Scott,
The refresh timer is not the correct target. The refresh timer governs
replication between master and slave in the absence of notifications.
Instead, target the $TTL line at the top of each zone. This provides
the default TTL of each record in the absence of any explicit TTL (or
"i
On Sun, 2009-05-03 at 10:12, Scott Haneda wrote:
> On May 2, 2009, at 4:25 PM, Noel Butler wrote:
> >> Any suggestions
> >
> > perl substitutions would be your friend, had to do this myself a
> > few years back, but the key is do fresh backup /var/named first,
> > then try: perl -pi -e
On May 2, 2009, at 4:25 PM, Noel Butler wrote:
On Sun, 2009-05-03 at 08:39, Scott Haneda wrote:
I client of mine has thousands of DNS zones that will need a ttl
chance and a serial bump. I want to set a relevant ttl to 300 for a
few days.
After that, an IP address change will be made, and I
Scott,
On Sun, 2009-05-03 at 08:39, Scott Haneda wrote:
> I client of mine has thousands of DNS zones that will need a ttl
> chance and a serial bump. I want to set a relevant ttl to 300 for a
> few days.
>
> After that, an IP address change will be made, and I would like to
> change the
I client of mine has thousands of DNS zones that will need a ttl
chance and a serial bump. I want to set a relevant ttl to 300 for a
few days.
After that, an IP address change will be made, and I would like to
change the TTL back to something sane. The general format of the zone
looks s
This is a bug in the kernel where it does not honour that
the socket is set to non-blocking mode but instead blocks.
Go complain to your OS vendor.
Mark
In message <38a4524a0905020806s4c939382n80c1c3da656c8...@mail.gmail.com>,
Nelson Vale writes:
> Hi all,
>
>
On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 9:39 PM, Jonathan Petersson wrote:
> Could you please provide a copy of your config, I'm guessing that you
> have a general forwarder in place or haven't turned on recursion.
The options and the forward zone are as follows:
acl internal {
127.0.0.1/8;
192.168.9.0/2
Could you please provide a copy of your config, I'm guessing that you
have a general forwarder in place or haven't turned on recursion.
/Jonathan
On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 8:06 AM, Nelson Vale wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
> I've been facing a problem in my private network which I was not able to fix
> yet.
In article ,
Nelson Vale wrote:
> I've been facing a problem in my private network which I was not able to fix
> yet.
>
> In my gateway (linux debian alike) I have bind 9.5 installed and running,
> and I have one IPSec tunnel to another gateway over the internet. It also
> has configured a forw
Hi all,
I've been facing a problem in my private network which I was not able to fix
yet.
In my gateway (linux debian alike) I have bind 9.5 installed and running,
and I have one IPSec tunnel to another gateway over the internet. It also
has configured a forward zone with the name server being t
10 matches
Mail list logo
