[bess] Re: Revision of draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage and response to Gunter's comments

2024-12-10 Thread Linda Dunbar
Gunter, Thank you very much! Will go through all the ballot comments, address them, and solicit feedback from the BESS WG. Linda From: Gunter van de Velde (Nokia) Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2024 4:06 AM To: Linda Dunbar ; bess@ietf.org Subject: RE: Revision of draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage

[bess] Re: Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-virtual-eth-segment-18: (with COMMENT)

2024-12-10 Thread Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
Ali, This sounds good to me. BTW, my comment about aasvg was obviously not blocking and it is not up to the RFC editor to make this action ;-) Regards -éric From: Ali Sajassi (sajassi) Date: Monday, 9 December 2024 at 22:46 To: Eric Vyncke (evyncke) , The IESG Cc: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-virtu

[bess] Re: Revision of draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage and response to Gunter's comments

2024-12-10 Thread Gunter van de Velde (Nokia)
Hi Linda, Thanks for the heads-up and for the responses. The document was returned to the working group for further processing after the IESG ballot. You can find both the blocking and non-blocking items identified by the IESG here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-usa

[bess] Re: John Scudder's Abstain on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-fxc-11: (with COMMENT)

2024-12-10 Thread Ali Sajassi (sajassi)
Hi John, With regard to your comment on the clarity of this document as a whole from an implementer perspective, I just want to mention that you can consider this document as a second order of derivatives wrt EVPN baseline RFC7432 (with RFC8214 being the first order of derivatives wrt RFC7432).