
I noticed one of the root servers stats
(
http://stats.l.root-servers.org/cgi-bin/dsc-grapher.pl?window=604800&plot=qtype_vs_invalid_tld&server=L-root
) of queried invalid TLDs, as at the moment we have no 'local.' or 'lan.'
zones configured. Hence, any such queries from us go out to the
To BIND-USERS:
I'm not sure if I got GSS-TSIG working correctly 'yet'... however it will work
if i use "allow-update { any; };"
and logs shows "28-Aug-2009 21:20:46.813 security: debug 3: client
172.17.1.2#62729: request has valid signature"
The difference...
THIS WORKS FOR ME:
tkey-
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Niall O'Reilly wrote:
> Lisa Casey wrote:
>
>> Aug 26 12:48:56 netlink named[295]: client 207.191.185.6#60614: no more
>> recursiv
>> e clients: quota reached
>
>> Any ideas on how I should go about solving/fixing this?
>
> I'ld suggest you check your connec
[...]
Then. maybe you want to exchange Fedora with Red Hat's paid and
supported offering (RHEL ?). If that Server is mission critical
for you, the few bucks of yearly support contract shouldn't be
that much of a problem.
[...]
I have had many problems with Fedora 11 on a PPC as I run it for w
10 matches
Mail list logo