At Wed, 26 Aug 2009 13:37:09 -0400,
"Lisa Casey" wrote:
> The lins recursive clients: 564/1000 bothers me, did my change to
> /etc/named.conf not get oicked up? It appears that the max recursive
> clients is still at bind's default of 1000.
True. It's also true that
recursive-clients 5000
At Tue, 25 Aug 2009 22:08:11 +0200,
clemens fischer wrote:
> > How about the patch copied below? With this it would fail like this:
> >
> > 24-Aug-2009 16:46:41.334
> > /Users/jinmei/src/isc/bind9-current/bin/named/named.conf:22: failed to
> > add dnsbl-1.uceprotect.net for deny-answer-addresse
Hi,
I'm not really sure what to do about this. I'm running Bind 9 on FreeBSD.
Suddenly this morning I began noticing the following in /var/log/messages:
Aug 26 12:48:56 netlink named[295]: client 207.191.185.6#60614: no more recursiv
e clients: quota reached
Aug 26 12:48:56 netlink named[295]: c
In message , Luis
Silva writes:
> Hi,
> Can anyone tell me the maximum size for DNS messages using TCP? I scanned
> all RFCs that I knew, but I can't find the answer. The problem is that I'm
> integrating my BIND server with a DNS name server which can only send AXFR
> answers with a 65535 maximu
Hi,
Can anyone tell me the maximum size for DNS messages using TCP? I scanned
all RFCs that I knew, but I can't find the answer. The problem is that I'm
integrating my BIND server with a DNS name server which can only send AXFR
answers with a 65535 maximum message size.
Thank you,
LS
_
Hello,
I used a separate directory to build bind 9.7.0a2:
$ mkdir build
$ cd build
$ ../configure
$ make
$ make install
and found that make install fails while installing isc-config.sh. With
the attached patch, make install succeeds. Would you consider its
inclusion, please?
Best regards,
--
6 matches
Mail list logo