Re: How See what is Cached?

Agarwal Vivek-RNGB36 wrote: Hi All Iam trying to run the same command on Red Hat Linux; but its not giving any output. How can I check the cache in the redhat linux Regards Vivek Aggarwal +973-36583058 It would help if you said which version of Bind you were using. smime.p7s Descript

RE: How See what is Cached?

Hi All Iam trying to run the same command on Red Hat Linux; but its not giving any output. How can I check the cache in the redhat linux Regards Vivek Aggarwal +973-36583058  -Original Message- From: bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org [mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf

Re: Odd PTR through cisco NAT behaviour.

Agreed. I suspect over-exuberance on the part of the network security team with either the router or the PIX config. This is a only-recent problem and I am just going to hand it back to them. ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://l

Re: Odd PTR through cisco NAT behaviour.

In message <4bde94f10907132058j73504abdr790dcab27898c...@mail.gmail.com>, Hokum ae writes: > Thanks for the quick response Mark. > > I've already tried the 10. reverse zone in the "external" view option, > and no joy (not sure why). > > I will just have to think about the Cisco config. There is

Re: Odd PTR through cisco NAT behaviour.

Thanks for the quick response Mark. I've already tried the 10. reverse zone in the "external" view option, and no joy (not sure why). I will just have to think about the Cisco config. There is a mirrored round-robin server ring behind the router answering first-come-first-serve for several servi

Re: Odd PTR through cisco NAT behaviour.

In message <4bde94f10907131945n2f22dfe6j502111e545d2a...@mail.gmail.com>, Hokum ae writes: > I host a portable class C subnet (A portable /24): 192.75.X.X > I run an instance of BIND 9.4.3_p2 on a NAT'd machine > (2.6.29-gentoo-r5): 10.10.10.10 > The NAT is handled by a Cisco 1760 > > BIND is con

Odd PTR through cisco NAT behaviour.

I host a portable class C subnet (A portable /24): 192.75.X.X I run an instance of BIND 9.4.3_p2 on a NAT'd machine (2.6.29-gentoo-r5): 10.10.10.10 The NAT is handled by a Cisco 1760 BIND is configured in a "Split View" INTERNAL/EXTERNAL configuration. The problem -- PTR requests for the 2 MX ser

Re: DNSKEY Validation

In message <4a5b1bdc.3090...@gis.net>, Danny Mayer writes: > Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 08:42:27PM +0200, > > Mark Elkins wrote > > a message of 31 lines which said: > > > >> Arg 3 should be 5 (or maybe 3) - the algorithm. > > > > No, you must bnot use a h

Re: Truncated, retrying in TCP on Reverse lookup

> On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 05:50:02AM -0700, > Fr34k wrote > a message of 119 lines which said: > > > There should be one and only one PTR for that IP. On 10.07.09 22:40, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > No. No good reason for such restriction. While from DNS' point of view there is no reason to

Re: DNSKEY Validation

Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 08:42:27PM +0200, > Mark Elkins wrote > a message of 31 lines which said: > >> Arg 3 should be 5 (or maybe 3) - the algorithm. > > No, you must bnot use a hard-wired list in your code, because the list > of algorithmps registered at