Kevin Darcy wrote:
> But, as far as I can tell, there's no *practical* reason to disallow
> underscores, other than the fact that it may trip the standards-checking
> code of some _other_ piece of software. So, piece of software A
> disallows underscores because it's worried about causing a proble
Stephen Ward wrote:
Just a quick silly question.
Running BIND9 (someone kindly raped to get it to work on windows) but it
does not seem to support CIDR ranges. I mostly use it to block unwanted
email by connecting IP (glorified reverse DNS).
Rather than have to enter loads of lines to match
There are other DNS servers that do a better job for RBLs.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org
[mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Stephen Ward
Sent: Sunday, March 08, 2009 5:20 AM
To: comp-protocols-dns-b...@isc.org
Subject: Zonefiles & CIDR
In article ,
Stephen Ward wrote:
> Just a quick silly question.
>
> Running BIND9 (someone kindly raped to get it to work on windows) but it
> does not seem to support CIDR ranges. I mostly use it to block unwanted
> email by connecting IP (glorified reverse DNS).
>
> Rather than have to ent
One thing I should add is that chasing down lack of BCP38 compliance
isn't "wack-a-mole" though it may feel like it. This is a configuration
change and as such tends to be premanent especially once it get written
into the procedures documents.
Mark
--
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Val
On Sun, 8 Mar 2009, enigmedia wrote:
Hi All: my 9.6.0 server is getting hammered by cache requests from a
specific IP (62.109.4.89) which traces back to what looks like a DSL
netblock in Russia:
05-Mar-2009 12:18:01.883 queries: info: client 62.109.4.89#53157: query: .
IN NS +
05-Mar-2009 12:18
> > Hi All: my 9.6.0 server is getting hammered by cache requests from a
> > specific IP (62.109.4.89) which traces back to what looks like a DSL
> > netblock in Russia:
> >
> > 05-Mar-2009 12:18:01.883 queries: info: client 62.109.4.89#53157: query: .
> > IN NS +
> > 05-Mar-2009 12:18:01.883 s
Just a quick silly question.
Running BIND9 (someone kindly raped to get it to work on windows) but it
does not seem to support CIDR ranges. I mostly use it to block unwanted
email by connecting IP (glorified reverse DNS).
Rather than have to enter loads of lines to match up wide spans of ranges
On Sat, 07 Mar 2009 22:03:14 -0500, R Dicaire faxed us with
> On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 8:44 PM, Bill Landry wrote:
>> I have to admit that I am a bit baffled by this one. =A0I can query
>> against my bandwidth providers name servers (Comcast) and get name
>> resolution just fine for the hostnam
9 matches
Mail list logo
