RE: Case For Microsoft DNS v. BIND 9 - Or Best Practices ForCoexisting

2009-02-08 Thread Vinny Abello
> -Original Message- > From: Danny Mayer [mailto:ma...@gis.net] > Sent: Sunday, February 08, 2009 9:57 PM > To: Vinny Abello > Cc: Baird, Josh; bind-users@lists.isc.org > Subject: Re: Case For Microsoft DNS v. BIND 9 - Or Best Practices > ForCoexisting > > Vinny Abello wrote: > >> -Ori

Re: Case For Microsoft DNS v. BIND 9 - Or Best Practices ForCoexisting

2009-02-08 Thread Danny Mayer
Vinny Abello wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: Danny Mayer [mailto:ma...@gis.net] >> Sent: Sunday, February 08, 2009 8:32 PM >> To: Vinny Abello >> Cc: Baird, Josh; bind-users@lists.isc.org >> Subject: Re: Case For Microsoft DNS v. BIND 9 - Or Best Practices >> ForCoexisting >> >> Vinny

RE: Case For Microsoft DNS v. BIND 9 - Or Best Practices ForCoexisting

2009-02-08 Thread Vinny Abello
> -Original Message- > From: Danny Mayer [mailto:ma...@gis.net] > Sent: Sunday, February 08, 2009 8:32 PM > To: Vinny Abello > Cc: Baird, Josh; bind-users@lists.isc.org > Subject: Re: Case For Microsoft DNS v. BIND 9 - Or Best Practices > ForCoexisting > > Vinny Abello wrote: > >> Baird, J

Re: Case For Microsoft DNS v. BIND 9 - Or Best Practices ForCoexisting

2009-02-08 Thread Danny Mayer
Vinny Abello wrote: >> Baird, Josh wrote: >>> Actually, yes, if you have dynamic DNS registration enabled on the >> client/host and server, an 'A' record will automatically be created in >> the AD zone. >> It needs to be registered in the domain first. Otherwise any system >> could mascarade as ano

Re: bind9 internal/external + dhcp clients - wins

2009-02-08 Thread Sten Carlsen
Certainly doable. I have had this running for some years now. I also have mail.myself.dk resolving to an internal address if I am on my internal network and to an external address if I am outside my network. I use bind with two views and dhcpd for internal addresses updating one view. Setup was a

Re: Case For Microsoft DNS v. BIND 9 - Or Best Practices For Coexisting

2009-02-08 Thread Mark Andrews
> One example in closing for ya, go try and get an RFC complient Bind server > to respond to a request for name resoloution on a host that has an _ > (underscore) in the name, MS allows this, and a zone transfer of this kinda > stuff between and MS Server and a Bind server, can give you MUCH g

Re: possible noob question - @ CNAME?

2009-02-08 Thread Mark Andrews
In message , RJValenta writes: > forever ago, i set myself up with a solid bandwidth and static IPs and > started to host websites for my friends & their small businesses. > basically, they covered the cost of my internet access. > > so for 10 years i've been hosting my own name, mail, and web s

Re: possible noob question - @ CNAME?

2009-02-08 Thread Ben Croswell
You can not have a CNAME at the "domain" level. It is against RFC to have a CNAME and any other data at the same level of a given domain tree. i.e. the following is illegal wwwin CNAME www.blah.com wwwin MX 10 mail.blah.com This will cause BIND to throw the zone and not load it because it

Re: manually generating tsig keys

2009-02-08 Thread Mark Andrews
In message <20090206194146.ga24...@norchemlab.com>, Justin T Pryzby writes: > ARM9.5 still mentions manual generation of TSIG data: > https://www.isc.org/software/bind/documentation/arm95#tsig > > Is there any advtantage to using -keygen ? It really depends on how you are going to use t

Re: Case For Microsoft DNS v. BIND 9 - Or Best Practices For Coexisting

2009-02-08 Thread steve
Microsoft DNS can work well, HOWEVER much time needs to be spent understanding its operations. This is a VERY long winded post, so I hope no one gets upset, I realize this is not the MS DNS group LOL I am going to assume, that you are running an Active Directory Domain that includes thes

RE: Case For Microsoft DNS v. BIND 9 - Or Best Practices For Coexisting

2009-02-08 Thread Vinny Abello
> -Original Message- > From: bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org [mailto:bind-users- > boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Danny Mayer > Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2009 2:29 PM > To: wiskbr...@hotmail.com > Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org > Subject: Re: Case For Microsoft DNS v. BIND 9 - Or Bes

manually generating tsig keys

2009-02-08 Thread Justin T Pryzby
ARM9.5 still mentions manual generation of TSIG data: https://www.isc.org/software/bind/documentation/arm95#tsig Is there any advtantage to using -keygen ? ISTR some mention of an algorithm used to minimize the possibility of collisions. Or is that true for any key used with HMAC? Justin __

RE: Case For Microsoft DNS v. BIND 9 - Or Best Practices ForCoexisting

2009-02-08 Thread Vinny Abello
> Baird, Josh wrote: > > Actually, yes, if you have dynamic DNS registration enabled on the > client/host and server, an 'A' record will automatically be created in > the AD zone. > > > > It needs to be registered in the domain first. Otherwise any system > could mascarade as another system. > >

bind9 internal/external + dhcp clients - wins

2009-02-08 Thread JeffH
Sorry if this is drifting a little from the group topic – if you know of a better place to post this question, please let me know. I’m trying to configure a small DHCP internal network, connected to a router connected to the internet. I want it so that internally, all DHCP systems are able to reso

possible noob question - @ CNAME?

2009-02-08 Thread RJValenta
forever ago, i set myself up with a solid bandwidth and static IPs and started to host websites for my friends & their small businesses. basically, they covered the cost of my internet access. so for 10 years i've been hosting my own name, mail, and web servers allowing me to '@ A xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx'