In message <5ea10b89-4650-4f82-a41d-cb511ce2a...@tcbug.org>, Josh Paetzel write
s:
> I've googled a bit and been unable to find the solution that I need.
>
> I have a master nameserver that has 4 views configured. I have a
> slave for this that is currently using 4 IPs to slave the views. Thi
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 06:59:03PM -0700, Gregory Hicks wrote:
...
> zone "96-28.55.139.64.in-addr.arpa" {
> type master ;
> file "db.96-28.55.139.64.in-addr.arpa" ;
> allow-update { none; };
> };
>
> This is my reverse zone:
>
>
> $ORIGIN .
> $TTL 3600
>
> 96-28.55
> From: "Caveguy"
> To: "Gregory Hicks"
> Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 22:15:59 -0400
> Subject: Re: Classless CIDR delegation...
>
> On Sat, 15 Aug 2009 18:59:03 -0700 (PDT), Gregory Hicks wrote:
>
> > zone "96-28.55.139.64.in-addr.arpa" {
> ...
> >file "db.96-28.55.139.64.in-addr.arpa" ;
>
> Try:
Gregory Hicks wrote:
> Greetings:
>
> I'm having a bit of a problem with my DNS server. Serves my forward
> zone OK but fails to load the DATA for the PTR (reverse) zone.
> Something about "ignoring out of zone data"... I understand that my
> reverse zone actually has NOT been delegated to my s
Greetings:
I'm having a bit of a problem with my DNS server. Serves my forward
zone OK but fails to load the DATA for the PTR (reverse) zone.
Something about "ignoring out of zone data"... I understand that my
reverse zone actually has NOT been delegated to my servers. (That was
done with malic
I've recently moved our DNS from FreeBSD 4 / Bind8 to CentOS 5.3
Bind9.4.3. These are not authoritative for any routable domains but
are for my NAT'd school network. I have an AD server (10.1.60.11) that
forwards to my two Bind servers. I receive the logwatch each night and
have some questi
I've googled a bit and been unable to find the solution that I need.
I have a master nameserver that has 4 views configured. I have a
slave for this that is currently using 4 IPs to slave the views. This
works fairly well, except that the slave server is unable to handle
NOTIFY from the m
On Fri, 14 Aug 2009, Evan Hunt wrote:
The truth is that E is a hard limit, so the range you get is E-J to E.
So, given E = S + 30d, and J = 30d, you're getting expiry times ranging
from S to E.
S, in this case, is an hour in the past. I guess that accounts for the
already-expired signatures y
8 matches
Mail list logo
