[Inline Scripts Disarmed] Re: [Inline Scripts Disarmed] RE: subnets combining

2009-03-15 Thread Noel Butler
Ed (I didn't see your post to the list?), I tend to agree with Ben, I looked into this a few years ago and couldn't see a way, decided it was less time to write a perl script to automate it all than to keep experimenting. It creates the PTR zone, adds to named.conf and adds the corresponding A re

RE: subnets combining

2009-03-15 Thread Ben Bridges
It sounds like you are looking for some configuration shorthand for BIND that will allow you to configure it to be authoritative for the 16 /24's comprising the /20 without having to explicitly configure 16 zones on BIND. I think you're out of luck - BIND needs to have a zone statement for each

RE: PTR zone / VLSM issue

2009-03-15 Thread Ben Bridges
I agree, it's arbitrary. If you are wanting to format the name of your zone similarly to the RFC, I believe the format would be 96/27.51.212.195.in-addr.arpa (for the subnet 195.212.51.96/27). From: bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org on behalf of Alan Clegg Sen

Re: PTR zone / VLSM issue

2009-03-15 Thread Alan Clegg
Charles Lee wrote: > I believe its format should be: 96-127.51.212.195.in-addr.arpa > > The problem I seem to be having is what order the 96-127 should be in, > because in normal format the network is 195.212.51.96-127 (we basically > run address .96 to address .127) > > Can anyone help out wit

Re: [dnssec] issue resolving unsigned child zone using DLV

2009-03-15 Thread Florian Weimer
* Shane W.: >> There should be a signed NSEC record showing that the delegation is, >> indeed, unsigned. > > Well we're using nsec3 if that matters but if it's not > being signed correctly, is that likely a bug with how we're > calling dnssec-signzone? Ah, in that case, you probably haven't upgra

PTR zone / VLSM issue

2009-03-15 Thread Charles Lee
Greetings- I need to run a PTR zone for a network smaller than 24 bit. I believe its format should be: 96-127.51.212.195.in-addr.arpa The problem I seem to be having is what order the 96-127 should be in, because in normal format the network is 195.212.51.96-127 (we basically run address .96

Re: GeoIP like RBLDNS

2009-03-15 Thread Larry Brower
What about using bind-dlz and use a mysql database for the records? Michelle Konzack wrote: >Hello Bind9 Geeks/Nerds and whoever, > >I have the need for a GeoIP Database but the one from Maxmind peoduce a >Disk-IO as the hell. Now my Idea is to use my bind9 to archive my goal. > >In general, I

GeoIP like RBLDNS

2009-03-15 Thread Michelle Konzack
Hello Bind9 Geeks/Nerds and whoever, I have the need for a GeoIP Database but the one from Maxmind peoduce a Disk-IO as the hell. Now my Idea is to use my bind9 to archive my goal. In general, I need ONLY the contry code for a given IP but I a not disinclined to put more infos in the data

Re: [dnssec] issue resolving unsigned child zone using DLV

2009-03-15 Thread Florian Weimer
* Shane W.: > Bind outputs: > Mar 14 12:39:13 continuum named[2168]: no valid RRSIG resolving > 'odyssey.csy.ca/NS/IN': 72.55.146.170#53 > Mar 14 12:39:13 continuum named[2168]: no valid RRSIG resolving > 'odyssey.csy.ca/NS/IN': 96.49.174.96#53 > Mar 14 12:39:13 continuum named[2168]: no valid R