Same here,
Thanks,
Sami
From: Sam Aldrin
Date: Tuesday, July 14, 2020 at 1:04 AM
To: "Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)"
Cc: "slitkows.i...@gmail.com" , "bess@ietf.org"
, "draft-ietf-bess-evpn-gen...@ietf.org"
, "bess-cha...@ietf.org"
, "idr@ietf. org"
Subject: [**EXTERNAL**] Re: WG
+1
From: "Parag Jain (paragj)"
Date: Saturday, July 4, 2020 at 7:25 AM
To: "slitkows.i...@gmail.com" , "bess@ietf.org"
, "draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-p...@ietf.org"
Cc: "bess-cha...@ietf.org"
Subject: [**EXTERNAL**] Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-ping
Ciena has partial implementation of the draft.
Thanks,
Sami
On 9/2/21, 10:11 AM, "Parag Jain (paragj)" wrote:
Hi Matthew,
Cisco does not have a shipping implementation of the draft.
As Ali and many other experts replied, LSP ping is widely used for
detecting data plane failures
Hi Matthew,
Ciena has a shipping product with the draft implemented, that are being
deployed by service providers. As such, as a co-author we need the publication
to proceed.
Thanks,
Sami
On 9/3/21, 10:01 AM, "Boutros, Sami" wrote:
Ciena has partial implementation of
I support the publication and not aware of any IPR.
Thanks,
Sami
From: BESS on behalf of "Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia -
US/Mountain View)"
Date: Tuesday, September 28, 2021 at 8:29 AM
To: "slitkows.i...@gmail.com" , 'BESS'
Cc: "bess-cha...@ietf.org"
Subject: [**EXTERNAL**] Re: [bess] WG Last Call,
I support the publication and not aware of any IPR.
Thanks,
Sami
From: "UTTARO, JAMES"
Date: Tuesday, September 28, 2021 at 7:29 AM
To: "Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)" ,
"Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)" , "bess@ietf.org"
Cc: "draft-ietf-bess-evpn-gen...@ietf.org"
Subject: [**EXTERN
I support the publication too, and am not aware of any undisclosed IPR.
Thanks,
Sami
From: BESS on behalf of "Ali Sajassi (sajassi)"
Date: Tuesday, November 9, 2021 at 4:06 AM
To: "slitkows.i...@gmail.com" , 'BESS'
Cc: "bess-cha...@ietf.org"
Subject: [**EXTERNAL**] Re: [bess] WG Last Call, I
Actually the draft is there.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-sr-bess-evpn-vpws-gateway-00.html
Thanks,
Sami
From: BESS on behalf of Loa Andersson
Date: Sunday, March 20, 2022 at 7:11 AM
To: BESS , bess-cha...@ietf.org
Cc: bess-...@ietf.org
Subject: [**EXTERNAL**] [bess] can't fi
I see now Loa,
Agreed the draft name is missing gateway!
Thanks,
Sami
From: Loa Andersson
Date: Sunday, March 20, 2022 at 6:57 PM
To: Boutros, Sami , BESS ,
bess-cha...@ietf.org
Cc: bess-...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [bess] [**EXTERNAL**] can't find a document that is listed
Sami,
That
es along with the Geneve tunnel sub-TLV
and in addition to the ESI-label Extended Community.
Remove "and".
On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 8:47 AM Boutros, Sami
mailto:40ciena@dmarc.ietf.org>> wrote:
I support the publication and not aware of any IPR.
Thanks,
Sami
From: "UTTA
Hi Matthew,
Please see comments inline below.
From: Matthew Bocci (Nokia)
Date: Friday, December 16, 2022 at 1:56 AM
To: bess@ietf.org , Boutros, Sami
Cc: bess-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [**EXTERNAL**] Re: Implementaion status and request for early
allocation of code points for draft-ietf-bess
when ETREE support is needed.
Thanks,
Sami
From: Anoop Ghanwani
Date: Saturday, December 17, 2022 at 1:25 PM
To: Boutros, Sami
Cc: Boutros, Sami , UTTARO, JAMES
, Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)
, Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)
, bess@ietf.org ,
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-gen...@ietf.org
Hi,
Looking at section 5.2, it doesn’t address quite few cases like for example.
* What should the receiving PE do if it receives a non zero label2, but no
IP VRF route target? Should we treat as asymmetric?
* What should the receiving PE do if the IP VRF route target import the
route
Thanks Jonathan for the review,
I updated the documents to address your concerns.
And submitted https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-geneve-08.txt
Please see comments inline.
Reviewer: Jonathan Hardwick
Review result: Has Issues
Document: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-geneve-07
Reviewer
Hi,
It is not clear in the draft, if you are redirecting BUM traffic or not? I
assume you are not redirecting BUM traffic.
In what redundancy mode will you need to override the DF election? Is it only
for single active and port active?
Thanks,
Sami
15 matches
Mail list logo
