Scott Haneda wrote:
Maybe cheat with round robin? Add 3 copies of one record and 1 of the
other. That should give you 75/25 roughly.
BIND won't let you do that, it'll throw away the duplicates when it
loads the zone.
You need some other piece of software or hardware that can do that
(insert ve
In message , Chris Adams write
s:
> Since I read that the root is supposed to be signed by the end of the
> year, I am just trying to understand DNSSEC support and the various
> versions of BIND a little better here, so please don't throw too many
> rocks if I ask something stupid...
>
> I run th
Scott Haneda wrote:
> Maybe cheat with round robin? Add 3 copies of one record and 1 of the
> other. That should give you 75/25 roughly.
BIND won't let you do that, it'll throw away the duplicates when it
loads the zone.
You need some other piece of software or hardware that can do that
(insert v
Since I read that the root is supposed to be signed by the end of the
year, I am just trying to understand DNSSEC support and the various
versions of BIND a little better here, so please don't throw too many
rocks if I ask something stupid...
I run the nameservers for an ISP. For the recursive se
Maybe cheat with round robin? Add 3 copies of one record and 1 of the
other. That should give you 75/25 roughly.
I don't think it's a dead on exact thing bit it may be close enough
for your needs.
--
Scott
Iphone says hello.
On Jun 4, 2009, at 7:09 PM, "Tech W." wrote:
Hi,
Is it possibl
Hi,
Is it possible to set weight for records?
for example,I have these two A records:
wwwIN A 192.168.1.100
IN A 192.168.1.101
But I want 192.168.1.100 take the weight of 75%, and 192.168.1.101 take the
weight of 25%. That means, when clients query for www.domain.com, 1.100 h
On Fri, 29 May 2009, Jesse Cabral wrote:
> When I rerun ./configure --disable-threads the configure file does not
> update.
I guess you mean the config.h doesn't update. But probably the
./lib/isc/include/isc/platform.h file did change (so
ISC_PLATFORM_USETHREADS is no longer defined). (In my c
On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 12:42:28AM +0200,
Christoph Weber-Fahr wrote
a message of 29 lines which said:
> Does it even compile with current bind versions?
Yes and it is even now officially included in BIND (starting from 9.4,
I believe), no need to patch.
__
Hi
On this server we upgraded from 9.4.3b3 to 9.5.1P1
Response time went from 3 ms to 900 ms
What makes this server different is that it runs a wedge that checks for
nxdomain
Is there a security enhancement or something new that this version of
bind deals differently with all querie
Just to add to the excellent comments already posted here, using +trace can
be helpful in seeing how things are delegated. I use the paid version of
DNSreports to provide a non-tech friendly version of the delegation, which
has the added benefit of beings able to trace it down other "branches" as
Shane Wegner wrote:
Hello,
I am looking at setting up tkey between master and slave
nameservers but have been unable to find documentation on
how to get this going properly. In the bind9 manual, there
is a whole section on TSIG and setting up shared secrets
between servers but how does one do it
11 matches
Mail list logo
