Re: [Bf-committers] Simple steps to get an harmonious collaboration

2021-06-04 Thread Campbell Barton via Bf-committers
On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 7:51 PM Sybren A. Stüvel via Bf-committers wrote: > > On Wed, 2 Jun 2021 at 07:56, Campbell Barton via Bf-committers < > bf-committers@blender.org> wrote: > > > If the proposed policies are followed to the letter, we end up in > > situations where extra review iterations wou

Re: [Bf-committers] Simple steps to get an harmonious collaboration

2021-06-04 Thread Sebastian Parborg via Bf-committers
I think most of these issues with be solved when we have CI bots? In most bigger open source projects I contribute to, the bots makes sure that everything is formated correctly and that there are no new warning/errors in the code. If there are any issues, they will post a comment pointing the iss

Re: [Bf-committers] Simple steps to get an harmonious collaboration

2021-06-04 Thread Sybren A . Stüvel via Bf-committers
On Wed, 2 Jun 2021 at 07:56, Campbell Barton via Bf-committers < bf-committers@blender.org> wrote: > If the proposed policies are followed to the letter, we end up in > situations where extra review iterations would be required for running > clang-format, stripping what-space and spelling mistakes

Re: [Bf-committers] Simple steps to get an harmonious collaboration

2021-06-02 Thread Campbell Barton via Bf-committers
On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 6:20 PM Sergey Sharybin via Bf-committers wrote: > > Campbell, those are valid points, but here is what I propose: > > (a) Focus on making already-agreed-on topics public, go into more > specific cases later. Sergey, sounds good. Since these rules are on our official wiki I

Re: [Bf-committers] Simple steps to get an harmonious collaboration

2021-06-02 Thread Campbell Barton via Bf-committers
On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 5:22 PM Ray Molenkamp via Bf-committers wrote: > > I'm somewhat confused on the goal some of the (proposed?) rules. > But I'll just pick on the "Patch description should match the > commit message."-rule for now not to make this longer than it > needs to be. > > Most people

Re: [Bf-committers] Simple steps to get an harmonious collaboration

2021-06-02 Thread Sergey Sharybin via Bf-committers
Campbell, those are valid points, but here is what I propose: (a) Focus on making already-agreed-on topics public, go into more specific cases later. (b) Until the future of the Phabricator is known, do not spend too much time in finding Phabricator-specific solutions for the cases we want to cove

Re: [Bf-committers] Simple steps to get an harmonious collaboration

2021-06-02 Thread Ray Molenkamp via Bf-committers
I'm somewhat confused on the goal some of the (proposed?) rules. But I'll just pick on the "Patch description should match the commit message."-rule for now not to make this longer than it needs to be.  Most people are much more verbose in their patch description, some have visual aids (images/cli

Re: [Bf-committers] Simple steps to get an harmonious collaboration

2021-06-01 Thread Campbell Barton via Bf-committers
Hi, there are a few cases this document doesn't cover (understandably as they're not so typical). How to best make updates to a patch? While proposing changes and having the patch author apply them is almost always preferred, there are times when it is less t

[Bf-committers] Simple steps to get an harmonious collaboration

2021-06-01 Thread Sergey Sharybin via Bf-committers
Hi, Just a quick note. The bf-admin team worked on several process related documents to ensure a pleasant and efficient development process. Today we've updated wiki with the patch review process: https://wiki.blender.org/wiki/Process/Patch_Review Feedback is welcome. Best regards, - Sergey - -