In message , Chris Hills writes:
> Here I get a bad referral:
>
> 25.70.in-addr.arpa. 86400 IN NS TOROON63NSZP05.SRVR.BELL.CA.
> 25.70.in-addr.arpa. 86400 IN NS TOROONDCNSZS05.SRVR.BELL.CA.
> ;; Received 113 bytes from 192.35.51.32#53(dill.arin.net) in 173 ms
>
>
Here I get a bad referral:
25.70.in-addr.arpa. 86400 IN NS TOROON63NSZP05.SRVR.BELL.CA.
25.70.in-addr.arpa. 86400 IN NS TOROONDCNSZS05.SRVR.BELL.CA.
;; Received 113 bytes from 192.35.51.32#53(dill.arin.net) in 173 ms
. 360 IN NS
Hello, all.
I have four offices and set different 4 views at named.conf.
When I see zone transfer, only some zones are zone-transfered but othere not at
slave.
Some say, notify-source statement is required and must be multi-homed to solve
this problem.
then I should set 4 alias ip address
Is there a solution to this? Or only correct external domain?
This happen with your bind server?
Thanks.
Breno.
Kevin Darcy escreveu:
Yes, ns1.geap.com.br and ns2.geap.com.br are both CNAMEs. Pointing NS
records at CNAMEs is not only illegal, but causes real problems, as
you can see.
On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 05:00:59PM -0400, Alexandre Racine wrote:
> @Justin, you mean like a 3rd DNS server? I was thinking about that
> since one recent RFC recommend that 3 DNS servers within 3 networks
> should be present (primary, secondary, and third).
Not for the same reason as having 2 or 3
You have to configure your named.conf on servers
ns{11,12}.bgrinformatique.com with
zone "80-28.115.25.70.in-addr.arpa" IN {
type master;
file "master/db.80-28.115.25.70.in-addr.arpa";
};
An your zone file master/db.80-28.115.25.70.in-addr.arpa
with:
80-28.115.25.70.in-addr
@Kevin, Wow, that's a pretty impressive good and complete answer.
I'll really check this out on Monday and give some feedback.
@Jeff, Sorry, the complete answer was "Asking ns10.bgrinformatique.com. for
82.80-28.115.25.70.in-addr.arpa. PTR record: Reports that no PTR records exist
[from 70.25
On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 04:06:23PM -0400, Kevin Darcy wrote:
> For good measure, you should probably also set yourself up to slave
> 25.70.in-addr.arpa from Bell Canada so that you can still resolve your
> own PTRs even if your link is down.
And (per rfc) ask if Bell will slave your delegated z
On Thu, 6 Aug 2009 13:03:58 -0700
Daniel Ballenger wrote:
> I could be blind, but I don't see the PTR record for that IP in the
> zone file you pasted.
Isn't this it?
> On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 12:52 PM, Alexandre
> Racine wrote:
>> [...]
>> 82.115.25.70.in-addr.arpa. IN PTR mail.bgrinformatiqu
The in-addr.arpa zone does not appear to be delegated to you. You'll
either need to get that done, or have Bell Canada do it.
dig +trace 80.115.25.70.in-addr.arpa
; <<>> DiG 9.4.3 <<>> +trace 80.115.25.70.in-addr.arpa
;; global options: printcmd
. 513811 IN NS i.
What you have would only work if you had the whole 70.25.115.0/24 and
Bell Canada delegated all of 115.25.70.in-addr.arpa to you.
But, it looks like you only have a /28 and Bell Canada is following some
sort of RFC 2317 convention:
;; ANSWER SECTION:
82.115.25.70.in-addr.arpa. 86400 IN CNAME
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 12:52 PM, Alexandre
Racine wrote:
> “No PTR records exist for 70.25.115.82. [Neg TTL=38400 seconds]”
I could be blind, but I don't see the PTR record for that IP in the
zone file you pasted.
> 38400 )
>
> 115.25.70.in-addr.arpa.
Hi all, I am trying to make my PTR work and it does not. Testing it with
dnsstuff and other tools simply say that there are no records
"No PTR records exist for 70.25.115.82. [Neg TTL=38400 seconds]"
Looking up my config, I have this below. Is there something wrong?
My other zones are working c
Yes, ns1.geap.com.br and ns2.geap.com.br are both CNAMEs. Pointing NS
records at CNAMEs is not only illegal, but causes real problems, as you
can see.
- Kevin
Breno Silveira Soare
Hi list,
I'm using bind 9.6.1.
I have problem with resolving an external name www.geap.com.br.
The first time quering the server, it's work. But when the TTL of www
record expires, the server returns SERVFAIL.
And when I execute "rndc flush" it's work as the first time.
The dump cache of my se
You want to keep the costs low but are using a paid OS (Windows) over a
free one (CentOS/Linux)?
If the PC runs Windows chances are it will run CentOS or some other
Linux distro. There is no cost as you simply reload the system with the
new OS.
BIND is ported to Windows if you must go that
16 matches
Mail list logo
