> Offhand, nothing stands out for me in that config, but I'm not really a
> PIX expert. I've heard, however, that the Cisco "fixups" sometimes
> create problems. Can anyone comment on whether "
>
> fixup protocol dns maximum-length 1024" is likely to exhibit the behavior des
> cribed earlier?
The log should get less noisy in the next release.
2409. [bug] Only log that we disabled EDNS processing if we were
subsequently successful. [RT #18029]
Currently the log indicated when we have disabled EDNS processing
due to timeouts. Mis-handling of EDNS q
>I wrote, in part:
>> Another question arises - if the default max-cache-size is 32M
>> (and titania has 2G of memory), and the cache is supposedly full,
>> then why is the named_dumpdb file I created yesterday only 818340
>> bytes long?
and Mark Andrews replied:
> named_dumpdb will usually
I doubt that this is at all pertinent, but I was experiencing similar
behavior once I patched a client a few weeks ago and took them off
port 53. Recursive requests were failing three out of every four
times they were made, yet digs with trace worked. The company uses a
crappy Netgear firew
Andrey G. Sergeev (AKA Andris) wrote:
> Greetings Kevin,
>
>
> Thu, 14 Aug 2008 16:47:02 -0400 Kevin Darcy wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>
>>> I also recommend you to restrict the AXFR queries.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> Why? It's public information, and as you yourself have just
>> demonstrated, leaving zo
Offhand, nothing stands out for me in that config, but I'm not really a
PIX expert. I've heard, however, that the Cisco "fixups" sometimes
create problems. Can anyone comment on whether "
fixup protocol dns maximum-length 1024" is likely to exhibit the behavior
described earlier?
http://www.exp
Hello Latif,
Fri, 15 Aug 2008 15:55:38 -0400 Binmakhashen, Latif wrote:
> After upgrading to bind-9.5.0-P2, I get many of the following message
> in the log. Is this something I need to worry about or can I just
> suppress it?
Are there any SOHO routers between the box on which BIND is running
After upgrading to bind-9.5.0-P2, I get many of the following message in
the log. Is this something I need to worry about or can I just suppress
it?
I don't' get a response from the command line for the domains associated
with the error and I don't seem get anything about most of them from
using
On Aug 12, 2008, at 2:12 PM, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 wrote:
> At Tue, 12 Aug 2008 11:36:26 -0700,
> Kai Lanz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Aug 11 04:01:14 pangea named[10832]: resolver.c:3239: unexpected
>> error:
>> Aug 11 04:01:14 pangea named[10832]: isc_timer_create: out of memory
>
> Som
At Fri, 15 Aug 2008 10:27:13 +1000,
Mark Andrews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > fctx 0x87b7b20(images.yandex.ru/A'): query
> > > > fctx 0x87b7b20(images.yandex.ru/A'): done
> > >
> > > This seems to indicate creating a query socket somehow failed. Can
> > > you build BIND by hand to see if yo
At Thu, 14 Aug 2008 10:46:18 -0500,
Walter Gould <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have found my problem. Your above statement "it seems to be handling a
> high volume of queries (several thousands concurrent clients)" was right
> on target. I decided to look more closely at the traffic that was
>
I'm currently developing a DNS utility which is working greatly with a
single qname in a query. However, if I try to perform a query for
multiple qnames I got a format error.
I've checked the datagram with Wireshark and the packet is well
formed, and by reading the RFCs I can't find anything releva
As Kevin has said, this is likely in the firewall config.
Try adding (actually removing):
no fixup protocol dns
and then probably also:
access-list 120 permit tcp any host 211.148.192.133 eq domain
access-list 120 permit tcp any host 211.148.192.134 eq domain
access-list 120 permit tcp any host
At Thu, 14 Aug 2008 11:05:26 -0700,
"David Sparks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You could add a cmdline option to configure to override the "calculated"
> value. ie:
>
> ./configure --max-fd=256
We've already provided this knob in a different form: ISC_SOCKET_FDSETSIZE.
The difficult part is t
Just for the record. This is the same behavior that I have reported in
the thread "Recursive queries fail if query source port is not fixed":
http://marc.info/?t=12186132932
(It's a long thread, but after a while I discover that using trace
works - see http://marc.info/?l=bind-users&m=121
15 matches
Mail list logo