Re: Regarding Parallel Support

2008-08-13 Thread Mark Andrews
> At Wed, 13 Aug 2008 09:20:42 +0400, > Dmitry Rybin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Where is it documented? My servers suffered greatly from what seems to b > e > > > exactly this problem and we pulled our hair out trying to figure out how > to > > > solve it. max-cache-size just doesn't

Re: Regarding Parallel Support

2008-08-13 Thread JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
At Wed, 13 Aug 2008 09:20:42 +0400, Dmitry Rybin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Where is it documented? My servers suffered greatly from what seems to be > > exactly this problem and we pulled our hair out trying to figure out how to > > solve it. max-cache-size just doesn't work in 9.4. > >

Re: Regarding Parallel Support

2008-08-12 Thread Dmitry Rybin
David Sparks wrote: > Dmitry Rybin wrote: >> Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > On 11.08.08 18:54, varun srivastava wrote: >> I just wanted to know whether bind has some specific multi processor or >> multi core support, to take advantage to the max ? >>

Re: Regarding Parallel Support

2008-08-12 Thread Dmitry Rybin
JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 wrote: > At Tue, 12 Aug 2008 17:51:06 +0400, > >> OK... This is well known bug. >> >> === named.conf === >> [...] >> options { >> max-cache-size 500M; >> }; >> >> [...] >> == >> named with threads (8 threads, 1 thread per CPU) >> Memory Usege grows ve

Re: Regarding Parallel Support

2008-08-12 Thread David Sparks
Dmitry Rybin wrote: > Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: >>> Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: On 11.08.08 18:54, varun srivastava wrote: > I just wanted to know whether bind has some specific multi processor or > multi core support, to take advantage to the max ? bind supports threads wh

Re: Regarding Parallel Support

2008-08-12 Thread JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
At Tue, 12 Aug 2008 17:51:06 +0400, > OK... This is well known bug. > > === named.conf === > [...] > options { > max-cache-size 500M; > }; > > [...] > == > named with threads (8 threads, 1 thread per CPU) > Memory Usege grows very quickly. Top memory usage - system li

Re: Regarding Parallel Support

2008-08-12 Thread Dmitry Rybin
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: >> Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: >>> On 11.08.08 18:54, varun srivastava wrote: I just wanted to know whether bind has some specific multi processor or multi core support, to take advantage to the max ? >>> bind supports threads which is what you want. Note

Re: Regarding Parallel Support

2008-08-12 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
> Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > > On 11.08.08 18:54, varun srivastava wrote: > >> I just wanted to know whether bind has some specific multi processor or > >> multi core support, to take advantage to the max ? > > > > bind supports threads which is what you want. Note that your OS has so > > su

Re: Regarding Parallel Support

2008-08-12 Thread Dmitry Rybin
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > On 11.08.08 18:54, varun srivastava wrote: >> I just wanted to know whether bind has some specific multi processor or >> multi core support, to take advantage to the max ? > > bind supports threads which is what you want. Note that your OS has so > support them too

Re: Regarding Parallel Support

2008-08-12 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 11.08.08 18:54, varun srivastava wrote: > I just wanted to know whether bind has some specific multi processor or > multi core support, to take advantage to the max ? bind supports threads which is what you want. Note that your OS has so support them too. -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [EMAIL PR

Regarding Parallel Support

2008-08-11 Thread varun srivastava
Hi, I just wanted to know whether bind has some specific multi processor or multi core support, to take advantage to the max ? Regards Varun