I have confirmed that the ARCH=x86_64 trick resolved the issues with my
configuration. I have tested this with an authoritative and recursive
dns/bind95 port with modified Makefile.
I have not fully tested the acl.c and iptable.c since the patch suit my need.
Thanks!
--- On Tue, 12/23/08, Dou
At Mon, 22 Dec 2008 16:13:10 -0800,
Doug Barton wrote:
> And can someone please state affirmatively that the patches to acl.c
> and iptable.c do the right thing, with or without the patch to the port?
This patch completely fixed the hole in my test environment. With
this patch you don't need th
JINMEI Tatuya / wrote:
> At Tue, 2 Dec 2008 00:35:32 -0500,
> Vinny Abello wrote:
>
>> For what it's worth, I just want to contribute that I can
>> confirm this behavior on my systems as well. On BIND 9.5.0-P2,
>
> From an off-list discussion, I found there was indeed memory leak
At Mon, 22 Dec 2008 01:47:37 -0800 (PST),
y...@irc.pl wrote:
> I think to change to version 9.4.3 because of interesing feature
> "acache".
> I would like to speed up response time for my clients.
>
> My DNS server is mostly (95%) caching-only:
> NLWP USERNAME SWAP RSS MEMORY TIME CPU
>
Since you are digging @127.0.0.1, I can't tell for sure on which server you are
performing the dig. But based on the responses, I'd say you were performing
the dig on d62.test.net. d62 is authoritative for 168.192.in-addr.arpa but not
for 0/16.168.192.in-addr.arpa. (The NS record for 0/16.168
Matus UHLAR - fantomas says what?:
>> Chris Buxton says what?:
>> > /etc/default/sysklogd
>
> On 21.12.08 07:59, billious wrote:
>> Would that not be:
>> /etc/default/syslogd ?
>
> in debian, the package's name is sysklogd (although klogd was already
> split into another package).
Ah... Thanks.
Thanks for the response:
On Dec 22, 10:38 am, Kirk wrote:
> Bryce Fischer wrote:
> > On Dec 22, 9:52 am, Bryce Fischer wrote:
> >> I'm trying to use xname.org to use as secondary DNS servers. I have
> >> setup the following zone from my primary NS:
>
> >> (named.conf.local)
>
> >> zone "gwatdesi
Bryce Fischer wrote:
On Dec 22, 9:52 am, Bryce Fischer wrote:
I'm trying to use xname.org to use as secondary DNS servers. I have
setup the following zone from my primary NS:
(named.conf.local)
zone "gwatdesigns.com" {
type master;
file "/etc/bind/zones/gwatdesigns.com.db";
On Dec 22, 9:52 am, Bryce Fischer wrote:
> I'm trying to use xname.org to use as secondary DNS servers. I have
> setup the following zone from my primary NS:
>
> (named.conf.local)
>
> zone "gwatdesigns.com" {
> type master;
> file "/etc/bind/zones/gwatdesigns.com.db";
> al
I'm trying to use xname.org to use as secondary DNS servers. I have
setup the following zone from my primary NS:
(named.conf.local)
zone "gwatdesigns.com" {
type master;
file "/etc/bind/zones/gwatdesigns.com.db";
allow-transfer {
87.98.164.164; 195.234.42.1
Marc, Thanks for the reply.
I am particularly agreeable to your answer, in fact it was roaming my head,
but I was trying not to suggest it :-) to see if someone came up with it!
In fact i'm observing the same kind of behaviour also with Windows DNS
server
on windows 2003. My NAT box is running d
Hello,
I use BIND 9.3.5-P2.
I think to change to version 9.4.3 because of interesing feature
"acache".
I would like to speed up response time for my clients.
My DNS server is mostly (95%) caching-only:
NLWP USERNAME SWAP RSS MEMORY TIME CPU
7 named3294M 3299M21% 336:00:11 16%
In message
<4b18a8f75a6384449755bc7784073e935f6e788...@exch11.olympus.f5net.com>, Jack
Tavares writes:
> Thanks to everybody so far. I am still confused trying to figure this out.
>
> At the risk of looking stupid...
>
> Given this zone file.
>
> $TTL 500
> $ORIGIN 168.192.in-addr.arpa.
> @
Thanks to everybody so far. I am still confused trying to figure this out.
At the risk of looking stupid...
Given this zone file.
$TTL 500
$ORIGIN 168.192.in-addr.arpa.
@ IN SOA d62.test.net. hostmaster.d62.test.net.. 2008122201
10800 3600 604800 86400
NS
On 21.12.08 04:21, Jack Tavares wrote:
> as specified, wouldn't this zone then be non-authoritative
I believe BIND doesn't check NS Records when deciding if it should set the
"AA" flag and only takes care about the records being from zone
(master/slave) or authoritative source (for AA records) or
> Chris Buxton says what?:
> > /etc/default/sysklogd
On 21.12.08 07:59, billious wrote:
> Would that not be:
> /etc/default/syslogd ?
in debian, the package's name is sysklogd (although klogd was already split
into another package).
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fant
16 matches
Mail list logo
