Lalvani, Hiro wrote:
> Could any one of help me, regarding this fix in BIND 9.2. I am unable to find
> function same function in BIND 9.2 or could any one just share the
> corresponding related the code architecture between BIND9.2 and BIND 9.3.
http://oldwww.isc.org/sw/bind/view/?release=9.2.9
This is slightly OT, I am not able to resolve some domains from a server
hosted at thePlanet (Centos-5.2 with bind 9.3.3 )
-
[r...@smtpout1 ~]# dig @localhost bsnl.in
; <<>> DiG 9.3.3rc2 <<>> @localhost bsnl.in
; (1 server found)
;; global optio
Lalvani, Hiro wrote:
> Hi ,
>
> I need small help regarding this issue.
>
> I have looked at the file " openssldsa_link.c " under the BIND-9.3 and found
> below code snapshot where the problem occured.
>
>
> status = DSA_do_verify(digest, ISC_SHA1_DIGESTLENGTH, dsasig, dsa);
> DSA_SIG
Thilanka Samarasekera wrote:
> Can someone tell me how a BIND 9 server selects what forwarder its going
> to use? I read that BIND 8 used roundtrip time through a ping but I
> cannot find how BIND 9 does that. Does it round-robin between the
> forwarders that are set? Thanks in advance.
>
> T
You
> Is this intermittent SERVFAIL issue resolved in 9.5.1-P1?
9.5.1 has many improvements that solve various SERVFAIL issues seen in the
9.5.0-P1/P2 code and includes /dev/poll, kqueue, or epoll on supported
systems.
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-user
http://marc.info/?l=bind-users&m=122239920822324&w=2
http://marc.info/?l=bind-users&m=122243068905656&w=2
We upgraded to 9.5.0-P1 when the Kaminsky DNS vulnerability was announced
and have had intermittent issues with SERVFAIL problems for some DSL modems
that don't properly fail over to a seconda
At Thu, 15 Jan 2009 15:57:17 -0600,
Rich Goodson wrote:
> I had the same issue on one of my caching resolvers just yesterday for
> the first time. This is one of the lowest utilized servers out of 6
> that are all on identical hardware and identical versions of BIND
> (9.4.3).
>
> Jan 14
Hi ozgurs,
can you give me your address so I can settup a zone for you?
e.g.
ozgurs A 127.0.0.1
Then you have the proof that it is working.
Please have a look at
http://www.cesidianroot.net/
to find how to settup your DNS for the test.
If you have a dynamic ip address things are a li
I had the same issue on one of my caching resolvers just yesterday for
the first time. This is one of the lowest utilized servers out of 6
that are all on identical hardware and identical versions of BIND
(9.4.3).
Jan 14 17:46:38 wdmdc-dns-dts2 named[1415]: [ID 873579 daemon.crit]
name.c
At Thu, 15 Jan 2009 11:52:37 -0600,
"Thilanka Samarasekera" wrote:
> Can someone tell me how a BIND 9 server selects what forwarder its going to
> use? I read that BIND 8 used roundtrip time through a ping but I cannot find
> how BIND 9 does that. Does it round-robin between the forwarders that a
Hi ,
I need small help regarding this issue.
I have looked at the file " openssldsa_link.c " under the BIND-9.3 and found
below code snapshot where the problem occured.
status = DSA_do_verify(digest, ISC_SHA1_DIGESTLENGTH, dsasig, dsa);
DSA_SIG_free(dsasig);
if (status == 0)
Hi ,
I need small help regarding this issue.
I have looked at the file " openssldsa_link.c " under the BIND-9.3 and found
below code snapshot where the problem occured.
status = DSA_do_verify(digest, ISC_SHA1_DIGESTLENGTH, dsasig, dsa);
DSA_SIG_free(dsasig);
if (status == 0)
On Jan 15, 2009, at 6:33 AM, Halassy Zoltán wrote:
My configuration:
Have a router, two computers behind it. comp1 has webserver (no
mailserver), comp2 has mailserver (no webserver), have one IPv4
address, and few IPv6 addresses. The IPv4 address configured on the
router, DNAT-ing the TCPv
Can someone tell me how a BIND 9 server selects what forwarder its going to
use? I read that BIND 8 used roundtrip time through a ping but I cannot find
how BIND 9 does that. Does it round-robin between the forwarders that are
set? Thanks in advance.
T
_
Unifiedroot is a scam. I suggest you do some due diligence on them before
you pay them any money. Let them know I gave you this heads up - I'm sure
they will appreciate it.
cheers
joe baptista
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 5:48 AM, ozgurs wrote:
> We want to buy a unified root domain,
> but they sa
Hello,
I can also confirm this for BIND 9.5.0-P2 for DNSSec enabled resolvers
using DLV (an ISP environment, arout 500-600 queries per second according to
BIND query log).
After several hours of operation, the server stopped answering on certain
cached records in signed zones (no packets ca
We want to buy a unified root domain,
but they say we can not use the domain only one word.
like
ozgurs
so that it opens
http://ozgurs
but we have to use a connected word to this TLD, like
example.ozgurs
here, my quetion comes! :)
i bet with my friend that we can not use the domain itself.
NOW
Hello!
(sorry for my trash-english)
I have a problem and finally i found out a "solution", but also i read
the thread about multiple PTRs are not recommended.
My configuration:
Have a router, two computers behind it. comp1 has webserver (no
mailserver), comp2 has mailserver (no webserver),
18 matches
Mail list logo
