[bess] Comments on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df

Hi Authors, I had a look on your draft and I have some concerns/questions that I would like to discuss. I like the fact of being able to tune the pref DF election per VLAN range, however: * Don't you think that using a local configuration may open to inconsistent configurations resultin

Re: [bess] WG adoption poll and IPR poll for draft-snr-bess-evpn-loop-protect

Hi all, This adoption call is running for a long time. The WG adoption was a bit tough or at least unusual. I hold on this call waiting for a sync-up with my co-chair to decide how we proceed. We keep you posted asap. Stephane From: Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)

bess@ietf.org

Hi Folks, Many thanks for these outcomes and resolution. I’ll add a comment on the datatracker for the loop-protect draft and I’ll proceed with the adoption of the isid-cmacflush. Stephane From: Ali Sajassi (sajassi) Sent: samedi 12 octobre 2019 02:32 To: bess-cha...@ietf.org; be

Re: [bess] WG adoption and IP poll for draft-snr-bess-pbb-evpn-isid-cmacflush

Hi, We have now a consensus to adopt this document. Authors please publish the draft using -ietf-. Thanks, From: BESS < bess-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of Stephane Litkowski < slitkows.i...@gmail.com> Date: Thursday, Sep

[bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df

Hello WG, This email starts a two weeks Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df-04 [1]. This poll runs until * the 5th Of November *. We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in complian

[bess] Shepherd's review of draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-fast-failover

Hi, Please find below my review of the document. Nits: Checking nits according to https://www.ietf.org/id-info/checklist : == There are 1 instance of lines with non-RFC6890-compliant IPv4 addresses

Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df

Hi Luc André, Thanks for your feedback. It is always better to share comments on the list so other people can react too. Stephane From: Luc André Burdet Sent: mercredi 23 octobre 2019 03:38 To: slitkows.i...@gmail.com; bess@ietf.org; draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref...@ietf.org Cc: bess-

[bess] WG adoption poll for draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-mvpn-seamless-interop

Hello, This email begins a two-weeks WG adoption poll for draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-mvpn-seamless-interop [1] . Please review the draft and post any comments to the BESS working group list. We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this Document, to ensure t

Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df

Hi Authors, The poll is ending soon, and if I'm not mistaken, I'm missing the IPR poll replies from Tony P. and Wen L. Tony, Wen, Could you please reply to the IPR poll ? Thanks ! From: slitkows.i...@gmail.com Sent: mardi 22 octobre 2019 16:46 To: bess@ietf.org; draft-ietf-

Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df

Hi WG, Authors, Poll is now over. There is no blocking point to move forward with this draft. Brgds, Stephane From: slitkows.i...@gmail.com Sent: lundi 4 novembre 2019 14:58 To: bess@ietf.org; draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref...@ietf.org; w...@juniper.net; p...@juniper.net Subj

[bess] Chair review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates

Hi, Before moving forward to IESG, here is my review of the document: Section 2: "Note that these are to be applied to EVPN only, even though sometimes they may sound to be updates to [ RFC7117] or [ RFC7524]

Re: [bess] WG adoption poll for draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-mvpn-seamless-interop

Hi Authors and WG, The document is adopted as a WG item. Authors, Pls republish the document using -ietf- Thanks, Stephane From: Ali Sajassi (sajassi) Sent: lundi 28 octobre 2019 17:34 To: slitkows.i...@gmail.com; bess@ietf.org Cc: bess-cha...@ietf.org Subject: Re:

Re: [bess] WG Adoption and IPR Poll for draft-litkowski-bess-rfc5549revision-00

Support, I’m not aware of any IPR. From: BESS mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org> > on behalf of "Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)" mailto:matthew.bo...@nokia.com> > Date: Wednesday, November 27, 2019 at 7:37 AM To: "bess@ietf.org " mailto:bess@ietf.org> > Cc: "bess-cha...@ietf.or

Re: [bess] WG Adoption and IPR Poll for draft-litkowski-bess-rfc5549revision-00

Hi Sasha, The changes to RFC5549 are: * Changing the NH encoding for AFI/SAFI 1/128 * Enable the behavior for AFI/SAFI 1/129 (same as AFI/SAFI 1/128) The fact of doing it in BESS has been agreed by the ADs (INT and RTG) as we only changes the VPN SAFIs. Martin, our AD, is

Re: [bess] WG Adoption and IPR Poll for draft-litkowski-bess-rfc5549revision-00

Hi Robert, Please see some replies inline. Brgds, From: Robert Raszuk Sent: mercredi 27 novembre 2019 22:18 To: Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB) Cc: bess@ietf.org; bess-cha...@ietf.org Subject: Re: [bess] WG Adoption and IPR Poll for draft-litkowski-bess-rfc5549revision-00 I do not s

Re: [bess] WG Adoption and IPR Poll for draft-litkowski-bess-rfc5549revision-00

Hi Robert, Thinking about future, I’m not sure that using only length of NH is a good thing. Of course, with IPv4 vs IPv6, it works. But what happens if in the future we have different NH types using a common size ? How do you ensure that the NH is correctly encoded ? If you want to be 100%

[bess] WG adoption poll and IPR poll for draft-zzhang-bess-bgp-multicast-controller

Hello, This email begins a two-weeks WG adoption poll for and draft-zzhang-bess-bgp-multicast-controller-02 [1] . For information, it's companion document (draft-zzhang-bess-bgp-multicast-03) is also polled for WG adoption in a separate email. Please review the draft and post any comments

[bess] WG adoption and IPR poll for draft-zzhang-bess-bgp-multicast-03

Hello, This email begins a two-weeks WG adoption poll for and draft-zzhang-bess-bgp-multicast-03 [1] . For information, it's companion document (draft-zzhang-bess-bgp-multicast-controller-02) is also polled for WG adoption in a separate email. Please review the draft and post any comments

Re: [bess] Shepherd's review of draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-fast-failover

Hi Greg, I wish you an happy new year. Thanks for your feedback, please find my replies inline. (Trimming solved issues) Brgds, From: Greg Mirsky Sent: mercredi 4 décembre 2019 23:22 To: slitkows.i...@gmail.com; BESS ; bess-cha...@ietf.org Subject: RE: Shepherd's review of dra

Re: [bess] Shepherd's review of draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-fast-failover

Hi Greg, More inline, From: Greg Mirsky mailto:gregimir...@gmail.com> > Sent: mercredi 4 décembre 2019 23:22 To: slitkows.i...@gmail.com ; BESS mailto:bess@ietf.org> >; bess-cha...@ietf.org Subject: RE: Shepherd's review

Re: [bess] WG Last Call and Implementation Poll for draft-ietf-bess-rfc5549revision-00

Thanks Acee. Makes sense. I’ll take care of the modifications. Stephane From: BESS On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee) Sent: mardi 7 janvier 2020 17:12 To: Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB) ; bess@ietf.org Subject: Re: [bess] WG Last Call and Implementation Poll for draft-ietf-bess-rfc5549re

Re: [bess] WG Last Call and Implementation Poll for draft-ietf-bess-rfc5549revision-00

Support From: BESS On Behalf Of Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB) Sent: lundi 6 janvier 2020 18:53 To: bess@ietf.org Subject: [bess] WG Last Call and Implementation Poll for draft-ietf-bess-rfc5549revision-00 This email starts a two weeks Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-bess-rfc5549revis

[bess] WGLC , IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-03

Hi WG, This email starts a two weeks Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-03 [2] Please review the draft and send any comments to the BESS list. Also, please indicate if you support publishing the draft as a standards track RFC. This poll runs until Fri 31th Januar

Re: [bess] WG adoption and IPR poll for draft-zzhang-bess-bgp-multicast-03

The document is adopted. Authors please republish using -ietf- From: slitkows.i...@gmail.com Sent: lundi 6 janvier 2020 15:15 To: bess@ietf.org Cc: bess-cha...@ietf.org; draft-zzhang-bess-bgp-multic...@ietf.org Subject: WG adoption and IPR poll for draft-zzhang-bess-bgp-multicast-03

Re: [bess] WG adoption poll and IPR poll for draft-zzhang-bess-bgp-multicast-controller

Hi WG, The document is adopted. Authors, pls republish using -ietf- Thanks From: slitkows.i...@gmail.com Sent: lundi 6 janvier 2020 15:13 To: bess@ietf.org Cc: bess-cha...@ietf.org Subject: WG adoption poll and IPR poll for draft-zzhang-bess-bgp-multicast-controller Hello,

Re: [bess] Shepherd's review of draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-fast-failover

Hi Greg, I think there is still a misunderstanding on the proposed encoding 😊 I may not have been fully clear, sorry. Here is what you have: 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1

Re: [bess] Shepherd's review of draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-fast-failover

I’m fine with the proposal From: Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang Sent: vendredi 31 janvier 2020 20:44 To: Greg Mirsky ; slitkows.i...@gmail.com Cc: BESS ; bess-cha...@ietf.org Subject: RE: Shepherd's review of draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-fast-failover Hi Greg, Stephane, The first MAY should actua

[bess] WG adoption and IP poll for draft-wsv-bess-extended-evpn-optimized-ir

Hi, This email begins a two-weeks WG adoption poll for draft-wsv-bess-extended-evpn-optimized-ir [1] Please review the draft and post any comments to the BESS working group list. We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this Document, to ensure that IPR ha

Re: [bess] WGLC , IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-03

This poll is now closed without any objection to progress. However (expect if I have missed it), I haven't heard about any implementation. Is there any known implementation ? If NO, is the WG against progressing the document without an implementation ? Feedback required by the end of the w

Re: [bess] Shepherd's review of draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-fast-failover

Hi Greg, Looks good to me. There is just a typo on: “ 7.2. BFD Discriminator Extention Type » s/Extention/Extension Stephane From: Greg Mirsky Sent: samedi 1 février 2020 22:22 To: slitkows.i...@gmail.com Cc: Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang ; BESS ; bess-cha...@ietf.org Subject

Re: [bess] WG adoption and IP poll for draft-wsv-bess-extended-evpn-optimized-ir

Hi, Despite the limited number of replies, we have seen enough support and no objection to progress further. The document is adopted as a WG document. Authors, Please republish the doc using -ietf-. Thanks, Stephane From: slitkows.i...@gmail.com Sent: mardi 4 févr

Re: [bess] WG adoption and IP poll for draft-wsv-bess-extended-evpn-optimized-ir

Hi Patrice, We have seen support from various people which means that there is interest, at least enough to make the document adopted. If you had some comments and objections you were completely free to raise your voice during the adoption call, but not after the adoption has been closed.

[bess] Shepherd's Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df

Hi Authors, Here is my review of the document: Please look at the nits and fix them. https://www6.ietf.org/tools/idnits?url=https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft -ietf-bess-ev

[bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-irb-mcast-04

Hi WG, This email starts a two weeks Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-irb-mcast-04 [2] Please review the draft and send any comments to the BESS list. Also, please indicate if you support publishing the draft as a standards track RFC. This poll runs until 11th March 2020.

[bess] Chair review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-virtual-eth-segment-05

Hi Authors, Please find below my chair review: Nits: == Missing Reference: 'ETH-OAM' is mentioned on line 606, but not defined == Missing Reference: 'MPLS-OAM' is mentioned on line 612, but not defined == Missing Reference: 'PW-OAM' is mentioned on line 612, but not defined

[bess] IETF 107 BESS meeting will be cancelled

Hi WG, Due to new coming corporate travel restrictions associated to this Coronavirus, there will be no chair or secretary attending the IETF 107 physically. We will have to cancel the BESS sessions unfortunately. For your information, we received only 2 slots requests for now, while in

Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-irb-mcast-04

Hi, This WGLC is now closed. There was an implementation claim, so document will be able to progress. We will proceed with a review as a next step. Stephane From: slitkows.i...@gmail.com Sent: mercredi 26 février 2020 15:25 To: 'BESS' Cc: bess-cha...@ietf.org Subject: WGLC, IPR

Re: [bess] BESS interim meeting poll - please participate before 11th April

Hi folks, Just a reminder to provide your availabilities for a BESS interim meeting. Doodle poll will close on Friday. Thanks, From: Mankamana Mishra (mankamis) Sent: jeudi 2 avril 2020 18:46 To: bess@ietf.org Cc: bess-cha...@ietf.org; Martin Vigoureux Subject: BESS interim meeti

Re: [bess] Taking slot requests for interim meeting - Last week of April

Hi Gyan, You need to have a draft published to get a slot. Stephane From: BESS On Behalf Of Gyan Mishra Sent: samedi 18 avril 2020 21:55 To: Linda Dunbar Cc: bess@ietf.org; Mankamana Mishra (mankamis) Subject: Re: [bess] Taking slot requests for interim meeting - Last week of April

[bess] new WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy-05

Hi WG, Following the discussion and significant document update, we are starting a new Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy-05 This poll runs until the 1st of June. Please read carefully the document and raise any concern about the changes that have been introd

Re: [bess] new WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy-05

Hi Authors, Please update the document with the latest comments and we will then proceed to the next step. Stephane From: slitkows.i...@gmail.com Sent: lundi 18 mai 2020 09:54 To: bess@ietf.org Cc: bess-cha...@ietf.org Subject: new WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy-05

Re: [bess] Closing on Stephane's open issue with draft-ietf-bess-datacenter-gateway

Hi Adrian, My point is really tied to what will happen when RTC is enabled (considering draft-ietf-idr-rtc-no-rt). The behavior will be to drop the routes that don't have an RT which will break existing Internet families behavior. " When RTC is applied, on a particular BGP session, to routes of ot

[bess] FW: Closing on Stephane's open issue with draft-ietf-bess-datacenter-gateway => Requesting feedback from IDR

Hi IDR WG, We have a draft that was on WGLC which introduces the usage of Route Targets on Internet address families to allow automated filtering of gateway routes. I raised a concern on a potential issue happening when Route Target constraint is deployed on these sessions. Internet address famil

Re: [bess] FW: Closing on Stephane's open issue with draft-ietf-bess-datacenter-gateway => Requesting feedback from IDR

Hi Robert, Thanks for your feedback. Please find some comments inline. Stephane From: Robert Raszuk Sent: lundi 8 juin 2020 11:55 To: slitkows.i...@gmail.com Cc: idr@ietf. org ; BESS Subject: Re: [bess] FW: Closing on Stephane's open issue with draft-ietf-bess-datacenter-gateway

Re: [bess] FW: Closing on Stephane's open issue with draft-ietf-bess-datacenter-gateway => Requesting feedback from IDR

I’m ok with that, but in such a case, you have to ensure that everything will work fine when RTC is used: at least specify the behavior when no RT are attached. As mentioned, rt-no-rt draft currently says that routes are not advertised. From: Robert Raszuk Sent: lundi 8 juin 2020 17:07 To:

Re: [bess] Request BESS WG adoption for draft-dunbar-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage-07

Poll is expected next week (you can check the wiki). From: Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB) Sent: vendredi 19 juin 2020 11:26 To: Linda Dunbar ; bess@ietf.org; Stephane Litkowski ; Mankamana Mishra (mankamis) Subject: Re: Request BESS WG adoption for draft-dunbar-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage-07 Cor

[bess] WG adoption and IPR poll for draft-dunbar-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage-07

Hello, This email begins a two-weeks WG adoption poll for draft-dunbar-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage-07 [1] . Please review the draft and post any comments to the BESS working group list. We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this Document, to ensure that IPR h

[bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-ping

Hello WG, This email starts a two weeks Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-ping-02 [1]. This poll runs until * the 20th Of July *. We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance

Re: [bess] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-bess-rfc5549revision-04

Hi Christer, Thanks for your comments. For your information, this document is just a revision of RFC5549, so 99,9% of the text is just copy/paste from the existing RFC. Of course, we can improve things. I'll take care of your comments for a next revision. For the IANA section, as IANA will not h

[bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-geneve-01

Hello WG, This email starts a two weeks Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-geneve-01 [1]. This poll runs until * the 27th Of July *. We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance w

Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-ping

Authors, Please address the comments received during the WGLC (especially regarding IANA section). We haven't heard about any implementation during the WGLC. We will have to ask if WG agrees to proceed without implementation as per our policy. Brgds, Stephane From: slitko

Re: [bess] WG adoption and IPR poll for draft-dunbar-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage-07

We have received all the IPR poll replies and the draft got a good amount of support. The document is adopted as a WG document. Authors, Please republish using -ietf-. Thanks, From: slitkows.i...@gmail.com Sent: mardi 23 juin 2020 14:14 To: bess@ietf.org Subject: WG adoption

Re: [bess] Murray Kucherawy's Discuss on draft-ietf-bess-rfc5549revision-04: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Hi Murray, I have uploaded a new revision that clarifies the IANA section. -Original Message- From: Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker Sent: mercredi 26 août 2020 21:01 To: The IESG Cc: draft-ietf-bess-rfc5549revis...@ietf.org; bess-cha...@ietf.org; bess@ietf.org; Matthew Bocci Subject

Re: [bess] Shepherd's Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df

Hi Jorge, Please find additional feedback inline. (Stripping things we agree on) Stephane From: Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View) Sent: vendredi 19 juin 2020 20:37 To: slitkows.i...@gmail.com; draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref...@ietf.org; bess-cha...@ietf.org; bess@ietf.org Subj

Re: [bess] draft-ietf-bess-evpn-virtual-eth-segment-06 - review

Hi Authors, Please fix these comments as part of the draft refresh. The draft is expired now. We need a new version before proceeding. Thanks, From: Luc André Burdet Sent: mardi 15 septembre 2020 20:32 To: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-virtual-eth-segment.auth...@ietf.org Cc: draft-ietf-bes

[bess] WGLC and IPR poll on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-ipvpn-interworking-03

Hello WG, This email starts a three weeks Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-ipvpn-interworking-03 [1]. We add an additional week due to the upcoming IETF meeting. This poll runs until * the 30th Of November *. We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that

Re: [bess] WGLC and IPR poll on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-ipvpn-interworking-03

Authors, Please address the comment that have been raised during the WGLC. I’ll provide my chair review soon Brgds, Stephane From: BESS mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org> > on behalf of "slitkows.i...@gmail.com " mailto:slitkows.i...@gmail.com> >

[bess] WG adoption for draft-skr-bess-evpn-redundant-mcast-source

Hello, This email begins a two-weeks WG adoption poll for draft-skr-bess-evpn-redundant-mcast-source [1]. Please review the draft and post any comments to the BESS working group list. We are also polling for knowled

[bess] WG Last Call, IPR and Implementation Poll for draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-evpn-aggregation-label-04

This email starts a two-week working group last call for draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-evpn-aggregation-label-04 [1] Please review the draft and send any comments to the BESS list. Also, please indicate if you support publishing the draft as a standards track RFC. This poll runs until the 28th Decem

Re: [bess] Éric Vyncke's Abstain on draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-fast-failover-13: (with COMMENT)

Hi Eric, Speaking as BESS WG chair, you raised a very valid point on the publication of documents that have no implementation (or plan of implementation). This is also a concern that I have in general, as we cannot really prove that a technology/specification is working properly if it hasn't be

Re: [bess] WG Last Call, IPR and Implementation Poll for draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-evpn-aggregation-label-04

We are still missing couple of IPR replies to close the WGLC: Eric, Ice (their email contact has to be updated). In addition, we haven't received any reply regarding an existing implementation. Is anyone aware of an implementation ? Brgds, Stephane From: BESS mailto:bess-bo

Re: [bess] draft-ietf-bess-evpn-ipvpn-interworking chair review

Hi Jorge, Thanks for the new version. Few additional comments on the new text: Section 4. a. “This attribute list may contain”. I think we can use “MAY contain”, right ? C) 2) The statement is unclear to me. Let’s say that I have an IGP route or static route in the VRF that needs

[bess] Last mile for WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-ipvpn-interworking-04 => need IDR review

Hi IDR WG, We are in the last mile for the WGLC of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-ipvpn-interworking-04 in BESS WG. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-ipvpn-interworking Couple of comments from our groups have been already addressed. As BESS WG co-chair, I would like to get yo

Re: [bess] WG adoption for draft-skr-bess-evpn-redundant-mcast-source => need review from WG

Hi, We haven’t received a lot of feedback during the poll. The draft can’t be adopted now. We would like to encourage the WG to review the draft and extend the poll close date to 1/18. If we haven’t received more feedback, the document will not be adopted (but could still be adopted late

Re: [bess] WG Last Call, IPR and Implementation Poll for draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-evpn-aggregation-label-04

Hi, We got all the IPR disclosures now. And we had confirmation of proof of concept. The document will progress to the next step. Brgds, Stephane From: Wen Lin Sent: lundi 14 décembre 2020 17:43 To: Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang ; slitkows.i...@gmail.com; draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-evpn-

Re: [bess] WG adoption for draft-skr-bess-evpn-redundant-mcast-source => need review from WG

Hi, We got additional support for this draft to make it adopted by the working group. This email closes the on going and the draft is adopted as a WG document. Authors, Please republish the document as -ietf- Thanks From: Gyan Mishra Sent: vendredi 15 janvier 2021 05:53 T

[bess] WG Last Call, IPR and Implementation Poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-irb-extended-mobility-01

This email starts a two-week working group last call for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-irb-extended-mobility-01 [1] Please review the draft and send any comments to the BESS list. Also, please indicate if you support publishing the draft as a standards track RFC. This poll runs until Feb

Re: [bess] WG Last Call, IPR and Implementation Poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-irb-extended-mobility-01

Hi Authors, Please address the comments raised by the WG members before we move forward. I have fixed the dependency to the individual draft, so now the IPR appears on the WG doc. Brgds, Stephane From: Acee Lindem (acee) Sent: lundi 18 janvier 2021 18:25 To: slitkows.i...@gma

Re: [bess] Primary agenda posted

Hi folks, This agenda is a preliminary agenda. With the number of slot requests we have received in the last few days, we may have to prioritize some presentations (major updates, hot topics…) , so the agenda may change in the next few days (with new topics coming in, and some going out).

Re: [bess] Shepherd's Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df

Hi Jorge, Looks good to me. For D flag as mentioned, we have to explicitly state support/not support for all existing (RFCed or almost RFCed) DF types. Thanks for solving this. Stephane From: Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View) Sent: lundi 8 mars 2021 18:58 To: Luc Andr

[bess] WG adoption and IPR poll for draft-brissette-bess-evpn-l2gw-proto

Hello, This email begins a two-weeks WG adoption poll for draft-brissette-bess-evpn-l2gw-proto [1]. Please review the draft and post any comments to the BESS working group list. We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this document, to ensure that IPR ha

[bess] Cross WG review request for draft-ietf-bier-evpn

HI folks, The BIER WG is in the last mile of review for draft-ietf-bier-evpn and requests our review on the document before progressing further. Please have a deep look at it and provide your feedback or concerns. Please close the review by April 20th. Thanks in advance, Step

[bess] New short WGLC for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy-07

Hi WG, We got final updates from authors on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy. I'm opening a new short Working Group Last Call (to be closed on 4/19) to get any last comments before moving the document to IESG. Feel free to send comments to the list before next Monday. Thanks, St

Re: [bess] WG adoption and IPR poll for draft-brissette-bess-evpn-l2gw-proto

Hi WG, We are currently missing the IPR poll reply from Ali regarding this draft. Ali, Could you please reply to the IPR poll ? Thanks, From: Luc André Burdet Sent: mercredi 7 avril 2021 18:45 To: slitkows.i...@gmail.com; bess@ietf.org Subject: Re: [bess] WG adoption and IP

Re: [bess] WG adoption and IPR poll for draft-brissette-bess-evpn-l2gw-proto

Hi, We’ve received all the IPR poll replies and got support and no objection to adopt this document. Authors, Please republish the document as -ietf-. Brgds, Stephane From: Ali Sajassi (sajassi) Sent: mercredi 14 avril 2021 04:08 To: slitkows.i...@gmail.com; bess@ietf.org

[bess] WG and IPR poll adoption poll for draft-krattiger-evpn-modes-interop

Hello, This email begins a two-weeks WG adoption poll for draft-krattiger-evpn-modes-interop-03 [1]. Please review the draft and post any comments to the BESS working group list. We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this document, to ensure that IPR h

[bess] New short WGLC for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb

Hi WG, We got final updates from authors on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb. I'm opening a new short Working Group Last Call (to be closed on 5/10) to get any last comments before moving to the next step. However, the document having normative references to EVPN PREF DF, and PER-MCAST-FLOW-

Re: [bess] WG and IPR poll adoption poll for draft-krattiger-evpn-modes-interop

Hi WG, We had good support on this document, the document is adopted as a WG doc. Authors, Please publish the doc as -ietf- Thanks, From: Satya Mohanty (satyamoh) Sent: vendredi 23 avril 2021 23:48 To: slitkows.i...@gmail.com; bess@ietf.org Cc: bess-cha...@ietf.org Subje

Re: [bess] WG and IPR poll adoption poll for draft-krattiger-evpn-modes-interop

Hi Muthu, (Speaking as co-chair) Thanks for the feedback on the intended status. This has to be clarified however this is not a blocking point for the adoption. We have time to figure out the intended status of the document with the authors/WG and adjust the text accordingly. Brgd

[bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-mh-pa-02

Hello WG, This email starts a two weeks Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-mh-pa-02 [1]. This poll runs until * the 7th of June *. We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in complia

[bess] WG POLL: Moving forward draft-ietf-bess-evpn-fast-df-recovery by dropping "Handshake" option

Hi WG, Just as a reminder, draft-ietf-bess-evpn-fast-df-recovery currently proposes two options: 1) use time synchronization, 2) Use handshake. We have issues moving forward the draft because of some controversy on the handshake option while the time sync option seems to have implementation

Re: [bess] WG POLL: Moving forward draft-ietf-bess-evpn-fast-df-recovery by dropping "Handshake" option

Hi WG, We have received any objection and have seen some support for dropping the handshake options for the current draft. Thus, the WG is fine with the proposed change. Authors, Please proceed with the removal and progress the draft to closure. Thanks, Stephane From: B

Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-mh-pa-02

Hi folks, We are still missing IPR replies from Ali, Bin Wen, and Edward Leyton to close the WGLC. Authors, Please also start to address the comments that have been raised by Anoop. Thanks, From: slitkows.i...@gmail.com Sent: lundi 31 mai 2021 09:31 To: 'BESS' Cc: bess-

[bess] WG Last Call, IPR and Implementation Poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-fxc

Hi, This email starts a two-week working group last call for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-fxc [1] Please review the draft and send any comments to the BESS list. Also, please indicate if you support publishing the draft as a Standards Track RFC. This poll runs until the 12th October 2021. We a

Re: [bess] WG Last Call, IPR and Implementation Poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-fxc

Hi folks, We are missing IPR poll reply from Ali. We’ll proceed to the next step as soon as we clear the IPR poll. Brgds, Stephane From: Patrice Brissette (pbrisset) Sent: jeudi 30 septembre 2021 01:34 To: slitkows.i...@gmail.com; 'BESS' Cc: bess-cha...@ietf.org Subject: Re:

Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-mh-pa-02

Anoop, Could you confirm that you are fine with the changes proposed by Luc, so we can move the draft forward to next steps ? Thanks ! From: Anoop Ghanwani Sent: lundi 5 juillet 2021 21:39 To: Luc André Burdet Cc: slitkows.i...@gmail.com; bess-cha...@ietf.org; BESS Subject: Re:

Re: [bess] [**EXTERNAL**] Re: WG Last Call, IPR and Implementation Poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-fxc

Hi, We got IPR replies from all the authors now. WGLC is closed and the draft will move to the next step. Stephane From: Boutros, Sami Sent: mardi 9 novembre 2021 16:18 To: Ali Sajassi (sajassi) ; slitkows.i...@gmail.com; 'BESS' Cc: bess-cha...@ietf.org Subject: Re: [**EXTERNAL*

Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-mh-pa-02

Hi, Speaking as co-chair, I agree with Jorge and Luc. We have consensus to get the document moving forward. WGLC is now closed. Brgds, Stephane From: Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View) Sent: lundi 15 novembre 2021 19:08 To: Dikshit, Saumya ; Luc André Burdet ; Anoop Gh

Re: [bess] Murray Kucherawy's Discuss on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy-14: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Hi Murray, >There's an IPR disclosure on this document. In the shepherd writeup, where a >summary of the discussion of it is requested, it simply says "There are 3 IPRs >disclosed". I'd like to hear that summary, or at least confirm the discussion >was had and there were no concerns as a resu

[bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-mh-split-horizon

Hello Working Group, This email starts a two weeks Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-mh-split-horizon [1]. This poll runs until *the 9th of Feb*. We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this document, to ensure that IPR has been disclos

Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-mh-split-horizon

Hi, Regarding this draft, we are missing IPRs from most of the authors. Authors, Please respond to the IPR poll. The draft requires some updates before we can move fwd as discussed on the list. Brgds, Stephane From: BESS mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org> > on behalf

[bess] Slides for meeting

To all presenters, Please share your slides asap (today). We are the first session on Monday. Thanks in advance. Stephane ___ BESS mailing list BESS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

[bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-redundant-mcast-source

Hello WG, This email starts a two weeks Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-redundant-mcast-source [1]. This poll runs until * the 1th of June *. We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this Document, to ensure that IPR has been discl

Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-redundant-mcast-source

Hi Authors, We are still missing some IPR poll replies from some authors. Please help resolving it before we can move forward. Thanks, From: Sathappan, Senthil (Nokia - US/Sunnyvale) Sent: vendredi 20 mai 2022 01:58 To: Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Sunnyvale) ; slitkows.i...@gmail.co

Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-redundant-mcast-source

Hi Jeffrey, Do you have an ETA for the IPR to be filled ? We'll need to ensure that the disclosure accessible to the WG before we move to IESG. In the meantime, we can proceed with the Shepherd review as we got all IPR replies. Thanks, Stephane From: Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang

Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-redundant-mcast-source

Hi WG, IPR disclosure is now available in datatracker: https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft &id=draft-ietf-bess-evpn-redundant-mcast-source Brgds, Stephane

Re: [bess] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-mh-split-horizon-03.txt

Hi Gyan, Anoop, As you commented during the WGLC, could you please confirm that this new version is OK for you ? Then, we'll move fwd. Thanks, Stephane From: BESS On Behalf Of Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Sunnyvale) Sent: jeudi 23 juin 2022 13:17 To: bess@ietf.org Subject: Re: [be

Re: [bess] WG adoption poll and IPR poll for draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-ac-aware-bundling

Thanks Samir. We now have all IPR answers. We go enough support on this draft and no objection. The document is adopted as WG document. Authors please republish the doc as -ietf- Thanks From: Samir Thoria (sthoria) Sent: jeudi 17 novembre 2022 19:19 To: Ali Sajassi (saj

[bess] WG adoption poll for draft-wang-bess-sbfd-discriminator

Hello, This email begins a two-weeks WG adoption poll for draft-wang-bess-sbfd-discriminator-05 [1]. Please review the draft and post any comments to the BESS working group list. We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this document, to ensure that IPR has

[bess] WG adoption for draft-brissette-bess-evpn-vpws-seamless

Hello, This email begins a two-weeks WG adoption poll for draft-brissette-bess-evpn-vpws-seamless-07 [1]. Please review the draft and post any comments to the BESS working group list. We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this document, to ensure that IPR

  1   2   >