Re: Install problem [resolved]

2008-12-16 Thread Fred Zinsli
Hello all Well out of curiosity I thought I would see what happened if I just installed bind, not bind9. When it went to install it asked me some questions about the original files it couldn't find and installed them. I then uninstalled bind and reinstalled binb9 as I wanted and it installed pro

Install problem

2008-12-16 Thread Fred Zinsli
Hello everyone I am attempting to install bind (chrooted) on my debian etch server. I frist installed bind using apt-get install bind9, then realized I wanted it chrooted, so I uninstalled it and removed the /etc/bind folder thninking I was being very cleaver. I then went to install bind as per

Re: Stuck glue records in the GTLD servers??

2008-12-16 Thread wes
If it were just a matter of the domain's authoritative name servers, you would be correct. But in order to use those name servers for other domains, the registrar has to submit them to the registry as HOST records. This is separate and unrelated to the nameserver settings on the domain itself, and

Re: dns cache performance

2008-12-16 Thread JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
At Tue, 16 Dec 2008 21:23:51 +0200, Sener ATAS wrote: > I use BIND 9.5.0-P2 on my FreeBSD 6.4 machine as a cache server. > My server has 1 gb ram and 1.4 ghz cpu. I want to improve respone time. > Is it possible with configure bind with "--enable-threads" options? It's *possible*, but threads

dns cache performance

2008-12-16 Thread Sener ATAS
Hi, I use BIND 9.5.0-P2 on my FreeBSD 6.4 machine as a cache server. My server has 1 gb ram and 1.4 ghz cpu. I want to improve respone time. Is it possible with configure bind with "--enable-threads" options? Or any other idea for it ? Not: My CPU is not dual core. Thanks.

Bind 9.5 configuration doubt

2008-12-16 Thread Reinaldo Matukuma
Hello. I'm in doubt about defining a SOA record to a zone. Is this correct and valid? $TTL86400 $ORIGIN teste.com. @ 1D IN SOA @ root ( 42 ; serial (d. adams) 3H

Re: Random nx name queries, anyone see this before?

2008-12-16 Thread Ian Sampson
Do you get an injected response at the same time not from the relevant root server? The only way would be to gather a tetheral dump to see if that is the case? On 16 Dec 2008, at 14:20, Alan Clegg wrote: Frank Behrens wrote: ponga2...@gmail.com wrote on 15 Dec 2008 16:34: I'd be very int

Re: Random nx name queries, anyone see this before?

2008-12-16 Thread Dave Sparro
Alan Clegg wrote: > ponga2...@gmail.com wrote: >> I'm seeing name queries from a couple clients on the network that >> occur around every two minutes - the queries are evidently random and >> are looking for A IN records of this form, as an example: >> >> ungzbvyf.lzghmccim >> >> They always look l

Re: Random nx name queries, anyone see this before?

2008-12-16 Thread Alan Clegg
Frank Behrens wrote: > ponga2...@gmail.com wrote on 15 Dec 2008 16:34: >> I'd be very interested in what others find. I do have an update and >> correction to my original post: >> >> The format is 9chars.8chars - as an example: >> qjnqrtfun.wxsifmgj >> Sometimes a colon appears, so the char list s

RE: NSLOOKUP not finding server

2008-12-16 Thread Dave
After months of failing to get this working. Within 10 minutes of joining this list i have found the solution! I needed to enable port 53 tcp AND UDP! Sorry to waste anyone's time. Regards DP From: bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org [mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Be

NSLOOKUP not finding server

2008-12-16 Thread Dave
Hi, I'm hoping someone can point out where I'm going wrong as i seem to be going round in circles! I am trying to create a DNS server for my office network. I have created a smb domain (mydomain.now) which i am able to join from my windows pc's but only while the old windows DNS server is

Re: Stats collection script for BIND 9.5 (and greater?)

2008-12-16 Thread Alexander Gall
On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 15:44:39 -0800, JINMEI Tatuya / $(b...@l@C#:H(B said: > At Mon, 15 Dec 2008 17:18:21 +0100, > Alexander Gall wrote: >> > http://members.iinet.com.au/~pyard...@ihug.com.au/#%5B%5BBIND%209.5%20DNS%20Stats%5D%5D >> >> This looks useful, thanks. However, ISC has chosen to c