I've read the draft and I support publishing it as a standards track RFC.
Best Regards,
Zhenqiang Li
li_zhenqi...@hotmail.com
From: Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)
Date: 2020-12-01 01:15
To: draft-ietf-bess-srv6-servi...@ietf.org; bess@ietf.org
Subject: [bess] WG Last Call, IPR and Implement
Hello all,
I update my draft. 4PE is introduced in this doc to meet the gap pointed out in
RFC7439. 4PE routers in IPv6-only MPLS network can use MP-BGP extended in this
doc to connect IPv4-only islands.. Your comments are very appreciated.
li_zhenqi...@hotmail.com
From: internet-drafts
for draft-li-bess-4pe-01:
Please add my response to comments from Keyur and Wim: 4PE routers need IPv4
next hop information to install their IPv4 routing table.
Thanks and Best Regards,
li_zhenqi...@hotmail.com
From: Thomas Morin
Date: 2016-04-08 05:44
To: BESS
Subject: [bess] minutes of our
the 4PE router use v6 NH or v4 NH in its IPv4 routing table? I
want to confirm whether or not the 4PE router can install its IPv4 routing
table with two kinds of NLRI format illustrated in your picture.
li_zhenqi...@hotmail.com
From: Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE)
Date: 2016-05-03 16:41
To: EXT
Hello Reshma, Ketan and Jie,
I want to know the specific scenario to be addressed. For UCMP traffic
steering, the current bandwidth utilization is more important than the link
bandwidth, in my opinion.
Best Regards,
Zhenqiang Li
China Mobile
li_zhenqi...@hotmail.com
From: Dongjie \(Jimmy
Hi Gyan,
I do not think link bandwidth is helpful for weighted UCMP load balancing
because in the field network the link with big bandwidth may be congested and
meanwhile the link with small bandwidth may be in low utilization.
Best Regards,
Zhenqiang Li
China Mobile
li_zhenqi...@hotmail.com
