Hi Donald,
Thank you for the detailed replies and for the changes in -08. This looks much
more better to me.
I wonder whether you checked the scalability point raised by Sasha as well.
Wouldn't that be a point that is worth be more elaborated in Section 7?
Aah, I expected the "in-band" thing t
Hi Tulasi,
Yes, there are implementations that follow that text you are highlighting (the
one I’m aware of).
Thanks.
Jorge
From: TULASI RAM REDDY
Date: Wednesday, September 25, 2024 at 10:45 PM
To: draft-ietf-bess-bgp-srv6-a...@ietf.org
, bess@ietf.org ,
skr...@cisco.com , Jorge Rabadan (Nok
Thanks Jorge for the update.
Thanks,
Tulasi.
On Thu, Sep 26, 2024 at 3:30 PM Jorge Rabadan (Nokia) <
jorge.raba...@nokia.com> wrote:
> Hi Tulasi,
>
>
>
> Yes, there are implementations that follow that text you are highlighting
> (the one I’m aware of).
>
>
>
> Thanks.
>
> Jorge
>
>
>
> *From: *T
Hi Mohamed,
thank you for your thoughtful review and constructive comments. In regard
to your question about the interpretation of "in-band" in Abstract, I
propose the following update in Introduction:
OLD TEXT:
The mechanisms
specified in this document use the widely adopted Bidirectional
Forwardi
Hi Med,
thank you for your quick response and a great suggestion. Will use it in
the next update of the draft.
Regards,
Greg
On Thu, Sep 26, 2024 at 10:13 AM wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
>
>
> This works for me. I would s/QoS treatment/forwarding behavior, though.
>
>
>
> Thank you.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
>
Hi Greg,
This works for me. I would s/QoS treatment/forwarding behavior, though.
Thank you.
Cheers,
Med
De : Greg Mirsky
Envoyé : jeudi 26 septembre 2024 18:22
À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET
Cc : Donald Eastlake ; rtg-...@ietf.org; bess@ietf.org;
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-bfd@ietf.org
Objet
Dear All,
A new version of draft-liu-6man-icmp-verification has just been uploaded.
This document introduces the mechanism to verify the data plane against the
control plane and to detect data plane failures in IPv6/SRv6 networks by
extending ICMPv6 messages.
Based on the comments we received on
