> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Hans F. Nordhaug
> Sent: Saturday, August 16, 2008 3:49 AM
> To: [bind-users]
> Subject: Re: Recursive queries fail if query source port is not fixed
>
> * Steven Stromer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-08-15]
Actually looks like the domain is also being used for Active Directory and the
domain controllers may have many subnets bound to the NICs for some reason.
Windows will register every IP address in DNS bound to the domain controller by
default as an A record for the domain itself.
-Vinny
>
I own a service that has mirrors all around the world. I'd like to
Bind to respond a DNS request of my A ADDRESSes differently, depending
on the IP block that made the request
For instance, from a computer from an ISP provider would have this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] etc]# host bbs.archlinux.org
bbs.ar
ListAcc wrote:
> Linux Addict wrote:
>> ListAcc wrote:
>>> Linux Addict wrote:
ListAcc wrote:
> Linux Addict wrote:
>> ListAcc wrote:
>>> Adam Tkac wrote:
>>>
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 09:55:30PM -0500, ListAcc wrote:
> Hello,
>
>>
Linux Addict wrote:
> ListAcc wrote:
>> Linux Addict wrote:
>>> ListAcc wrote:
Linux Addict wrote:
> ListAcc wrote:
>> Adam Tkac wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 09:55:30PM -0500, ListAcc wrote:
>>>
Hello,
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>
schilling wrote:
> I run into this dig wired result, is it normal? If it's normal, what's the
> purpose of doing this?
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Desktop]$ dig polk-fl.net
[...]
Well, it's not something that I'd do, but I don't know what the Polk
County Schools were wanting to do. It seems to be some ty
I run into this dig wired result, is it normal? If it's normal, what's the
purpose of doing this?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Desktop]$ dig polk-fl.net
;; Truncated, retrying in TCP mode.
; <<>> DiG 9.3.4-P1 <<>> polk-fl.net
;; global options: printcmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status:
At Thu, 21 Aug 2008 17:43:42 +0800,
"BroBind BroBind" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# rndc status
> number of zones: 622
> debug level: 0
> xfers running: 0
> xfers deferred: 0
> soa queries in progress: 0
> query logging is ON
> recursive clients: 903/75000
> tcp clients: 0/100
Next to routers, the outward-facing DNS is one of the
few parts of our network that talks to large numbers of
far-flung sites constantly.
Is there any metric presently in bind that we can look
at, say, from a cron job once a minute, that would let us know
that no root name servers
ListAcc wrote:
> Linux Addict wrote:
>> ListAcc wrote:
>>> Linux Addict wrote:
ListAcc wrote:
> Adam Tkac wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 09:55:30PM -0500, ListAcc wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>>> I have removed Bind 9.4.2
Thank you.
Martin McCormick WB5AGZ Stillwater, OK
Systems Engineer
OSU Information Technology Department Telecommunications Services Group
ListAcc wrote:
> Kirk wrote:
>> ListAcc wrote:
>>> Kirk wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>>> I have removed Bind 9.4.2 from CentOS with yum and compiled
>>> Bind 9.3.5-P2. I am having trouble using the old init script
>>> from the rpm setup previ
Tom Greaser wrote:
> IF so.
> What dose the upstream NS servers say is your NS servers are for your domain ?
> When you do a dig what dose the output show ?
Currently, upstream servers point to the right IP address of the
production server. That is why I am trying to move this address to the
ne
IF so.
What dose the upstream NS servers say is your NS servers are for your domain ?
When you do a dig what dose the output show ?
Or
Are you just trying to point your local users to use the newer 9.5.0.dfsg.P1-2
package box ?
>>> Cedric Lejeune <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 08/21/08 5:21 AM >>>
U
Hi,
Here's my recursive clients:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# rndc status
number of zones: 622
debug level: 0
xfers running: 0
xfers deferred: 0
soa queries in progress: 0
query logging is ON
recursive clients: 903/75000
tcp clients: 0/100
server is up and running
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]#
And our lsof:
[EM
Hi Again Marc,
The replies I get from dig ns . @ match the contents of
the db.cache file
/Pete
> Hi Marc,
> I loaded a new version from the net same time I upgraded bind .
> When I started receiving the checkhints warning I remove the ip6
entries
> - but that didn't help.
> Her
Unfortunately, MAC address are not 'hardcoded' in our firewall, at least
not thoses regarding DNS servers. One thing I have forgotten in my
previous post is that our mail router _is_ currently running pretty fine
using the new server. But as soon as we switch IP address, everything
goes wrong =
17 matches
Mail list logo
