[bess] Re: [EXTERNAL] [RTG-DIR]Rtgdir early review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-bfd-07

Mohammed, Lots of thanks for the review. I have posted my concerns about the draft in question some time ago, and they are mainly orthogonal to the issues you raise. However, there is one important point that you are raisi

[bess] Yet another minor inconsistency in draft-ietf-bess-rfc7432bis

Hi, I would like to present what looks to me as yet another minor inconsistency in the rfc7432bis draft. Section 9.2.1 lists four possible methods for allocating the label that is carried in the Label1 field of the NLRI of MAC

[bess] Re: [RTG-DIR]Re: [EXTERNAL] Rtgdir early review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-bfd-07

Hi Sasha, Thanks for zooming into this. I trust the authors will follow up and DISCUSS. The point you raised about scalability is a point I do share as well. I actually found the current scalability discussion in the draft too brief (with mention of +/- timer). Cheers, Med De : Alexander Vain

[bess] Re: [RTG-DIR]Re: [EXTERNAL] Rtgdir early review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-bfd-07

Mohammed, Lots of thanks for an extra-prompt response! One of my main concerns about this this draft is lack of any BFD-based monitoring of the “network layer” of BGP/MPLS IP-VPNs. What do you think? Regards, Sasha From: mohamed.boucad...@orange.com Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2024 3:47 PM T

[bess] IDR Interim meeting 23 September, 2024 (was [Idr] Four IDR Interims planned prior to IETF-121 in Dublin)

BESS Working Group, IDR will be holding an interim meeting this coming Monday. Two bess WG documents covering the BGP link bandwidth functionality are on the agenda to be discussed. We hope to see you at the meeting next week. -- Jeff > Begin forwarded message: > > From: Jeffrey Haas > Su