RE: [SPAM] Win2k and bind

Considering 2003, 2003 R2, 2008, and 2008 R2 (technically done, but will officially release in October) have been released, I don't think dropping support for an ancient operating system from 9.5 years ago and roughly 3 prior generations that the vendor doesn't even support is a bad idea. :) 2k

Re: Dig shows wrong ip

Chris Thompson wrote: > On Jul 28 2009, sth...@nethelp.no wrote: > >> % dig +short a dns3.potomacnetworks.com @a.gtld-servers.net >> 216.250.243.230 >> >> As long as that host record exists, with an IP different from what >> your authoritative servers reply with, you are going to have problems, >>

Re: [SPAM] Win2k and bind

Unfortunately W2K was dropped a while ago, no safe version available for it. > I know this is a very lame question, But I have been out of the Bind loop > for a number of years ( yes I went over to the dark side ...MS DNS) but I > want to come back. My question is this I have win2K servers what

[SPAM] Win2k and bind

I know this is a very lame question, But I have been out of the Bind loop for a number of years ( yes I went over to the dark side ...MS DNS) but I want to come back. My question is this I have win2K servers what version of bind will run on this? Thanks Greg This message has been checked by the

Re: Creating a CNAME to another domain.

Danny Mayer wrote: Kevin Darcy wrote: Ezra Taylor wrote: Hello All: How can I create a CNAME that points to another domain. Example below. Is the below example possible? stars.mydomain.com INCNAME stars.otherdomain.com

Re: Is my slave DNS working right?

The +trace option *forces* dig to step through each level of the hierarchy. Therefore it's not a good way of testing any kind of "override" of the normal iterative-resolution process.

Correction to signatures on yesterday's BIND 9 releases

Due to a combination of circumstances, including extreme rush and the usual signer of our releases being away at IETF, we accidentally signed yesterday's BIND 9 patch releases (9.4.3-P3, 9.5.1-P3, and 9.6.1-P1) with the expired 2006 ISC signing key rather than the current one, and didn't notice th

Is my slave DNS working right?

Hello list, Here's my scenario: I have multiple DNS servers (one master and a few slaves) authoritative for a few zones (eg mydomain.com, zone1.mydomain.com etc). I also have a caching server (a stock Redhat caching-nameserver.rpm configuration, BIND 9.2.4 ) which is used by clients on LAN to query

Re: query (cache) denied (revisited)

> > In message <8401907190740j6e04pc23316827fe0b...@mail.gmail.com>, > > Bradle > > y Caricofe writes: > [...] > > > 19-Jul-2009 10:34:29.635 client 84.235.6.53#1276: query (cache) ' > > > 6q6vszqgm.w8n08fo0.taha.com/A/IN' denied > [...] On 29.07.09 17:12, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: >

Re: 9.5.1-P1 to 9.6.1-P1

On Wed, 29 Jul 2009, Sandy Mackenzie wrote: > Any known gotcha's for this upgrade? The significant 9.6.0 changes are listed at https://www.isc.org/software/bind/new-features/9.6 The BIND 9.6.1 minor release has numerous improvements especially in portability, documentation, and DNSSEC. The rele

Re: query (cache) denied (revisited)

> In message <8401907190740j6e04pc23316827fe0b...@mail.gmail.com>, > Bradle > y Caricofe writes: [...] > > 19-Jul-2009 10:34:29.635 client 84.235.6.53#1276: query (cache) ' > > 6q6vszqgm.w8n08fo0.taha.com/A/IN' denied [...] > > There are a total of 26000 ip's hitting us daily and causing t

9.5.1-P1 to 9.6.1-P1

Any known gotcha's for this upgrade? -- Sandy Mackenzie The contents of this e-mail message and all attachments are intended for the confidential use of the addressee and where addressed to our client are the subject of solicitor and client privilege. Any retention, review, reproduction, d

Re: SRV Record Priority set by IP Address

On 20.07.09 13:26, Lev Vanyan wrote: > i've stumbled into a question whether it is possible to configure BIND > in a way that it responds to DNS SRV requests with the priority flag > changed depending on the IP address of the requesting party. > For example, > there are two SRV records for _foobar.

Re: about tcp port 53

Hello, Doing a search on this at www.google.com offers this first link: http://www.tcpipguide.com/free/t_DNSMessageGenerationandTransport-2.htm HTH - Original Message From: Tech W. To: Stephane Bortzmeyer Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2009 12:35:31 AM Subj

AW: Creating a CNAME to another domain.

wait, wait, thats not true (or at least, I find your post rather confusing) a DNAME maps whole domains, not just single records. you can map mydomain.com to otherdomain.com. this would act like, say dumping the otherdomain zonefile into the mydomain file. if you want to make a cname for mydomai

Re: about tcp port 53

On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 12:35 +0800, Tech W. wrote: > --- On Tue, 28/7/09, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > > > what's the use of bind's tcp port 53? > > DNS requests and responses. > oh, I was always thinking dns requests and responses are going with udp > protocal. under what condition it uses tcp pr