In article , grarpamp
wrote:
> Given:
> A research or production network that only supports TCP. Think:
> I2P, Tor, GNUnet, FreeNet, etc.
> Corporate/organizational policies/firewalls, etc.
> Other seemingly odd, broken or interesting special case environments,
>easier tunneling/encap
Barry Margolin wrote:
> > 3. Incorrect behaviour by the resolver behind 95.102.17.107.
>
> Could it be the built-in resolver in spamming software?
That's plausible, especially in relation to MX records.
--
Ronan Flood
___
bind-users mailing list
bi
Given:
A research or production network that only supports TCP. Think:
I2P, Tor, GNUnet, FreeNet, etc.
Corporate/organizational policies/firewalls, etc.
Other seemingly odd, broken or interesting special case environments,
easier tunneling/encapsulation and so on.
Supposing:
Named(8) se
3 matches
Mail list logo