Hi Sami,
Yes, BUM is out of scope – Sasha already raised this question and it looks like
I forgot to add the clarifying statement. I will in next rev.
* IMHO and FWIW an explicit statement that “BUM is not in-scope of the
draft, it is not redirected” would help the readers. It would also h
The IESG has received a request from the BGP Enabled ServiceS WG (bess) to
consider the following document: - 'EVPN Virtual Ethernet Segment'
as Proposed Standard
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final
comments on this action. Please send substantive commen
Hmm that is interesting..
I would have thought BUM would be in scope.
If a node is DF elected and receives BUM and if his ES is down why can he not
redirect to NDF?
NDF, by virtue of getting traffic on ERL could then bypass the DF election
status and forward it to that local ESI..
Thanks,
Hima
Hi Ali,
Thanks for the update
When none of the formal procedures changed and only clarifications have been
made, then WGLC is not required.
I started the request for a IETF LC for this draft. It will provide an
opportunity to review the latest version of the document.
Brgds,
G/
From: Ali Saja
Hi Himanshu,
If BUM is brought into scope, redirecting from Failed-NDF to DF would cause
issues: DF will have duplicates. Only Failed-DF to NDF can be supported in a
straightforward manner.
However, BUM is (usually) ingress-replicated to both peering PEs. Consider
ingress-replicated traffic t
In line..
Thanks,
Himanshu
From: Luc André Burdet
Date: Monday, November 4, 2024 at 6:16 PM
To: Shah, Himanshu , Boutros, Sami
, BESS
Subject: [**EXTERNAL**] Re: Few questions about
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-burdet-bess-evpn-fast-reroute-08.txt
Hi Himanshu,
If BUM is brought int
Actually, not advertising ERL for conflicted ESI+EVI+VLAN is probably not a
good idea since it will lose benefit for known unicasts.. ☹
Let me sync up with you, if you are attending the IETF or will sync up with
Jorge or Patrice..
Thanks,
Himanshu
From: Shah, Himanshu
Date: Monday, November 4
FYI
A new version of this draft has been posted.
The refresh fixes some typos, updates references and adds some text as
discussed in the mailing list.
Thanks.
Jorge (on behalf of the authors)
From: internet-dra...@ietf.org
Date: Monday, November 4, 2024 at 2:16 AM
To: A. Sajassi , J. Drake , J
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-bess-evpn-ip-aliasing-02.txt is now available. It is
a work item of the BGP Enabled ServiceS (BESS) WG of the IETF.
Title: EVPN Support for L3 Fast Convergence and Aliasing/Backup Path
Authors: A. Sajassi
J. Rabadan
S. Pasupula
