On Apr 29, 2009, at 5:03 PM, Barry Margolin wrote:
In article ,
Scott Haneda wrote:
like my machine, .14 is refusing their refresh request. Do I need to
allow-recursion for their NS0?
No, you shouldn't need allow-recursion. You might need allow-query,
if
you're not allowing to all.
For those who's interested in the end-result I decided to post my code
on my blog.
http://garnser.blogspot.com/2009/04/dns-query-parser.html
The code creates a FIFO that BIND query-log writes to. Once the script
receives data it's parsed cached and written to a database.
I'll continue to make ad
At Tue, 28 Apr 2009 00:42:29 -0700,
"Jeff Pang" wrote:
> When a Bind requests another Bind for a name resolving, what's the
> timeout value for this resuest?
> I mean, within how many seconds peer Bind doesn't answer it, this Bind
> will give up the query?
There are various types of "timeouts".
In article ,
Scott Haneda wrote:
> I have been having some long standing issues with my secondary
> provider that I would like to learn how to solve, and who needs to
> look to solve the errors. When I make an update, it seems hit or miss
> as to how long before I see it hit the secondary
I have been having some long standing issues with my secondary
provider that I would like to learn how to solve, and who needs to
look to solve the errors. When I make an update, it seems hit or miss
as to how long before I see it hit the secondary.
Apparently they have a server at xx.xx.
I finally understand how to use spcl files, so I now know that I can have
several. I was thrown by the existence of the spcl statement in the current
h2n config when in fact it was not required.
Therefore, it would appear that using spcl files is the easiest way to add
the NS statements, but I wou
We currently use h2n in a simple configuration. There are redundant DNS
servers that I have not shown here:
-M -y -I ignore -q
-d bart.gov spcl=spcl.bart mode=D
-n 148.165/16 -n
-h Athena
-T RR="IN A 98.129.93.250"
-T RR="
Greetings,
I ran into an interesting issue with the "allow-update-forwarding" statement
on BIND 9.4.2-P1 which I haven't seen addressed in the BIND books I’ve
looked at or the websites I've come across. Here's what I'm seeing:
If a dynamic update is received by the slave and "allow-update-forwardi
Thanks for the tip, however the main problem that I'm seeing is that
perl + MySQL becomes a bottle-neck if this approach were to be used. I
ran some tests yesterday showing that caching 500k rows in a variable
and send it to MySQL was 10 times as effective (90k vs 9k) than doing
individual writes.
Hi,
You can forwrd your logs to other machine ( e.g. specially for logs ) and
there you can parse through log file.
It's good solution if you have more than one server.
Best regards,
Sebastian Tymków
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.or
You may be interested in using circular buffers, instead of a log file.
http://www.finalcog.com/replace-logs-emlog-circular-buffer
I've used emlog successfully in the past and been very pleased with
it's performance.
Hope this is useful.
Chris.
2009/4/29 Scott Haneda :
> I have read the other
11 matches
Mail list logo
