I don't. I have a working DLZ setup.
Scott Baker wrote:
> Just out of curiosity, what real world scenario do you have 50 million
> records under one domain?
>
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinf
Andrew Ferk wrote:
>> What are the backend database options available? Is bind-sdb active
>> developed and is it production ready?
>
> You can use mysql with dlz. I have yet to get it successfully
> working, but that's another issue.
>
> One of the reasons I wanted to use a database was for the
I use DLZ w/ postgres. It's been working pretty good for me for a while
now.
-david
Andrew Ferk wrote:
>> What are the backend database options available? Is bind-sdb active
>> developed and is it production ready?
>>
>
> You can use mysql with dlz. I have yet to get it successfully
> work
> What are the backend database options available? Is bind-sdb active
> developed and is it production ready?
You can use mysql with dlz. I have yet to get it successfully
working, but that's another issue.
One of the reasons I wanted to use a database was for the speed
increase. I would probab
I currently have a split view dns configuration, with a view for internal
ips and a separate view for external ips. There are some names which need
to resolve the same for both views. I have implemented this in the past by
having common data in a separate file that was included by the zone files
i
I've just committed the update to 9.5.1, including the ARCH=x86_64
trick (which I verified on one of our amd64 test platforms). Thanks
for bringing this to my attention, and thanks to everyone that helped
out.
Doug
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@
On Mon, 29 Dec 2008, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
What is your syslogger configuration for /var/adm/messages,
/var/log/named, and /var/log/named.info ?
digg...@newblack# more /etc/syslog.conf
#ident "@(#)syslog.conf1.5 98/12/14 SMI" /* SunOS 5.0 */
#
# Copyright (c) 1991-1998 by Sun
What is your syslogger configuration for /var/adm/messages,
/var/log/named, and /var/log/named.info ?
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
On Mon, 29 Dec 2008, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
On Mon, 29 Dec 2008, Mike Diggins wrote:
When I start BIND on my Solaris 10 SPARC dual CPU (V210) system 9.4.2-P2,
I don't get the message "using 2 CPUs", but that's what I want. I
compiled it with './configure --prefix=/usr/local/bind --enable-threa
On Mon, 29 Dec 2008, Mark A. Moore wrote:
> I have setup our BIND Master & Slave servers with appropriate
> configuration in the named.conf. For some reason the zone files are not
> getting replicated from the Master to the slave. Do I have to initially
> create each of the zone files on the slav
I have setup our BIND Master & Slave servers with appropriate
configuration in the named.conf. For some reason the zone files are not
getting replicated from the Master to the slave. Do I have to initially
create each of the zone files on the slave so that updates are
replicated?
Thanks in adv
On Mon, 29 Dec 2008, Mike Zupan wrote:
> Is there anyway in a zone file for a master to include another file for more
> zone information?
$INCLUDE filename
See "Other Zone File Directives" in chapter 6 of the ARM. And read example
in chapter 4 of the ARM.
__
On Mon, 29 Dec 2008, Mike Diggins wrote:
> > > When I start BIND on my Solaris 10 SPARC dual CPU (V210) system 9.4.2-P2,
> > > I don't get the message "using 2 CPUs", but that's what I want. I
> > > compiled it with './configure --prefix=/usr/local/bind --enable-threads'
> > > and start it with '/
Is there anyway in a zone file for a master to include another file for more
zone information?
Thanks
Mike
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
I increased the logging to the debug level, but still no mention of it
using 2 CPUs. In fact, I don't get the line "found X CPUs, using Y worker
threads" at all, even mentioning one CPU. Even with the switch '-n 2", it
doesn't give any error that it didn't find two CPUs. Is that Linux only?
I
When doing a RNDC reload with Bind 9.5.1 we are getting the following
error.
This only happens if we list more than one master name server IP. If
we only have one IP in the "masters" statement it is fine. If we have
more than one then everything seems to die.
Dec 29 15:00:06 tnamed[8957]: zone.c
Volia - and I've no intention on updating dig yet.
; <<>> DiG 9.4.1-P1.1 <<>> crm.share-ideas.com CNAME @89.111.171.191
+norec
; (1 server found)
;; global options: printcmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 63456
;; flags: qr aa; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY:
17 matches
Mail list logo