Re: [bess] WG adoption poll for draft-malhotra-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-04

Support. Thanks, --Satya From: BESS on behalf of "stephane.litkow...@orange.com" Date: Tuesday, September 4, 2018 at 12:29 AM To: "bess@ietf.org" Subject: [bess] WG adoption poll for draft-malhotra-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-04 Hi WG, This email begins a two-week poll for BESS working group adopt

Re: [bess] Last Call: (Framework for EVPN Designated Forwarder Election Extensibility) to Proposed Standard

Hi Anoop, Thank you very much for your editorial comments and review. We will take care of it. Best, --Satya On 12/7/18, 1:01 AM, "BESS on behalf of Anoop Ghanwani" wrote: I have reviewed the doc and I have mostly editorial comments. Thanks, Anoop == Throug

Re: [bess] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework-06

Hi Adrian, Thank you very much for your detailed review and comments. We will take care of all the nits that you have pointed out and include the reference to the IEEE/ACM TON paper (the link you have pointed out is indeed correct). However, I had one query. Most of the time research journal/co

Re: [bess] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework-06

th [JORGE]. There is one outstanding comment that Satya and I will discuss. Thank you. Jorge -Original Message- From: "Satya Mohanty (satyamoh)" Date: Friday, December 7, 2018 at 9:11 PM To: Adrian Farrel , "rtg-...@ietf.org"

Re: [bess] Referencing material behind a paywall

Thank you Stephen, Carsten and Heather for your input. Jorge will be publishing the revised version soon. Best Regards, --Satya On 12/10/18, 2:14 PM, "Stephen Farrell" wrote: On 10/12/2018 20:41, Heather Flanagan wrote: > Ekr offered an interesting proposal that would have th

Re: [bess] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework-07: (with COMMENT)

Adam, Thanks to you and Benjamin for this review and feedback on the hashing. Please see inline [Satya]. I will add my response to other queries in the forthcoming Jorge's reply to Benjamin (as there are other comments to be addressed). Best, --Satya On 1/9/19, 10:31 PM, "Adam Roach"

Re: [bess] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework-07: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Hi Benjamin, Thanks for your comments. My replies inline [Satya] On 1/18/19, 8:01 AM, "Benjamin Kaduk" wrote: On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 10:10:16PM +, Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View) wrote: > Benjamin, > > Thank you very much for your review. > Satya a

Re: [bess] WG adoption and IPR poll for draft-malhotra-bess-evpn-irb-extended-mobility-04

Support the draft. Thanks, --Satya From: BESS on behalf of "stephane.litkow...@orange.com" Date: Tuesday, March 5, 2019 at 12:43 AM To: "bess@ietf.org" , "draft-malhotra-bess-evpn-irb-extended-mobil...@ietf.org" Cc: "bess-cha...@ietf.org" Subject: [bess] WG adoption and IPR poll for draft

Re: [bess] BDF Election in EVPN VPWS Single-Active Multihoming

Hi Muthu, Yes, the BDF is as per what you have mentioned. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework-09 formally defines it. Thanks, --Satya From: BESS on behalf of Muthu Arul Mozhi Perumal Date: Friday, March 22, 2019 at 11:41 AM To: "Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/M

Re: [bess] BDF Election in EVPN VPWS Single-Active Multihoming

Mozhi Perumal Date: Monday, March 25, 2019 at 8:22 AM To: "Satya Mohanty (satyamoh)" Cc: "Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)" , "bess@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [bess] BDF Election in EVPN VPWS Single-Active Multihoming Hi Satya, draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-el

Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy

Support. Thanks, --Satya From: BESS on behalf of "stephane.litkow...@orange.com" Date: Monday, June 17, 2019 at 1:56 AM To: "bess@ietf.org" Cc: "bess-cha...@ietf.org" Subject: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy Hello Working Group, This ema

Re: [bess] Comments on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df

Hi Stephane, An alternative way to guarantee precedence per vlan (i.e. the most granular) rather than the vlan-range in the vlan-based service models, could be by using the DF extcom in the per EVI AD route instead of the procedures in Section 4.2 relevant to the vlan range. But this may not b

Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df

Hi, Support as co-author. I am not aware of any undisclosed IPR related to this draft. Thanks, --Satya From: "slitkows.i...@gmail.com" Date: Tuesday, October 22, 2019 at 7:46 AM To: "bess@ietf.org" , "draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref...@ietf.org" Cc: "bess-cha...@ietf.org" Subject: WGLC, IPR and i

Re: [bess] WG adoption poll for draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-mvpn-seamless-interop

Support. Thanks, --Satya From: BESS on behalf of "slitkows.i...@gmail.com" Date: Monday, October 28, 2019 at 3:10 AM To: "bess@ietf.org" Cc: "bess-cha...@ietf.org" Subject: [bess] WG adoption poll for draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-mvpn-seamless-interop Hello, This email begins a two-weeks WG ad

Re: [bess] WG Adoption and IPR Poll for draft-litkowski-bess-rfc5549revision-00

Support. Thanks, --Satya From: BESS on behalf of "Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)" Date: Wednesday, November 27, 2019 at 4:37 AM To: "bess@ietf.org" Cc: "bess-cha...@ietf.org" Subject: [bess] WG Adoption and IPR Poll for draft-litkowski-bess-rfc5549revision-00 Hello, This email begins a two-w

Re: [bess] RFC 8277

Hi, If the next-hop is set to some third-party device at the option-B ASBR and a new label is advertised, then we have to make sure that at that third-party device, the particular prefix is in fact bound to that particular label. Therefore, in addition to setting the next-hop at the ASBR there

Re: [bess] RFC 8277

Thanks Robert. Yes, I made a general observation. Best, --Satya From: Robert Raszuk Date: Thursday, December 12, 2019 at 11:34 AM To: "Satya Mohanty (satyamoh)" Cc: Gyan Mishra , michael walden , "bess@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [bess] RFC 8277 Hi Satya, I believe the addr

Re: [bess] WGLC , IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-03

Support. Thanks, --Satya From: BESS on behalf of "slitkows.i...@gmail.com" Date: Friday, January 17, 2020 at 12:56 AM To: "bess@ietf.org" , "draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb.auth...@ietf.org" Cc: "bess-cha...@ietf.org" Subject: [bess] WGLC , IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-

Re: [bess] WG Last Call and IPR Poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-oam-req-frmwk-02

Support. Thanks, --Satya From: BESS on behalf of "Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)" Date: Monday, June 15, 2020 at 3:56 AM To: "draft-ietf-bess-evpn-oam-req-fr...@ietf.org" , "bess@ietf.org" Subject: [bess] WG Last Call and IPR Poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-oam-req-frmwk-02 This email starts a

Re: [bess] Second try: Router's MAC Extended Community in draft-ietf-bess-evpn-inter-subnet-forwarding

Hi Ali and John, In the DMZ Link bandwidth draft https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-idr-link-bandwidth-07 sec. 2, we have the following sentence. “No more than one link bandwidth extended community SHALL be attached to a route.” Can we add similar wording in here as similar logic applies

Re: [bess] Second try: Router's MAC Extended Community in draft-ietf-bess-evpn-inter-subnet-forwarding

udder" Date: Saturday, October 10, 2020 at 7:16 PM To: "Satya Mohanty (satyamoh)" Cc: "Ali Sajassi (sajassi)" , "draft-ietf-bess-evpn-inter-subnet-forward...@ietf.org" , BESS Subject: Re: [bess] Second try: Router's MAC Extended Community in draft-ietf-be

Re: [bess] WG adoption and IPR poll for draft-mohanty-bess-weighted-hrw-01

Support as co-author and not aware of any undisclosed IPR. Thanks, --Satya From: "Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)" Date: Wednesday, December 9, 2020 at 1:23 AM To: "bess@ietf.org" Cc: "draft-mohanty-bess-weighted-...@ietf.org" Subject: WG adoption and IPR poll for draft-mohanty-bess-weighted-hrw-

Re: [bess] WG Last Call, IPR and Implementation Poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-irb-extended-mobility-01

Support. Thanks, --Satya From: BESS on behalf of "slitkows.i...@gmail.com" Date: Monday, January 18, 2021 at 12:58 AM To: "bess@ietf.org" Cc: "bess-cha...@ietf.org" Subject: [bess] WG Last Call, IPR and Implementation Poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-irb-extended-mobility-01 This email start

Re: [bess] RFC 8584: EVPN DF Election - Originating Router's IP Address of different address family

Hi Tulasi and Muthu, Yes, the numeric value here refers to the 4byte or 16byte unsigned value representation of the IP address field. Maybe in the 7432-bis this can be stated explicitly. We did envision this possibility in RFC 8584 (the HRW hash already takes care of the fact that the IP addres

Re: [bess] RFC 8584: EVPN DF Election - Originating Router's IP Address of different address family

Hi Jorge, Inline. From: BESS on behalf of "Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)" Date: Friday, February 5, 2021 at 6:05 AM To: TULASI RAM REDDY , Muthu Arul Mozhi Perumal Cc: "bess@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [bess] RFC 8584: EVPN DF Election - Originating Router's IP Address of different

Re: [bess] WG adoption and IPR poll for draft-mohanty-bess-weighted-hrw-01

Thanks Matthew. We will do the needful and resubmit. Best Regards, --Satya From: "Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)" Date: Thursday, March 11, 2021 at 1:53 AM To: "bess@ietf.org" Cc: "draft-mohanty-bess-weighted-...@ietf.org" Subject: Re: WG adoption and IPR poll for draft-mohanty-bess-weighted-hrw

Re: [bess] WG and IPR poll adoption poll for draft-krattiger-evpn-modes-interop

Support. Thanks, Satya From: BESS on behalf of "slitkows.i...@gmail.com" Date: Monday, April 19, 2021 at 11:07 AM To: "bess@ietf.org" Cc: "bess-cha...@ietf.org" Subject: [bess] WG and IPR poll adoption poll for draft-krattiger-evpn-modes-interop Hello, This email begins a two-weeks WG ado

[bess] Request discussion on Cumulative Link Bandwidth Draft

Hi all, On behalf of all the authors, we request a discussion of the draft https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-mohanty-bess-ebgp-dmz-03 and subsequent WG adoption. This draft extends the usage of the DMZ link bandwidth to scenarios where the cumulative link bandwidth needs to be advert

Re: [bess] Request discussion on Cumulative Link Bandwidth Draft

deployments (next-hop-self). There is no notion of aggregating bandwidth here. HTH. Best Regards, --Satya From: "UTTARO, JAMES" Date: Wednesday, May 26, 2021 at 5:38 AM To: Gyan Mishra , Robert Raszuk Cc: Jeff Tantsura , Arie Vayner , "bess@ietf.org" , "Satya Mohanty (satya

Re: [bess] Request discussion on Cumulative Link Bandwidth Draft

, Robert Raszuk , "Satya Mohanty (satyamoh)" , "UTTARO, JAMES" , "bess@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [bess] Request discussion on Cumulative Link Bandwidth Draft Thanks Jeff for the clarification. Thanks Gyan On Fri, Jul 2, 2021 at 6:05 PM Jeff Tantsura mailto:jefftant.i...

Re: [bess] WG adoption poll and IPR poll for draft-mohanty-bess-ebgp-dmz-03 [1].

I support WG adoption as co-author. Best Regards, --Satya From: "Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)" Date: Tuesday, September 7, 2021 at 5:42 AM To: "bess@ietf.org" Cc: "draft-mohanty-bess-ebgp-...@ietf.org" Subject: WG adoption poll and IPR poll for draft-mohanty-bess-ebgp-dmz-03 [1]. Resent-From:

Re: [bess] Last Call: (Updates on EVPN BUM Procedures) to Proposed Standard

Hi authors, One question on the draft Page #11, last paragraph; " The ASBRs in an AS originate per-region I-PMSI A-D routes and advertise to their external peers to advertise tunnels used to carry traffic from the local AS to other ASes. Depending on the types of tun

Re: [bess] Last Call: (Updates on EVPN BUM Procedures) to Proposed Standard

4, 2021 at 12:31 PM To: "Satya Mohanty (satyamoh)" , "last-c...@ietf.org" , IETF-Announce Cc: "ext-zzhang_i...@hotmail.com" , "martin.vigour...@nokia.com" , "bess-cha...@ietf.org" , "draft-ietf-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-upda...@ietf.org"

Re: [bess] WG adoption poll and IPR poll for draft-mohanty-bess-ebgp-dmz-03 [1].

Hi Matthew, I should have mentioned before. I am not aware of any IPR on this work. Best Regards, --Satya From: BESS on behalf of "Satya Mohanty (satyamoh)" Date: Thursday, September 9, 2021 at 11:04 AM To: "Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)" , "bess@ietf.org"

Re: [bess] EVPN Draft Comments

On 2/2/15 5:42 AM, "Russ White" mailto:ru...@riw.us>> wrote: Y'all: I know this is in auth-48 (or maybe past), but I've been through these docs a number of times, and still come up with questions that I think need to be addressed/answered at some point. In general, eVPN seems to be on the recei

Re: [bess] EVPN Draft Comments

On 2/2/15 4:16 PM, "Russ White" mailto:ru...@riw.us>> wrote: In step 3 of DF election, the list of IP addresses is ordered in "increasing numeric value." What if you have a mix of v4 and v6 addresses? [Satya] One possible solution may be to do a lexicographic comparison of keys (the iP address

Re: [bess] New Version Notification for draft-mohanty-bess-evpn-df-election-00.txt

FYI, below is the updated draft, with the corrected name from L2VPN to BESS. [was previously draft-mohanty-l2vpn-evpn-df-election-00] Also, the actual hash function is clarified here. Thanks, --Satya On 3/9/15 3:38 PM, "internet-dra...@ietf.org" mailto:internet-

Re: [bess] Handshaking among PEs in an EVPN ES based on Paxos algorithm

Hi Weiguo, I read your draft. Your proposal introduces quite a bit of overhead as John has pointed out. It is indeed bringing the role of AD routes into the DF election which has been intentionally kept separate so far. As John points out, the AD routes will now be advertised ever so often, even

Re: [bess] Handshaking among PEs in an EVPN ES based on Paxos algorithm

Thomas, Thanks for your summary. It captures the essence of the discussion. One feature of the HRW scheme is that it computes the Active and the Backup DF upfront. Whenever the Active PE, say PE1, dies; the Backup PE, PE2, can become the Active immediately upon receiving the withdraw of the ES ro

Re: [bess] Handshaking among PEs in an EVPN ES based on Paxos algorithm

Hi Haoweiguo, On 3/26/15 9:55 PM, "Haoweiguo" mailto:haowei...@huawei.com>> wrote: Hi Satya, Pls see inline. Thanks, weiguo ________ From: Satya Mohanty (satyamoh) [satya...@cisco.com<mailto:satya...@cisco.com>] Sent: Friday, March 27, 20

[bess] Request for WG adoption of draft-mohanty-bess-evpn-df-election

;> >> >> >>Rabadan, Jorge : >>> As I said: >>> "Even if CE3 forwards to CE4->PE4, PE4 is NDF and will discard the >>>frame. >>> Remember MH network ES' as per your diagram below, only support >>> single-active MH.” >>

Re: [bess] Handshaking among PEs in an EVPN ES based on Paxos algorithm

Also, as in the private communication, I don’t really see any mac flip-flop issue as we are considering the same ESI. It is "NOT" equivalent to the mac-mobility. Thanks, --Satya From: "jdr...@juniper.net" mailto:jdr...@juniper.net>> Date: Tuesday, April 7, 2015 6:53 A

Re: [bess] Request for WG adoption of draft-mohanty-bess-evpn-df-election

Gentle Reminder to the chairs. Can we please initiate WG adoption? A fair amount of discussion has taken place and clarifications made. Thanks, --Satya On 3/30/15 11:21 PM, "Satya Mohanty (satyamoh)" wrote: >Hi, > >Given the interest and technical discussions on the t

Re: [bess] Slots requests for BESS WG session - IETF 93 - Prague

Hi Martin, We will like to schedule a slot for EVPN DF Election. We have some on-line and off-line discussions going on frequently. Best Regards, --Satya On 6/22/15 1:44 AM, "Martin Vigoureux" wrote: >All, > >it is time we start building the BESS WG agenda for Prague. >The IETF agenda is avail

Re: [bess] REG: draft-mohanty-bess-evpn-df-election-02

Hi Sudeep, Please see inline [Satya]. Patrice, thanks for your observation. From: BESS mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org>> on behalf of "Patrice Brissette (pbrisset)" mailto:pbris...@cisco.com>> Date: Monday, November 23, 2015 6:53 PM To: sudeep g ggg mailto:sudhinja...@rediffmail.com>>, "bess@iet

Re: [bess] REG: draft-mohanty-bess-evpn-df-election-02

Hi Kishore/Sudhin, From: Kishore Tiruveedhula mailto:kisho...@juniper.net>> Date: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 12:42 PM To: smohanty mohanty mailto:satya...@cisco.com>>, "Patrice Brissette (pbrisset)" mailto:pbris...@cisco.com>>, sudeep g ggg mailto:sudhinja...@rediffmail.com>>, "bess@ietf.org

Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-mohanty-bess-evpn-df-election-02

Support as co-author. Thanks, ‹Satya On 1/11/16, 1:07 AM, "BESS on behalf of Martin Vigoureux" wrote: >Hello working group, > >This email starts a two-week poll on adopting >draft-mohanty-bess-evpn-df-election-02 [1] as a working group item. > >Please state on the list if you support adoption o

Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-mohanty-bess-evpn-df-election-02

I¹m not aware of any IPR related to the draft. Thanks, ‹Satya On 1/11/16, 1:07 AM, "BESS on behalf of Martin Vigoureux" wrote: >Hello working group, > >This email starts a two-week poll on adopting >draft-mohanty-bess-evpn-df-election-02 [1] as a working group item. > >Please state on the list

Re: [bess] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-etree

Support publication of this draft. It is a good document for the Etree framework to EVPN. Thanks, ―Satya On 1/24/16, 9:40 PM, "BESS on behalf of Ali Sajassi (sajassi)" wrote: > >Support publication of this document as a co-author and I am not aware of >any IPR that hasn¹t been disclosed. > >Che

Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-rabadan-bess-evpn-optimized-ir-02

+1 Thanks, ‹Satya On 2/8/16, 5:46 PM, "BESS on behalf of Antoni Przygienda" wrote: >Support, smart extension to the basic IR ... > >thanks > >--- tony >_ >"Simple, clear purpose and principles give rise to complex and >intelligent behavior. Complex r

Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-brissette-bess-evpn-yang

Support. Thanks, —Satya From: BESS mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org>> on behalf of Susan Hares mailto:sha...@ndzh.com>> Date: Wednesday, May 25, 2016 at 8:26 AM To: 'Thomas Morin' mailto:thomas.mo...@orange.com>>, "bess@ietf.org" mailto:bess@ietf.org>> Cc: "draft-brissette-be

Re: [bess] WG Last Call (including implem status & shepherd) for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-overlay

Support. Thanks, —Satya > >> -Original Message- >> From: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of >> thomas.mo...@orange.com >> Sent: Monday, June 13, 2016 5:26 AM >> To: BESS >> Cc: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-over...@tools.ietf.org >> Subject: [bess] WG Last Call (including implem

Re: [bess] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-inter-subnet-forwarding-03

Support. Thanks, —Satya > >On 2/13/17, 11:07 PM, "BESS on behalf of Martin Vigoureux" > wrote: > >Hello Working Group, > >This email starts a Working Group Last Call on >draft-ietf-bess-evpn-inter-subnet-forwarding-03 [1] which is considered >mature and ready for a final

Re: [bess] Call for adoption: draft-rabadan-bess-evpn-pref-df

Support as co-author. I am not aware of any IPR related to the draft. Thanks, —Satya On 6/6/17, 6:44 AM, "thomas.mo...@orange.com" wrote: >Hello working group, > >This email starts a two-week call for adoption on >draft-rabadan-bess-evpn-pref-df-02 [1] as a Working Group Document. > >Please

Re: [bess] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-bess-fat-pw-bgp

Support. Thanks, —Satya On 6/12/17, 9:27 AM, "BESS on behalf of Martin Vigoureux" wrote: >Hello Working Group, > >This email starts a Working Group Last Call on >draft-ietf-bess-fat-pw-bgp-02 [1] which is considered mature and ready >for a final working group review. > >¤ Please read this

Re: [bess] Call for adoption: draft-drake-bess-datacenter-gateway

Support for adoption. Thanks, —Satya On 9/25/17, 3:11 AM, "BESS on behalf of Martin Vigoureux" wrote: >I meant the 9th of October, sorry. > >Le 25/09/2017 à 11:42, Martin Vigoureux a écrit : >> Hello working group, >> >> This email starts a two-week call for adoption on >> draft-drake-bess-

Re: [bess] WG Last Call (including implem status) for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-ac-df

Yes, this will be consistent with the existing framework. Thanks, —Satya From: BESS mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org>> on behalf of "stephane.litkow...@orange.com" mailto:stephane.litkow...@orange.com>> Date: Wednesday, January 31, 2018 at 12:55 AM To: "jdr...@

Re: [bess] New bess WG Co-Chair

Second that. Thanks Martin for all the work that you undertook while being chair. Best Regards, —Satya From: BESS mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org>> on behalf of "Ali Sajassi (sajassi)" mailto:saja...@cisco.com>> Date: Tuesday, February 13, 2018 at 9:27 AM To: Alvaro Retana mailto:aretana.i...@gmail

Re: [bess] draft-mohanty-bess-evpn-bum-opt-00 - clarification on problem description

that will give us the same behavior I don't agree w/ this. John Sent from my iPhone On Mar 21, 2018, at 10:16 PM, Satya Mohanty (satyamoh) mailto:satya...@cisco.com>> wrote: We will take the feedback and revise the next version with the EVPN GW case as the primary use case. Also, w

Re: [bess] draft-mohanty-bess-evpn-bum-opt-00 - clarification on problem description

Some additional comments inline [Satya] From: BESS mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org>> on behalf of Sandy Breeze mailto:sandy.bre...@eu.clara.net>> Date: Saturday, March 24, 2018 at 11:39 AM To: "Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)" mailto:jorge.raba...@nokia.com>>, Eric C Rosen mailto:ero...@

Re: [bess] draft-mohanty-bess-evpn-bum-opt-00 - clarification on problem description

Hi John, We will take your feedback into account. Thanks, —Satya From: "jdr...@juniper.net" mailto:jdr...@juniper.net>> Date: Monday, March 26, 2018 at 6:00 AM To: satyamoh mailto:satya...@cisco.com>>, Sandy Breeze mailto:sandy.bre...@eu.clara.net>>, "Rabadan, Jorge

Re: [bess] WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework

Hi Stephane, I am not aware of any IPR that hasn’t already been disclosed. Cisco has implemented the HRW DF election that is described in this draft. Thanks, —Satya From: BESS mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org>> on behalf of "stephane.litkow...@orange.com" mai

Re: [bess] WG Last Call and IPR Poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpls-seamless-integ-01.txt

Support. Thanks, —Satya From: BESS mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org>> on behalf of "Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)" mailto:matthew.bo...@nokia.com>> Date: Wednesday, March 28, 2018 at 5:50 AM To: "draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpls-seamless-in...@ietf.org

Re: [bess] Shepherd's review of draft-ietf-bess-df-election-framework

Hi Stephane, Many thanks for your detailed review. We will take care of the comments and do the due diligence. Regarding one comment that you had [Stephane] Section 4.1 Any clue on why HRW has been picked compared to CHASH algorithms ? I am assuming you mean CHASH to be "Consistent Hashing”

Re: [bess] WG Adoption and IPR Poll for draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-virtual-eth-segment-03

Support adoption. Thanks, --Satya From: BESS on behalf of "Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)" Date: Friday, June 1, 2018 at 5:48 AM To: "bess@ietf.org" Cc: "draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-virtual-eth-segm...@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [bess] WG Adoption and IPR Poll for draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-virtual-eth-

Re: [bess] WG adoption poll and IPR poll for draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-per-mcast-flow-df-election

Support. Thanks, --Satya From: BESS on behalf of "stephane.litkow...@orange.com" Date: Wednesday, August 8, 2018 at 6:38 AM To: "bess@ietf.org" Subject: [bess] WG adoption poll and IPR poll for draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-per-mcast-flow-df-election Hi WG, This email begins a two-week poll for

Re: [bess] WG adoption poll and IPR poll for draft-mohanty-bess-ebgp-dmz-03 [1].

Hi Matthew, Thanks for your comments. We will republish this draft as draft-ietf-bess-ebgp-dmz-00 shortly. Best Regards, --Satya From: BESS on behalf of Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB) Date: Thursday, December 9, 2021 at 5:36 AM To: Ajay Kini Cc: Akshay Gattani , bess@ietf.org , Lukas Krattiger

Re: [bess] WG adoption poll and IPR poll for draft-mohanty-bess-ebgp-dmz-03 [1].

23, 2022 at 1:54 PM To: Satya Mohanty (satyamoh) Cc: Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB) , Ajay Kini , Akshay Gattani , bess@ietf.org , Lukas Krattiger (lkrattig) , draft-mohanty-bess-ebgp-...@ietf.org Subject: Re: [bess] WG adoption poll and IPR poll for draft-mohanty-bess-ebgp-dmz-03 [1]. Pinging

Re: [bess] Section 8.5 of draft-ietf-bess-rfc7432bis

Thanks Jorge. Gyan, indeed all the three algorithms have their use-cases. As pointed out below in case of inconsistency (the “Alg type”) in the DF election extended community for a given ES, it was decided that the DF election must default to the modulo-based simply because modulo-based was pro

[bess] Request for WGLC for draft-ietf-bess-ebgp-dmz

Hi BESS community, Draft https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-ebgp-dmz/ has more than one implementation and deployed in the field. Authors would like to request the chairs for WGLC. Please let us know if there are any questions related to the draft. Thanks, --Satya ___

Re: [bess] WG Adoption and IPR poll for draft-sajassi-bess-secure-evpn-06

I have read the draft and support its adoption. Thanks, --Satya From: BESS on behalf of Matthew Bocci (Nokia) Date: Thursday, May 25, 2023 at 3:36 AM To: bess@ietf.org Cc: draft-sajassi-bess-secure-e...@ietf.org , bess-cha...@ietf.org Subject: [bess] WG Adoption and IPR poll for draft-saja

Re: [bess] Request for IDR WG review of draft-ietf-bess-ebgp-dmz-02

Hello all, Gentle reminder for any review /comments as solicited by the BESS chairs. This has already been deployed in networks for some time now and supported by many vendors. Thanks, --Satya From: BESS on behalf of Matthew Bocci (Nokia) Date: Thursday, May 25, 2023 at 3:44 AM To: i...@ietf

Re: [bess] [Idr] Request for IDR WG review of draft-ietf-bess-ebgp-dmz-02

Hi Alvaro and Robert, Thanks to both for your review. I am in agreement that https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-idr-link-bandwidth-07 needs to be refreshed. Please see inline From: Idr on behalf of Robert Raszuk Date: Thursday, June 22, 2023 at 11:58 AM To: Alvaro Retana Cc:

Re: [bess] Review of draft-ietf-bess-ebgp-dmz-03

Hi Sue, Thanks for your comments. Yes, we are in discussion with other vendors regarding link-bandwidth and we will together put a document that will consider all the aspects that you have mentioned. Indeed, the transitive or non-transitive implementation across vendors poses a challenge to im

Re: [bess] WG Adoption and IPR poll for draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-ip-aliasing-09

I support the adoption of this draft to the WG. Thanks, Satya From: BESS on behalf of Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang Date: Monday, November 13, 2023 at 3:51 AM To: 'BESS' Cc: 'bess-cha...@ietf.org' , draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-ip-alias...@ietf.org Subject: [bess] WG Adoption and IPR poll for draft-