Hi List,
I want to know how to upgrade from BIND 9.4.2 to latest version?
Thanks.
Blue
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
It looks like there are two mail-to-news gateways running for
bind-users, so every message to the list is being posted twice to the
newsgroup. Here's a diff between the headers of two recent dups.
*** /tmp/header1 Sat Aug 22 11:09:39 2009
--- /tmp/header2 Sat Aug 22 11:09:43 2009
On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 02:45:19PM +0200, Hauke Lampe wrote:
> Joseph S D Yao wrote:
>
> > It turned out that this latter file was needed, but for some
> > inexplicable reason perhaps having to do with library routines [I have
> > not gone chasing down the code], it ALSO wants the "mynet.private"
Joseph S D Yao wrote:
> It turned out that this latter file was needed, but for some
> inexplicable reason perhaps having to do with library routines [I have
> not gone chasing down the code], it ALSO wants the "mynet.private" file!
The nsupdate manpages mentions this behaviour in the "BUGS" sect
"Mark Andrews" schrieb:
> You do however have a delegation mismatch.
>
> 48-28.164.69.212.in-addr.arpa. 86400 IN NS dns1.zmi.at.
> 48-28.164.69.212.in-addr.arpa. 86400 IN NS dns2.zmi.at.
> ;; Received 91 bytes from 82.98.222.6#53(dns2.serico.de) in 717 ms
>
> 48-28.164.69.212.in-addr.a
On 18/08/09 20:32, Kevin Darcy wrote:
No, you can't do a "sideways" delegation like that.
The correct solution, as stated elsewhere, is to get
251.250.63.in-addr.arpa delegated directly from ARIN to the customer.
Strictly speaking it is legal to use DNAME at the apex of a zone since
DNAME onl
In message <200908220352.n7m3qfwn030...@drugs.dv.isc.org>, Mark Andrews writes:
>
> In message <65afb5970908210654s56231ce1g461a251fe9afa...@mail.gmail.com>,
> Matt
> writes:
> > Hi all,
> >
> >
> >
> > We are seeing odd behaviour when attempting to look up the following url
> > from a range
7 matches
Mail list logo
